• #1,621
I have to disagree that politicians ever get involved in criminal cases.

Police work with individual Crown Prosecutors, who take the case to trial when they have sufficient evidence. They are part of the Attorney General's office, headed by the Deputy AG, a bureacrat.


ETA: also, there is a strong culture of non-disclosure of evidence before a trial. No way would lawyers share details with anyone outside the case, especially not a politician.
Agreed. This would not ever happen.
 
  • #1,622
Agreed. This would not ever happen.
In this case specifically, the then Mayor of Toronto, John Tory, communicated with the Chief of the Toronto Police Services, regarding concerns the Sherman Family had about the case. Here is a Toronto Star Link



You cannot be sure a who has or has not contacted the TPS in official or unofficial roles, so you cannot say it would never happen.

Law Enforcement serves the people, and Government represents the people, It only makes sense there would be communication and dialogue.

Finally, as further proof of authority. The Provincial Government is investigating all Police forces in Ontario based on the corruption scandal in the TPS. The Inspector General of Policing, is leading this review.
The Inspector General of Policing, is part of the provincial Ministry of the Solicitor General.

Here is a CBC link

So in summary, If the Provincial Government wanted to get involved in the Sherman Investigation, I believe they have the authority and power to do so. Saying that, I do believe the Provincial Government may not see any need to be involved at the present time.
 
  • #1,623
John Tory was immediately criticized for speaking to TPS to communicate the family’s concerns. You can read all about it in the story you linked.
 
  • #1,624
John Tory was immediately criticized for speaking to TPS to communicate the family’s concerns. You can read all about it in the story you linked.
Because he was actually a member of the Police Services Board at the time! Not because he was a politician. And he certainly wasn’t AG of Ontario.
 
  • #1,625
To assume as you state, would be taking a massive gamble if you were about to murder someone in front today them. Having said that. If WM is the perpetrator then he didn't care about being seen. His face was covered and he wore plenty of clothing.
How would assuming cameras are operational working, recording be a gamble, I would try avoiding them
 
  • #1,626
Does anyone know if a judge in Ontario or a Federal judge in Canada, or perhaps the Attorney General of Ontario has the authority to force TPS to allow another law enforcement agency to either take over this case, or to conduct an independent review of the actions of the TPS in the case? It seems to me that this needs to be done to progress this case, and to assess and opine whether TPS was negligent in its investigation of this case.
I’ve always found it most interesting that the Chief Coroner of Ontario never held a formal inquest into the deaths of my cousin Barry and Honey. Clearly there were conflicting autopsy reports with different forensic conclusions between the 2: the TPS followed the family lawyer Brian Greenspin’s. A hearing would have clearly established the cause of death with all evidence brought forward. The fact it never happened is puzzling.
 
  • #1,627
I’ve always found it most interesting that the Chief Coroner of Ontario never held a formal inquest into the deaths of my cousin Barry and Honey. Clearly there were conflicting autopsy reports with different forensic conclusions between the 2: the TPS followed the family lawyer Brian Greenspin’s. A hearing would have clearly established the cause of death with all evidence brought forward. The fact it never happened is puzzling.
Not puzzling at all. The Coroner’s Act sets out the purpose of an inquest:

31 (1) Where an inquest is held, it shall inquire into the circumstances of the death and determine,(a) who the deceased was;(b) how the deceased came to his or her death;(c) when the deceased came to his or her death;(d) where the deceased came to his or her death; and(e) by what means the deceased came to his or her death. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.37, s. 31 (1).


The answers to these five questions don’t appear to be in doubt. Moreover, all of the information we have is that the two pathologists came to the same forensic conclusions.
 
  • #1,628
2017
''But they noticed problems with the home within months of moving in, in 1991, with Barry describing it as “a disaster.”
After litigation against the house’s designers and builders, they wound up recouping $2 million of the contracted amount to construct the home, according to a 2006 judgment.''

''They went on to sue at least five of the people and companies involved in the home’s design and construction, including Jack Winston Designs, Thomas Marzotto Architects and Ewing Construction.
All but two settled.
The remaining two defendants, 21 Degrees Heating and Air Conditioning and Walter Kenyon of Walter Kenyon Designs, had designed the home’s heating and air conditioning system.
The Shermans sued 21 Degrees and Kenyon for negligence related to the design of the HVAC system, and 21 Degrees for breach of contract.''

Just for my interest, does anyone know how many lawsuits has Barry filed in his lifetime? In the ballpark of?
 
  • #1,629
Just for my interest, does anyone know how many lawsuits has Barry filed in his lifetime? In the ballpark of?
Ballpark? Hundreds. Apotex was in the lawsuit business.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
206
Guests online
1,564
Total visitors
1,770

Forum statistics

Threads
642,531
Messages
18,786,475
Members
244,968
Latest member
saralaney2018
Back
Top