• #1,621
I have to disagree that politicians ever get involved in criminal cases.

Police work with individual Crown Prosecutors, who take the case to trial when they have sufficient evidence. They are part of the Attorney General's office, headed by the Deputy AG, a bureacrat.


ETA: also, there is a strong culture of non-disclosure of evidence before a trial. No way would lawyers share details with anyone outside the case, especially not a politician.
Agreed. This would not ever happen.
 
  • #1,622
Agreed. This would not ever happen.
In this case specifically, the then Mayor of Toronto, John Tory, communicated with the Chief of the Toronto Police Services, regarding concerns the Sherman Family had about the case. Here is a Toronto Star Link



You cannot be sure a who has or has not contacted the TPS in official or unofficial roles, so you cannot say it would never happen.

Law Enforcement serves the people, and Government represents the people, It only makes sense there would be communication and dialogue.

Finally, as further proof of authority. The Provincial Government is investigating all Police forces in Ontario based on the corruption scandal in the TPS. The Inspector General of Policing, is leading this review.
The Inspector General of Policing, is part of the provincial Ministry of the Solicitor General.

Here is a CBC link

So in summary, If the Provincial Government wanted to get involved in the Sherman Investigation, I believe they have the authority and power to do so. Saying that, I do believe the Provincial Government may not see any need to be involved at the present time.
 
  • #1,623
John Tory was immediately criticized for speaking to TPS to communicate the family’s concerns. You can read all about it in the story you linked.
 
  • #1,624
John Tory was immediately criticized for speaking to TPS to communicate the family’s concerns. You can read all about it in the story you linked.
Because he was actually a member of the Police Services Board at the time! Not because he was a politician. And he certainly wasn’t AG of Ontario.
 
  • #1,625
To assume as you state, would be taking a massive gamble if you were about to murder someone in front today them. Having said that. If WM is the perpetrator then he didn't care about being seen. His face was covered and he wore plenty of clothing.
How would assuming cameras are operational working, recording be a gamble, I would try avoiding them
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
405
Guests online
3,585
Total visitors
3,990

Forum statistics

Threads
642,370
Messages
18,783,306
Members
244,938
Latest member
The Missing Canoe
Back
Top