- Joined
- Aug 29, 2009
- Messages
- 31,617
- Reaction score
- 88,815
Well, I assume they didn't have it with them to go to any job interviews! Besides, what kind of job in Whitehorse would require you wear a suit to!![]()
I never said he did..
Well, I assume they didn't have it with them to go to any job interviews! Besides, what kind of job in Whitehorse would require you wear a suit to!![]()
ALL missing persons in Canada, including First Nations women and 3rd world refugees, should be investigated.
But thats the thing, if are to look at the publicly available facts, they show that RCMP want them for LD's murder, but want to question them regarding LF & CD.
There isn't an arrest warrant for the 2 in regards to the couple. But they've been judged to have killed all 3 in the court of public opinion.
I can't find the link but it has been shared dozens of times in these threads. They are working on charging them with the murders of the other two but they have paperwork etc. They have enough with the 2nd degree murder of LD for an arrest warrant. There is no question they killed the other two.But thats the thing, if are to look at the publicly available facts, they show that RCMP want them for LD's murder, but want to question them regarding LF & CD.
There isn't an arrest warrant for the 2 in regards to the couple. But they've been judged to have killed all 3 in the court of public opinion.
The RCMP could both not know where they are, but also have evidence that someone unknown helped them. At any rate, it's their constant theme. Perhaps they are just shooting at the moon, and perhaps that's their standard assumption. If the Mounties don't get their man, someone must have helped the man.
Dunno.
All I know is that this has gone from cat and mouse, to whack-a-mole and the number of sightings of these 2 guys will go on for at least a week - maybe more. moo.
After thinking about the freezing rain that one night (was it really that cold?), I am thinking they are dead. Guess I should check weather history.
they have said they are working on charges for CD and LF
No, I understand. I'm just saying I'm reserving my judgment until the LE tells us otherwise.they have said they are working on charges for CD and LF
The question if they killed the couple or even the man is going to be up until the court says they did it. Which I hope happens.They have enough with the 2nd degree murder of LD for an arrest warrant. There is no question they killed the other two
@Andreee said: ↑
It is interesting though that they supposedly according to that one 'constable' who stopped them at the 'dry' community said he saw a suit in their vehicle.
In a recent interview, Constable Albert Saunders was heard describing that a window [of the Rav4] was covered when they stopped the vehicle. And not covered with map and/or paper, but a suit, garment. Perhaps it was a coat.
I believe the earlier report from BS father that he purchased a new suit with his earnings were incorrectly assumed.
Having earlier burned their truck/camper, computer, and other personal property, I think it's very unlikely that BS was carting his new "Suit" to Gillam.
MOO
They SUSPECT they murdered the couple. SUSPECT.
The fact that RCMP have repeated a few times that someone may have unwittingly helped them leave the area stands out for me. What I read between the lines is that they think it's likely that someone helped them leave the area, and by suggesting it was not intentional, they hope that person will come forward. That the request is repeated means that no one has come forward, and it is more than a wild guess.
mossy oak camo is stylish wear to me. digital camo is different, it is hard for me to even look at.
Very good point. Logically, LE must have some sort of solid evidence to have proceeded as they have. What bothers me, however, is that they've essentially been tried and convicted in the media. AFAIK, there hasn't been a shred of evidence released that links them to any of the homicides. So with that in mind, I'm not prepared to call for their hanging just yet.
Working on charges means they are looking for evidence to connect them meaning they don't have enough yet to charge them.....2 weeks later.
ETA: Just think about it...they were charged with LD's death quite quickly meaning they had solid evidence to connect them. If they had solid evidence to connect the other two they would have already charged them. To me, that means they do not have enough to do so.
The question if they killed the couple or even the man is going to be up until the court says they did it. Which I hope happens.
We can't say they killed the other two until proven guilty in a court of law.
You're right, police haven't said why, but the suspects were camping in the area IIRC. For legal reasons police don't lightly call people suspects if they are not sure they did the crime.
B.C. RCMP say they’re still working on charging suspects for Fowler, Deese murdersWorking on charges means they are looking for evidence to connect them meaning they don't have enough yet to charge them.....2 weeks later.
ETA: Just think about it...they were charged with LD's death quite quickly meaning they had solid evidence to connect them. If they had solid evidence to connect the other two they would have already charged them. To me, that means they do not have enough to do so.
We don’t have the death penalty!Is it true while we were diligently hunting these two young killers for days on end, that they were getting haircuts at Supercuts, and eating pork chop dinners ? .....Opinion - The death penalty is too good for them....moo
I think it's not only possible but probable
that suit may have significance to him
it was one of the first things he bought with his first 'real' job
it was important to him IMO