Just been watching the Pat Brown podcast which is about three years old now. Her prime person of interest is KW. She raises some interesting points that has also has led me to a couple of questions which i think are interesting questions about the case.
Now KW has stated he thinks it's a murder suicide. KW is the only family member to believe this as stated by PB.
However, PB lays out perfectly reasonable motive and modus operandi in relation to KW being a person of interest at the top of her list. Im not oing to go through each point by her on here but her podcast gives a full multi point explanation which i feel is perfectly credible.
People will argue that to point the finger at KW is too perfect, too obvious, including KD, however bear with me on this.
What i dont understand is this. If JS is the perpetrator as some believe. Why does JS not point at the finger specifically at KW who had motive and does not have a rock solid alibi. We know KW has the motive. We know the murders were personal. Theres strong evidence this was personal in modus operandi (see pat brown podcast)
So, If i was JS and i was the perpetrator and lets say KW had nothing to do with it, then i would want to divert attention to an obviuous person of interest such as KW and focus on that one person. But JS does not do that?
in fact,, JS mentions different people as possible persons of interest including JK but he doesn't focus on KW.
If as KD claims murders were committed in the perfect storm and the perfect storm alludes to the court case with KW weeks before the murder amongst other things, then why doesn't JS if he was the perpetrator point the finger at KW which would be the logical thing to do?
So, logically I would suggest JS was not the perpetrator and therefore does not know who it is and thus had voiced his opinions as an honest innocent person.
KW took a lie detector test and failed but not on the question "Did you kill Barry and Honey Sherman?" No. He failed on the question asked "if he was ever asked by barry to hire someone to kill honey".
This is interesting because if KW was the perpetrator then he took a chance on passing the test on a question that would not convict him of the murders of honey and barry sherman.
This is significant because it means he now will refuse to answer the question we all want him to answer due to the fact that he will claim it (the lie detector test) got it wrong last time so why should I put myself through another lie detector test for it to accuse him of lying again.
Now maybe KW can prove me wrong and take another lie detector test.
Now I know people are now going to say that the walking man is the wrong height in comparison to KW. So, I would like to know how accurate the methods are when used to identify the height of the walking man and compare to the height of KW. Maybe there are experts out there who would question that the methods used by TPS in this regards are suspect?
For me KW is the right build and similar height to the walking man. The kicking up of the foot could simply be due to walking through the snow.
As PB states in her podcast. The walking man was seen in the vicinity if the shermman house around the time of 5he murders. The walking man did not park a car up but walked on foot because if this person is local then they want to avoid number plate recognition wheras a hitman would use false plates etc.
The walking man fits in with KW profile.
Sometimes the simplest explanations are the answer. Following the money might have clouded the answer to these murders. It's a possibility 5he answer to this case is the most simplest most obvious.
One perpetrator who walked to the house. Committed the crime without use of mobile phone based on a hunch both barry and honey would be home in the evening. There was no perfect storm. Just an inkling of an opportunity of when they ( the shermansb) arrived home which worked out well for the petpetrator, not rocket science for them.
It wasn't complicated.
Then they had a bit of luck. The police believed the crime scene was murder suicide initially.
