AZ - Lori Vallow Daybell charged w/ conspiring to kill ex-husband Charles Vallow and another relative, Brandon Boudreaux, Chandler, Maricopa County #4

What if you were on this jury and you did not find LVD guilty of conspiracy to commit murder, and then you learn out about her prior bad act for which she has been convicted? Can you imagine what a horrible feeling that would be? I’m not sure I could forgive myself. 😢

I'm certainly of a different mindset that most watchers, it seems.

No, I would not feel "guilty" at all over evidence that is not part of this case, if I was a juror. What she did elsewhere does not tell us what she did in this case, and also it's the prosecution's responsibility (not the juror's) to provide evidence that rises to BARD standard. If they don't, it's on them, and not on the jury. If I'm a juror, I do my job to the best of my ability, and then move on.

Nor am I (as an onlooker) really on pins and needles about this outcome, frankly. While I think she will be convicted, it's an incredibly insignificant difference if she's not, given the fact that she will NEVER be required to serve whatever sentence is imposed. She's already doomed to be locked up in Idaho for her next 3 lifetimes, and she'll never even finish that, of course. While those victimized do want her to be declared guilty, and while that's a reasonable emotion, it makes no difference whatsoever in regards to what happens to her, and I can't really get worked up about that meaning very much to me. Just being honest here.

I certainly respect all of you who see this in a different way than I do, and respond to it differently, but as a long-time follower of the CD-LVD nonsense, that's where I've landed.
 
Last edited:
I blame Melanie for that also. I don’t know why she is walking around. Don’t know why her husband is still with her.
edit: Melanie or Melani?

IMO
Watching her during her police interview was infuriating.
Haha, flirty, haha, flirty...
She sure changed her tune when testifing.
She should have been charged with a felony for lying to LE..for starters.
Buzz on the street is her husband D also strives to be another crazy,cray spiritual leader.

LE was sent this recorded phone call MG made to a woman who she was in contact with on social media.
The first time the woman ever spoke to her.

 
Last edited:
I'm certainly of a different mindset that most watchers, it seems.

No, I would not feel "guilty" at all over evidence that is not part of this case, if I was a juror. What she did elsewhere does not tell us what she did in this case, and also it's the prosecution's responsibility (not the juror's) to provide evidence that rises to BARD standard. If they don't, it's on them, and not on the jury. If I'm a juror, I do my job to the best of my ability, and then move on.

Nor am I (as an onlooker) really on pins and needles about this outcome, frankly. While I think she will be convicted, it's an incredibly insignificant difference if she's not, given the fact that she will NEVER be required to serve whatever sentence is imposed. She's already doomed to be locked up in Idaho for her next 3 lifetimes, and she'll never even finish that, of course. While those victimized do want her to be declared guilty, and while that's a reasonable emotion, it makes no difference whatsoever in regards to what happens to her, and I can't really get worked up about that meaning very much to me. Just being honest here.

I certainly respect all of you who see this in a different way than I do, and respond to it differently, but as a long-time follower of the CD-LVD nonsense, that's where I've landed.
I hear you, but to me it's mainly about justice for Charles too, he deserves that too, I feel, and Charles' family FOR sure. Since Charles cannot speak anymore about what REALLY went down, and may get snowed under all the other horrible deaths connected to this creature, I am glad the State is being his voice, hopefully effectively enough.
 
After. That was in October. Because she couldn't get her hands on Charles' life insurance suddenly, she was hoping she could get her niece's ex husband Brandon's Life Insurance money instead, via manipulating her niece. It's a whole new level of depraved evil, IMO.
Poetic Justice that it was BB that ended up with millions from Melani's lawyer who defamed him during their divorce/custody battle,
 
edit: Melanie or Melani?

IMO
Watching her during her police interview was infuriating.
Haha, flirty, haha, flirty...
She sure changed her tune when testifing.
She should have been charged with a felony for lying to LE..for starters.
Buzz on the street is her husband D also strives to be another crazy,cray spiritual leader.

LE was sent this recorded phone call MG made to a woman who she was in contact with on social media.
The first time the woman ever spoke to her.

I’m speaking of Mel Boudreaux Pawlowski not Mel Gibb.
And I know one is Melanie and one just a Melani but I don’t know which is which. They are both self absorbed crazies.
 
I'm certainly of a different mindset that most watchers, it seems.

No, I would not feel "guilty" at all over evidence that is not part of this case, if I was a juror. What she did elsewhere does not tell us what she did in this case, and also it's the prosecution's responsibility (not the juror's) to provide evidence that rises to BARD standard. If they don't, it's on them, and not on the jury. If I'm a juror, I do my job to the best of my ability, and then move on.

Nor am I (as an onlooker) really on pins and needles about this outcome, frankly. While I think she will be convicted, it's an incredibly insignificant difference if she's not, given the fact that she will NEVER be required to serve whatever sentence is imposed. She's already doomed to be locked up in Idaho for her next 3 lifetimes, and she'll never even finish that, of course. While those victimized do want her to be declared guilty, and while that's a reasonable emotion, it makes no difference whatsoever in regards to what happens to her, and I can't really get worked up about that meaning very much to me. Just being honest here.

I certainly respect all of you who see this in a different way than I do, and respond to it differently, but as a long-time follower of the CD-LVD nonsense, that's where I've landed.
I really agree with you. Outcome won’t change the fact she will die in prison in Idaho. But I don’t want her to get any satisfaction of winning anything after murdering Charles and her children or feeling elevated or that she is a lawyer. So there’s that.
 
Watching her during her police interview was infuriating.
Haha, flirty, haha, flirty...
She sure changed her tune when testifing.
She should have been charged with a felony for lying to LE..for starters.
Buzz on the street is her husband D also strives to be another crazy,cray spiritual leader.

LE was sent this recorded phone call MG made to a woman who she was in contact with on social media.
The first time the woman ever spoke to her.

I don't see a situation where MG (or DW) could be charged as an accessory to murder. Unlike ZP, she did not have immunity. IIRC there was a controversy about the above call - depending on the state, you need consent of the other party to record. I didn't find anything special in the call either, except for gossiping. The call took place after MG already spoke with police several times.
 
We don't know what % his lawyer received but we do know that BB not LVD ended up with millions.
I found the story , looks like he would have received at least SOME money, whatever liability insurance those slandering lawyers had, my word, and I remember now that they had done that, those insane lies, in a press release even.
Never realized he won that case, that is good news!
 
I really agree with you. Outcome won’t change the fact she will die in prison in Idaho. But I don’t want her to get any satisfaction of winning anything after murdering Charles and her children or feeling elevated or that she is a lawyer. So there’s that.
Exactly.
In addition she'd take her obnoxious arrogance into BB's trial.
 
I don't see a situation where MG (or DW) could be charged as an accessory to murder. Unlike ZP, she did not have immunity. IIRC there was a controversy about the above call - depending on the state, you need consent of the other party to record. I didn't find anything special in the call either, except for gossiping. The call took place after MG already spoke with police several times.
I didn't suggest that anyone should also be charged with an accessory murder.
Melanie with a felony for lying to LE, yes.
 
I really agree with you. Outcome won’t change the fact she will die in prison in Idaho. But I don’t want her to get any satisfaction of winning anything after murdering Charles and her children or feeling elevated or that she is a lawyer. So there’s that.

I wish she went to prison in Arizona. It is much worse than Idaho. Arizona prisons have gangs. LVD would be out of luck.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
151
Guests online
2,386
Total visitors
2,537

Forum statistics

Threads
621,403
Messages
18,432,157
Members
239,595
Latest member
Digvijay
Back
Top