BBM : Isn't that exactly what the the NSWPF has done with the FFC???Ive listened to every podcast 1-8 start to finish, except for the latest ones because I knew and IMO was right, that these new podcasts would shift from an objective fact based storyline to a bias narrative driven story.
You say DB is investigating the investigation, but that’s not entirely accurate. He’s pursuing a single line of inquiry—one that the police have already explored in relation to WT. If the coroner, with all her years of experience and extensive knowledge, chose not to have FA testify during the inquest, I trust that decision was made in the best interest of W and the integrity of his case.
A level field should include facts or theories based backed with solid evidence and verifiable details
not unsubstantiated opinions, hearsay, or speculations
Well they certainly didn't have the solid evidence & substantiated opinions / theory to give to the coroner.
Gerard Craddock SC, the Counsel Assisting the Coroner, said a statement from the lead investigator on the case Detective Chief Inspector David Laidlaw had been heavily redacted as it was “in the form of one person’s opinions about what evidence shows”.
The determination of this inquest at this stage is to concentrate on facts,” Mr Craddock said.
Last edited: