- Joined
- Nov 5, 2009
- Messages
- 4,659
- Reaction score
- 47,429
Did they say why?Broadcast not permitted in Nick Reiner arraignment
Per CourtTV
Did they say why?Broadcast not permitted in Nick Reiner arraignment
Per CourtTV
Oh no. I hope the daughter isn't going to backpedal and try to get her brother acquitted. Their parents gave him too much benefit of the doubt and look how they ended up.So, who could be the anonymous friend? That report of the daughter mentioning her brother as "dangerous" was in the very first reports
![]()
New details emerge of how Rob and Michele Singer Reiner’s bodies were found
An unnamed source told the New York Times the Reiners’ daughter, Romy, had discovered only her father’s body, and disputed reports the couple argued with their son, Nick, at a party the previous eveningwww.theguardian.com
Exactly. The article made me feel very sorry for Rob Reiner, who seemed desperate to have everything happy and loving.Thanks for the link! So N admits he was not entirely clean even when he was paraded around 10 years ago for his successful Being Charlie involvement. Proves he does have a conscience, not a true psychopath, he knew full well he was faking his sobriety. That also explains his weird behavior during videos of various interviews.
JMO
“While he’d managed to get off meth and heroin, he was still drinking and smoking pot. “I said to [the film’s publicists], ‘Listen, I’m not in a position to do this. I’m not a quote unquote sober guy.’ I’m going to have to go on these talk shows. They said you have to do this. They want the whole father-son angle. It just goes to show you how disgusting it is.” But he finally relented. “It was uncomfortable, but I felt like it was part of the job.”)”
I can't see him being acquitted because the crime is just too brutal: His parents' throats slashed.Oh no. I hope the daughter isn't going to backpedal and try to get her brother acquitted. Their parents gave him too much benefit of the doubt and look how they ended up.
I'm not putting anything into the daughter/sister "backpedaling" just because a tabloid says something different than another MSM (likely tabloid) source.Oh no. I hope the daughter isn't going to backpedal and try to get her brother acquitted. Their parents gave him too much benefit of the doubt and look how they ended up.
We should be prepared for a very long wait until any possible trial, as the psychiatrists enter the stage and court-ordered mental exams begin. I'm talking years of waiting for a resolution.
Beau Bruneau in Florida was finally tried after 12 years (!) and hundreds of motions and continuances. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity for the gruesome murder of his mother, and will probably spend the rest of his life in a mental hospital.
There are other similar cases I've followed, but this one took the longest to settle.
Hope I'm wrong, but I'm thinking 5-7 years until trial for NR.
I can't see him being acquitted because the crime is just too brutal: His parents' throats slashed.
To my mind, unfortunately, it hints of circling the wagons in defense of NR. Nah, he wasn't disturbing the party, nah, he wasn't acting up lately, no way did sis say he was dangerous. The NYT wouldn't have featured Joe Schmo as anonymous family friend. It was someone important, getting a counter story out, which contradicted the many msm links we didn't have to dig up, they're everywhere.I'm not putting anything into the daughter/sister "backpedaling" just because a tabloid says something different than another MSM (likely tabloid) source.
Also, the DA had warned against believing ANYTHING unless it comes from them, the ME, etc. His quote warning about not believing all the misinformation out there is in THIS post.
i kind of thought that it would make sense that some of the intial reports would be wrong or exaggerated, with so many people probably talking about what happened and what they had heard had happened, rumours going around, etc. but this does make sense too! hmmTo my mind, unfortunately, it hints of circling the wagons in defense of NR. Nah, he wasn't disturbing the party, nah, he wasn't acting up lately, no way did sis say he was dangerous. The NYT wouldn't have featured Joe Schmo as anonymous family friend. It was someone important, getting a counter story out, imo.
Not anything I heard, but looks like video is released afterDid they say why?