It was a football game.It was a baseball game. Since the 17th was a Sunday, it's not clear to me what time the game would have started - 2 pm?
She was last seen at the baseball game, which is not in downtown LA, but southwest of the city.
It was a football game.It was a baseball game. Since the 17th was a Sunday, it's not clear to me what time the game would have started - 2 pm?
She was last seen at the baseball game, which is not in downtown LA, but southwest of the city.
Every single story has said she was at her son's "football" game?It was a baseball game. Since the 17th was a Sunday, it's not clear to me what time the game would have started - 2 pm?
She was last seen at the baseball game, which is not in downtown LA, but southwest of the city.
You can't just put someone's name on paperwork and SEC filings without their permission... She obviously knew her name was on the information, I just couldn't imagine a situation in which I would let someone use my name like that. I'm kind of fanatical about that type of stuff , but even people who are more easy going I would think would not be offering up their name and social's to be liable for an entire LLC.
Yep. It was a football game at St. Pius X - St. Matthias Academy, not sure where this baseball thing came from.Every single story has said she was at her son's "football" game?
IME, a 10 year old can have insanely sharp little eyes. He may notice the special wallet she carries at special times- the one no one else knows about- is gone from her top drawer. Or the shoes she wore to back-to-school night. Or her travel cosmetic bag is not in her carry-on bag. Or her mother’s brooch- the one she pinned to her wedding purse- is no longer in a box behind her basket of scarves. A baby photo on the fridge… Imo, significant things often come with stories & kids remember those. The absence or presence of anything could mean something. If I felt he was up to the task, & LE cleared it, I’d let him look. JmoHe's 10. I don't think he would notice something missing unless it was very obvious (tooth brush in the bathroom) or something that was his (toy, blanket).
Could be company car? House too. Even if tax records show assets in her name, could be a result of bonuses. Not that unusual if you are the right-hand of a major financial player. Just thinking out loud- haven’t searched tax rolls.
Why did police do a wellness check, find nothing, and then come back a few days later with their guns drawn expecting there to be someone there and some sort of potential danger?
Did they not know about the first check or did they learn something in between?
Perhaps she was being paid for her participation in the LLCs, even if it was just her name and info on the paperwork.
MOO
All true and it happens often anyway. No clue if it happened here.If you give a house as a bonus/income it still passes through the recipients taxes and taxes must be paid on, a house that expensive would have taxes that were astronomical on the gift.... I'm not a tax attorney but the IRS doesn't just let companies give out houses without getting their dues from as many people as possible. But who knows weirder things have happened, just from a tax perspective I'd think not.
I'm bringing this forward because I think people should be familiar with it, it's the basis of the theory that Heidi knew something about the alleged fraud.This suggests that the fraud case is still very much alive. I can’t find any decision that would suggest otherwise, maybe someone else can. https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2020-09/19-cv-5998.pdf
It was a baseball game. Since the 17th was a Sunday, it's not clear to me what time the game would have started - 2 pm?
She was last seen at the baseball game, which is not in downtown LA, but southwest of the city.
Thanks, my mistake, sorry for the confusion.It has been widely reported that it was a football game, not a baseball game. She was said to have left at halftime, Baseball games do not have halftimes. And unless California is different from the rest of the country, fall is football season, baseball is pretty much over.
How about Nevada or Wyoming?In California, you can look up a real estate agent's license here: Public License Lookup - DRE I did not find her listed.
Well that is one massive cast of characters- if you include all the peeps from all the companies involved.I'm bringing this forward because I think people should be familiar with it, it's the basis of the theory that Heidi knew something about the alleged fraud.
Firstly, everything in the alleged fraud happened in 2014-2015, before Heidi was employed by Camden Capital Partners, a shell company used by JS for managing his personal investment capital.
Then, at the beginning of page 4, there is this statement "JS then directed his assistant to incorporate a limited liability company in Nevada bearing the Ballybunion name"
The statement has no relevance to Heidi, but in my opinion shows exactly how/why her name is on so many incorporation records. She was his assistant, he would direct his assistant to file the paperwork, so she would do so under her name as the 'agent'. It may actually be a requirement that the person doing the actual filing list their name, like if you do someone's taxes, you have to list your name.
I used to do corporate title searches, and it was often done this way: under the wife's name, for eg.
Also, to keep a company active, annual financial reports have to be filed each year, and the information updated. So if a corporation was created in 2007, that doesn't mean she created it in 2007, it just means she is the current agent filing the documentation.
It doesn't mean she knows anything about it, she doesn't have to take an oath or anything. For a annual corporate report, it's the financial accounting firm who signs a statement at the end of the document, that it is accurate within their knowledge.
MOO
" her name on so much of their corporate paperwork," -- that ain't no 'executive assistant' -- imho....
IMO there is also probably alimony she receives that helps economically and I think she easily makes six figures plus -my friend is an executive asst to a CEO and makes over 100k.
i think HP house prob worth over a million but a million dollar house in areas of ca, being a million is not some fancy house. my house i rent is worth probably 1.2 and i rent it for 3550. and i make 40k a year, my husband makes maybe 60. but we have no choice because there is nothing cheaper that we fit in.
Sorry, I didn't make myself clear.Well that is one massive cast of characters- if you include all the peeps from all the companies involved.
a) I’m gonna need a cheat sheet for sure
b) In terms of motive, there’s who stands the most to lose- with her knowledge. But also who has already lost the most & wants payback- by using what she knows. So cover your arse or sweet revenge? Or something else entirely?
Very complicated! Jmo, moo, etc
I was wondering if she was sort of caretaking the house. In my area there are very fancy homes that are being held by wealthy owners for future use or sale - they are simply an investment. They don't want to rent them out, that would damage them. And they don't want them to sit empty. So a lucky trusted person gets to live there free, as long as they keep it immaculate, which it sounds like Heidi did.my friend is an executive asst to a CEO and makes over 100k.
i think HP house prob worth over a million but a million dollar house in areas of ca, being a million is not some fancy house. my house i rent is worth probably 1.2 and i rent it for 3550. and i make 40k a year, my husband makes maybe 60. but we have no choice because there is nothing cheaper that we fit in.
I'm bringing this forward because I think people should be familiar with it, it's the basis of the theory that Heidi knew something about the alleged fraud.
Firstly, everything in the alleged fraud happened in 2014-2015, before Heidi was employed by Camden Capital Partners, a shell company apparently used by JS for managing his personal investment capital.
Then, at the beginning of page 4, there is this statement "JS then directed his assistant to incorporate a limited liability company in Nevada bearing the Ballybunion name"
The statement has no relevance to Heidi, but in my opinion shows exactly how/why her name is on so many incorporation records. She was his assistant, he would direct his assistant to file the paperwork, so she would do so under her name as the 'agent'. It may actually be a requirement that the person doing the actual filing list their name, like if you do someone's taxes, you have to list your name.
I used to do corporate title searches, and it was often done this way: under the wife's name, for eg.
Also, to keep a company active, annual financial reports have to be filed each year, and the information updated. So if a corporation was created in 2007, that doesn't mean she created it in 2007, it just means she is the current agent filing the documentation.
It doesn't mean she knows anything about it, she doesn't have to take an oath or anything. For a annual corporate report, it's the financial accounting firm who signs a statement at the end of the document, that it is accurate within their knowledge.
MOO