tayaway
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Messages
- 1,451
- Reaction score
- 9,941
It seems TPS received the 'foreign' information in May 2020... which may have been requested in the first place, many months prior to that. It's possible that whatever information was gleaned from this 'foreign information', may have been the instigator leading to the further warrant and production orders in Ontario, which came later than September 1st this year.
I agree however, on KD's meaning. Personally I doubt if KD would've twice in one interview used the word 'overseas', if he had in fact been referring to the US. jmo.
It'd be more likely he'd say 'stateside' or 'down south' or any other common references we use to indicate the US.
I was thinking about my dismay that they chose to use what I considered to have been a 'junior' forensic pathologist for the autopsies of both victims in this case, considering this case seems to be not your everyday murder/case, seems to possibly have some staging and therefore possible deception involved (imho). I don't want to argue with anyone about the 'junior' status. I know that six and a half years seems a long time to be in a position, however imho, a forensic pathologist role is a lifelong learning occupation.. the longer one is doing it, the more they will see, the more experience they will gain, etc. I don't think anyone could dispute that?
Given this information, what IF...... all along, Pickup, the pathologist who actually performed both autopsies, had believed it to be a double homicide (he had removed both victims' wrist skin samples to keep as evidence of some kind), but his hands were tied by his superiors, in remaining undetermined?
All of this is just to say... we, the public, don't have a clue what is going on behind various doors, until things become unveiled, like at a trial, or an inquiry. imo.
In a case that parallels a scathing judge’s decision about Ontario’s chief forensic pathologist two years ago, Dr. Michael Pollanen has been accused of interfering in the work of the province’s other forensic pathologists, pressing them to change their findings in suspicious deaths and undermining those who disagree with him.
...
Dr. Jane Turner, a forensic pathologist who worked for almost two years at the Hamilton Regional Forensic Pathology Unit and is now working as a consultant in St. Louis, Mo., made the allegations in an Aug. 12 letter to Ontario Solicitor General Sylvia Jones.
“My complaint against Dr. Pollanen is not that I am always right and Dr. Pollanen is always wrong, but rather that his interference, bullying and insistence on compliance threaten the integrity of the system of death investigation,” Turner told Jones.
“No one is allowed to challenge his views.”
Christie Blatchford: 'Bullying' Ontario chief forensic pathologist accused of interfering with cases | National Post
----
Agree on getting a junior fp, they're more pliable as well. Same with the work dynamics regarding Dr. P; work relationships and personalities certainly can affect cases. Going up the ladder to the TPS, even simple things like an oversight or maybe one of the officers had a conflict of interest which played into it.
If you've ever listened to the Wrongful Conviction podcast, you'll know that humans can be the wildcard in cases, even if they're professional and dot all their i's and cross their t's.