Not really worth reading, IMHO.
Not news that Dina and Rebecca did not get along.
I was surprised at the vehemence and the fact that websleuths was quoted.
Seems like a lot of 'inside information' also. Wonder how JS will feel about the comments?!
Not really worth reading, IMHO.
Not news that Dina and Rebecca did not get along.
Hmmm.... anyone else know any of that info or have a link to it?
Possibly due to the fact that they were supposed to be present. Prescription Max was on, or used during intubation. Otherwise imho, the test would have been repeated, as is the course where I work.
I was surprised at the vehemence and the fact that websleuths was quoted.
Seems like a lot of 'inside information' also. Wonder how JS will feel about the comments?!
TY Sunnie - I remember you explaining that sometimes when a patient is intubated, anti-anxiety medication is administered.
The ME's report stated that EMTs administered cardiotonic medications (which I assume are some form of adrenaline) and epinephrine (definitely a form of adrenaline) in an effort to restart his heart (and were successful).
The AR doesn't say anything about administering an anti-anxiety med @ the scene, nor does it mention intubation @ the scene.
In the AR, he was described as healthy prior to his accident, so I'm doubting a benzo RX.
I'm still wondering about the positive test for benzodiazepine.
JMO and experience, but I have worked LE in: County, City, State and now federal, in that order. At no time have I ever worked in a department where there was a big conspiracy or a large cover-up, to my knowledge. I think it would be hard to pull off, especially in a multi-agency situation, and a large public interest case. Sure, it CAN happen and I'm sure has happened...but I guess my question would be why in this case, and how would the powers that be that were influenced by mogul's $ or whatever, then have that "look the other way" manner of working trickle down through crime scene techs, several layers of supervisors, several detectives, the ME's office, probably the DA's office, etc.
I guess I'm just not seeing here on the case, yet, a good reason why so many people would put their own personal work up for scrutiny, for some powerful man who they probably never met. Most people want to be known for doing good work, and seeing justice done, especially (right or wrong) when a young child is involved.
Again, not saying it didn't happen that way, but I don't think so. Maybe fault a few people in missing certain details in their work, but that is different than turning the other way to actively participate in shoddy work.
JMO and putting the flame suit on.
to recapitulate what has been suspected many threads ago, the discussions up to now point to "undetermined" cause of death and therefore the case needs to be re-opened since the evidence can be for either voluntary suicide or "assisted involuntary suicide" or "assisted involuntary strangulation" alias murder
By the way, Rebecca's family attorney , News reporters and LEs should be contacted to read our posts here. We have a lot of budding sherlocks here that can help them build the case :rocker:
Well we do have a policeman "onefoot" boot print right there on the balcony. What was he doing up there? I personally don't think it looks good for the investigation when they are presenting foot prints as evidence no one else was on the balcony and yet there is a boot print (from a policeman) right there.
Oh yes, I see the responses now. I don't think it is DS but things said are definitely of DS's belief.
I believe the poster to be from Canada, as I can tell by various spellings, such as "behaviour."
I took the websleuths stuff to be about Rebecca's past of shoplifting.
Good to have you here belimom. I've been wanting to invite you over to this Rebeccas thread because I know you have extensive experience in ropes & knots! I hope you stay with us!
Whoever said this is like a bad mystery novel, but you keep reading until you see how it ends, was spot on imho.
How could LE and the ME miss so many things in their investigation, after 7 weeks?
:doh::juggle: Not sure who is making the comments, but they quoted websleuths. Which means they read and possibly posy under a nic here.:waitasec:
This is just pure skeptical intuition, but I don't totally trust Sheriff Bill "I Invented Science" Gore. He's a company man par excellence, but his crime fighting skills? I don't know. 30 years in the FBI, yes, but I read in one of the sheriff's election debate transcripts that 2 of the 9/11 hijackers were right under his nose in San Diego but slipped through the net. He blamed the CIA.
This link was posted a few threads back but will post again as is pertinent to elementry's comment:
snipped : Gore is a member of the good old boys network of San Diego political corruption. : snipped
Gather your own opinion, but I recommend reading the article in full for an insight into [gotta love it!] Bill "I invented Science" Gore (Elementry, you crack me up :floorlaugh:
http://angiemedia.com/2010/04/20/bill-gore-is-poor-choice-for-san-diego-sheriff/
JMO and experience, but I have worked LE in: County, City, State and now federal, in that order. At no time have I ever worked in a department where there was a big conspiracy or a large cover-up, to my knowledge. I think it would be hard to pull off, especially in a multi-agency situation, and a large public interest case. Sure, it CAN happen and I'm sure has happened...but I guess my question would be why in this case, and how would the powers that be that were influenced by mogul's $ or whatever, then have that "look the other way" manner of working trickle down through crime scene techs, several layers of supervisors, several detectives, the ME's office, probably the DA's office, etc.
I guess I'm just not seeing here on the case, yet, a good reason why so many people would put their own personal work up for scrutiny, for some powerful man who they probably never met. Most people want to be known for doing good work, and seeing justice done, especially (right or wrong) when a young child is involved.
Again, not saying it didn't happen that way, but I don't think so. Maybe fault a few people in missing certain details in their work, but that is different than turning the other way to actively participate in shoddy work.
JMO and putting the flame suit on.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.