I've been following the case closely, and am just now chiming in. As with most missing persons cases, we are clearly missing one, if not more, piece of information. Things in this case, really, really don't make sense. We are missing one vital piece of information. Things that I have been thinking about include, if she was intent on seeing her bf, and the location of her last being seen is accurate, why wouldn't she just walk down the same street in a straight line to get to her bf's apartment? Why call a cab and have them meet you at a location that is a farther walk for her? I realize the spot to meet the cab was a gas station (public place, landmark etc) but it still doesn't make sense. And between the time she called for the cab and last texted her bf, was there any other activity on her phone? What was she doing, walking to the spot to meet the cab? And it has been brought up before but bears repeating, her phone shuts off two minutes after texting her bf. That seems to me, either she turned it off after texting her bf, figuring she didn't need it anymore, or it was turned off/taken by someone. Something itching at me that she may have not been alone in the car in the first place. Or another car was in the area with her.