Ms Ryan also moved to have an affidavit which includes
photo's and
some of the transcript of the voice recording being suppressed. She said the dignity of
those involved should be preserved.
I have been thinking about the voice recording and the timing of it's release to MSN and the words of O'Gorman at that time. Who is now defending GT.
If that voice recording had not been located in the door of Mr Tostee Snr's car.
What then?
The recording appears to be the evidence to imply that GT
was not on the balcony at the time R'rie fell.
So if the recording had been deleted or the phone vanished and that recording not discovered.
The scenario would be;
* Neighbours hearing arguing, loud banging, and a woman sceaming, No,No,No,No............................ and that woman falling from the 14th floor balcony.
Phone records would have shown GT
* phoned his lawyer within seconds.
* he did not phone 000
* he phoned his father, who assisted GT to avoid immediate police attention. Why?
CCTV and/or witnesses would or may have placed GT:
* leaving the apartment immediately and avoiding police.
* his walking route
* his popping into a night club
* ordering and eating a pizza.
* his father becoming involved.
I am still not convinced an earlier call was not made to his father, given suppression of
parts of the recorded transcript have been approved by the judge.
The prosecution suggested that R'rie may have been plied with dangerous home brewed alcohol, was GT consuming that same brew or was that for guests only?
Dad's intervention has ensured that GT's alcohol reading will never be known IMO.
Yet rehab is a part of the bail ...... based on what? His driving record.
http://www.goldcoastbulletin.com.au...trict-conditions/story-fnj94j0t-1227127491700