After police “dust” for fingerprints you can tell they have done so. Similarly if the PI recovered hair samples (which they did) it is obvious that LE missed those same hairs. I don’t doubt Greenspan and his team found potential evidence that LE missed.
Yes agreed. The PI team could have found new evidence, my question is how would they truly know it is from the time of the murder. They were only let in after multiple people went through every inch of the home for 6 weeks.
IMO if the PI team found finger prints that were not covered in finger print dust, that they were from the investigation teams.
The hair samples found by PI team, did they have it analyzed, do they know whose hair it is, was it HS, BS, housekeeper, maintenance guy, LE, how can the PI team state this is 100% from the night of the crime.
I am not saying it is or is not, just do not know how they can be so sure.
Feels more like a tactic, releasing the statement to the public, what purpose did that serve? The team was dismantled shortly after and no more statements made to back up the facts they say are true.
This Greenspan team know they can report to the public more details than police can. They made statements that had little to no proof shared to back it up, just more accusations against LE poor investigations, is this to distract everyone’s attention? IMO, If the team really wanted to be helpful to the investigation they would have followed LE directives, gave all evidence they uncovered, but they did not.
That is a defence attorney job, with the known facts, to create doubt, that the facts may not be so cut and dry. That ground work was laid in the first few days when this team was put together. IMO LE/prosecutors know this and are taking time to ensure if they charge someone it will make it to court and they would win.
