part of the states case is that the defendant had white supremacist literature, and part of that involves an hatred of not only gay people but people of other ethnicities,
the defence are arguing that he was not interested in white supremacy thus he had no hatred of gays and alongside that they must try to show that he had no racist tendensies to bolster there argument that he is not into white supremacy
the defence are arguing that he was not interested in white supremacy thus he had no hatred of gays and alongside that they must try to show that he had no racist tendensies to bolster there argument that he is not into white supremacy