“It’s all politics … I’ve been caught right in the middle. And now they’re saying that (redacted name) covered up for me”.
Redacted name: FGM? FF?
Alot to unpack in that article....“It’s all politics … I’ve been caught right in the middle. And now they’re saying that (redacted name) covered up for me”.
Redacted name: FGM? FF?
bbm, GJ?“It’s all politics … I’ve been caught right in the middle. And now they’re saying that (redacted name) covered up for me”.
Redacted name: FGM? FF?
certainly, but as discussed earlier its very very easier to verify if it really happened at a child care centre. Child care centre incident/injury/trauma/illness records are kept until the child turns 25."You seem to only listen to me when I threaten to get violent with you."
"If I get that attitude ... I'm going to slap you across the face," the woman said.
OK, by her own admission she's definitely a face hitter. Yep, I have wonder about William's black eye.
I agree - just the way it was worded, gives me chills.https://www.news.com.au/national/ns...s/news-story/8d80ce4ae61c633e860a2797aeefde74
"Two days later, the mother was recorded getting frustrated at the child over not turning lights off and again over not putting objects away.
“Where we’ll end up is me with a black garbage bag. Do you want to end up in that spot?” the mother asked.
The child responded “no” and that she’ll “put them away”, to which the mum said: “if you don’t, I’ll slap you across the face”.
JMO - There may also be some other relevance in her comment about: “Where we’ll end up is me with a black garbage bag. Do you want to end up in that spot?” the mother asked.
SA, I think it was important for LE to demonstrate that there was a "pattern of violence and abuse" in that household. A single event could possibly have been explained away by the FFFC as just that, a single event where she lost control. But now it is overwhelmingly clear (to me, at least) that it was ongoing and probably has always been. It is very important in the case they are trying to make. I'm sure the LE officers must've been distraught listening to this ongoing abuse, but also knowing they need enough evidence to act, to be able to remove the children from this toxic environment. Tough job! I'm glad I'm not in their shoes.For me, I am disturbed that the NSW police would use a pre-teen to further their case. By keeping the child in a situation where the child would be deemed at risk.
If they think this won't have negative ramifications on this child's life in the future, I think they are mistaken.
The FM broke the law by striking a foster child. The police knew that law had been broken, yet left the child in the situation and the law was broken again.
Will this further William's case, or will the Coroners (or other) Court see this as a set-up/entrapment?
As I said before, other than the first charge, the police could have avoided the rest of the behaviour that was charged - and spared the child. There should have been one charge, and then removal of the child. imo
certainly, but as discussed earlier its very very easier to verify if it really happened at a child care centre. Child care centre incident/injury/trauma/illness records are kept until the child turns 25.
For a well-educated person, the Former FM has a foul mouth, foul attitude and a horrible human being. I am embarrassed that I believed her for so many years. Poor kids, all 3 of them“It’s all politics … I’ve been caught right in the middle. And now they’re saying that (redacted name) covered up for me”.
Redacted name: FGM? FF?
I smelt her stinky from the get-go....For a well-educated person, the Former FM has a foul mouth, foul attitude and a horrible human being. I am embarrassed that I believed her for so many years. Poor kids, all 3 of them![]()
I thought the exact same thing. I am feeling so sick reading these articles.I agree - just the way it was worded, gives me chills.
Agreed! No other POI would get that protection.I smelt her stinky from the get-go....
But we couldn't talk about it till she became a suspect.
She STILL is afforded anonymity....no face...no name.
Disgusting.
It doesn't matter that you gave her the benefit of doubt.Agreed! No other POI would get that protection.
I am ashamed, I believed, food. Thinking about their interviews pretend crying, what a narcissist she is.
BBM why is fostering unsavoury and imperfect?Its pretty clear to the naked eye FM desperately wanted a family.
Getting into her 40s with no babies coming the mental torture and expectation of her beautiful little family finally coming to her via unsavoury imperfect means but so be it.....
yet being childless well into midlife a pattern of control over all areas of your life becomes thrown out the window as any parent here knows.
Being a parent is selfless and compromising.
The disappointment of these craved children's lack of gratitude that she was their mother.....I speculate today a VERY BIG DEAL.
MOO
For a well-educated person, the Former FM has a foul mouth, foul attitude and a horrible human being. I am embarrassed that I believed her for so many years. Poor kids, all 3 of them![]()
BBM why is fostering unsavoury and imperfect?
bbm, GJ?
SA, I think it was important for LE to demonstrate that there was a "pattern of violence and abuse" in that household. A single event could possibly have been explained away by the FFFC as just that, a single event where she lost control. But now it is overwhelmingly clear (to me, at least) that it was ongoing and probably has always been. It is very important in the case they are trying to make. I'm sure the LE officers must've been distraught listening to this ongoing abuse, but also knowing they need enough evidence to act, to be able to remove the children from this toxic environment. Tough job! I'm glad I'm not in their shoes.