- Joined
- May 21, 2013
- Messages
- 19,722
- Reaction score
- 152,256
The parents say he has/had Strabismus, or what used to be called crossed eyes.I probably missed it, but what's wrong with the baby's eyes?
The parents say he has/had Strabismus, or what used to be called crossed eyes.I probably missed it, but what's wrong with the baby's eyes?
Maybe people at the funeral for the brother were asking about him..I’ve wondered why they did also. There has to have been a reason or they wouldn’t have
We would deem them more like tweakers in CaliforniaI couldn't figure out from that post 870 video how it was determined that those people were homeless. They looked more like random hikers to me.
"Sheriff's department says it's aware of" = "yeah, yeah, someone told us something that turned out to be fruitless", IMO.Holy crap. If that's a real sighting, I'll be amazed. I never even considered that it might be an actual kidnapping.
I get that, but also if my sibling or grandchild were missing I think I'd probably risk it. Maybe not, though.I wouldn’t want to be bombared with media and speak out if I was her kids. Have random Tik tok people chasing me around
Yeah, even in more populated areas in Los Angeles that I’m familiar with, homeless are often known to authorities and/or the community. It’s quite the coincidence, but it really does sound like a coincidence.re the fire and the two people who allegedly set it: if they are transients, LE is probably aware of them in an area said to have a population of 2600, and familiar with them. I do believe they were probably transients, squatting on a property they knew as vacant. Regardless, hikers or transients, LE seem to feel the fire is not related to this case but rather is coincidental. Until they tell us otherwise I am content to accept that from them.
Many people have guessed as to the cause of the baby's eyes, but no one actually knows.I probably missed it, but what's wrong with the baby's eyes?
In the very first post by the San Bernadino County Sheriff they reported that he's cross-eyed, which is known as Strabismus.Many people have guessed as to the cause of the baby's wonky eyes, but no one actually knows.
Yes, I thought I heard him say that at least twice, and imo, he did seem to be implying the mom might be the guilty one, not his client, or at least leaving open that possibility without actually saying it.A spokesperson for the Sheriff's Department says Jake Haro's vehicle was seized for evidence amid the investigation. He is cooperating with law enforcement and investigators, his attorney said in a statement.
At this point, deputies have not put out a description for a potential suspect.
Over the weekend, detectives also searched the parents' Cabazon home with K-9 units. A fire broke out Tuesday at a house on the same block where the Haros live. Authorities say the fire's proximity to the Haros' residence appears to be a coincidence.
Authorities seize vehicle belonging to father of baby boy reported missing in Yucaipa
Jake's attorney speaks
interesting to me that Jake's attorney said - "they haven't had their vehicles since Thursday night, when the ALLEGED kidnapping happened"
Replying to myself since I cannot edit post. This is the original video with gramma off to the left. About 1:40 you can see her lips moving. Concentrate on her while listening to RH speaking. Am I nuts, or does this come across as scripted?IMO if it was more than a day or so since they claimed he was abducted, then the "everywhere" grandma might be complicit. In one video of RH speaking, for a few seconds you can see a bit of her on the left and I swear her mouth is 100% synced to what RH was saying.
She is everywhere and if she cared about Emmanuel, we might well know when last proof of life was. Then again, she is pretty much delusional. All IMO.