Another thing I just remembered, if KD knows, what has he got to lose by claiming so??? There is still a 52 million dollar reward for whomever solves it. You might not make that much in book sales?? Or would you ?
Let me agree with you for a minute, and say that KD a) believes JS is the perpetrator, and you are positive it is not JS.Anyone who follows his work knows that Kevin Donovan believes Jonathon is responsible for the murders, had financial motivations, came up with his plan very quickly, and carried it out with two friends. In the past year he has provided an increasingly elaborate description of what he imagines happened.
He believes all of this without evidence. He also believes, without evidence, that the police share his theory.
I think he’s waaaaaaaaay off and incredibly irresponsible.
It is difficult to imagine anyone known to the Shermans, following/stalking/watching them when each of his and her predictable routines were known by many.Anyone who follows his work knows that Kevin Donovan believes Jonathon is responsible for the murders, had financial motivations, came up with his plan very quickly, and carried it out with two friends. In the past year he has provided an increasingly elaborate description of what he imagines happened.
He believes all of this without evidence. He also believes, without evidence, that the police share his theory.
I think he’s waaaaaaaaay off and incredibly irresponsible.
I'm wondering if KD has ever been threatened? I feel like we'd hear about it in the news if so and don't think the killers would be brazen enough to risk contact in any form.Another thing I just remembered, if KD knows, what has he got to lose by claiming so??? There is still a 52 million dollar reward for whomever solves it. You might not make that much in book sales?? Or would you ?
The “old theory” is that KW murdered the Shermans because he was upset about losing the court case.Does anyone know what came of this or what was released? Sherman Toronto Star
Anything could have changed in the intervening years but KD has previously said he has not been threatened.I'm wondering if KD has ever been threatened? I feel like we'd hear about it in the news if so and don't think the killers would be brazen enough to risk contact in any form.
(Snip)
I don't think KD has that passion or willingness to risk possibly himself or friends or family of any danger if there is any? All speculation on my behalf! JMO MOO
Thanks for confirming! i feel like it would've been in the news too if that was the case. Too risky for the killers as well.Anything could have changed in the intervening years but KD has previously said he has not been threatened.
If he had been, he would have published it on the front page of the Star. I don’t know that there’s much to be learned from a *lack* of threats. He did play up the risk he imagined he was taking by going to JS’s home a few years ago, but nothing came of that and it didn’t appear to be based on any evidence.
Can someone pls advise what NOK is?I was surprised BS wanted to get involved with this Iranian backer, but money is money, and I hear BS could be ruthless.
But def not govt hit. As to the IDF..... hmmmm....
I do think JS had a personal and financial reason. He was angry and owed BS, but I feel he comes off as a dufus, without the mental ability to execute a perfect plan even with help from his bros....... to me this was an expert hit, with a strange amount of personal drama by placing the bodies (I believe this is the clue. It wasn't just a sick hitman, or a hitman displaying a comedy routine, this was personal)
KD def wants to sell books, and no one can hold him to the fire to prove his suspicions as he hasn't come out and said "whodunnit", but he's been clear he is almost positive and it aligns with TPS line of thinking.
TPS could tell him to reveal what he knows about a crime, but that would get really messy, and I don't think TPS wants to go down that trail, especially since NOK appear to no longer care who or what or how.
If JS is #1 suspect, he has certainly remained in the news, with the donations and builds. Even his sister has been splashing out money from the foundation. I"m not arguing about how they've spent it, which I think was all good, but JS certainly did it in a big way....... personally I would stay quiet and go live remotely off my billions..........
Anyways... RIP Jack.... I'm sure you haven't reconnected with BS![]()
BS wasn’t killed at or outside his work because it was important to kill them both. Easier at homeI agree, why watch when you know how predictable they were.
Another thing stands out to me is, why wasn't BS place of business the chosen site for him? Coming out front door, or getting into his car? why the house, unless the person responsible wanted one of the Shermans to see the other murdered. That's personal.
The lack of evidence for a charge baffles me, Either expert or shoddy investigation?
And the usual advice of "follow the money" has produced nothing incriminating. And the reward of a hefty bag of millions hasn't caused someone to talk. To me this is what makes JS suspect. He offered it, knowing no one was going to collect.
KD has never admitted to not understanding the ITOs, estate law, the content of the will he was reading, the court judgment he was reading, etc. It drives me crazy and is the reason there is a ton of misinformation out there. The court would flat-out say that references to persons of interest or current investigative activities are redacted, and he would blithely report as though the newly unredacted stuff was the current police theory. Or he would have an actual copy of the will and report that it left everything to Honey, and that she must have had a will that someone destroyed. In the past year or so this has slowed down; perhaps someone with a legal background explained this stuff in a way he finally understood.Do you think JS felt the TPS liaison officer wasn't sufficient or that he lacked trust in them?
Seems expensive to have a private paid person offering services that TPS could provide with legal authority. Can TPS release information about the case to a third party? Isn't that potential for case contamination or loss of evidence chain of command? The retired detective would have any legal authority? (Nice retirement job tho)
And why would the TPS want to investigate if the Shermans were being followed? If the killings happened in the home and both partners done together it clearly is a targeted killing, someone must have been following them, but what variations would there be to this. Isn't it a moot point?
I wish we had more info. Did KD admit to not understanding the ITO's?
Thank you!Daughter Alexandra on the CBC today (video). She mentions the murders.
NOK, 'next of kin' ?Can someone pls advise what NOK is?