Do you think it’s possible that Police have some “evidence” that William is actually deceased???
In November 2021, Detective Chief Superintendent Darren Bennett, in a national presser said,
it’s “
highly likely that if we found something it would be a body” when announcing the new three-week search.
“We are looking for the remains of William Tyrrell, there’s no doubt about that,” he said.
At the same time, it was reported that the Police had
“new evidence”
Fresh evidence that has revived the investigation and triggered a search this week has also brought renewed hope for closure. Exactly what that new evidence is has not been revealed by police.
Then in June 2023, it was reported that Police had submitted a brief to the ODPP to recommend the FM to be charged with offences including
interfering with a corpse….
Almost a year on, police have quietly been building evidence in support of allegations that William's foster mother covered up his accidental death and disposed of his body.
The potential charges include perverting the course of justice and interfering with a corpse, the most serious carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years behind bars.
For that particular charge, interfering with a corpse, should we consider that Police could have some sort of evidence that William is infact deceased, despite not having found a body….???
It just seems to me, that the recommended charge of “interfering with a corpse” would have to be based on more than just a random accident theory??? That Police would need to have some specific evidence to indicate William is deceased …..in order to recommend that particular charge.
All IMO …. And just wondering how Police came up with those recommended charges, in particular….. hope that makes sense.
References:
There is renewed hope for closure in one of Australia’s most notorious missing persons cases – and the country is transfixed
www.theguardian.com
www.9news.com.au