The problem I have with some alternative theories on WS is they don’t start with the facts to build a narrative. They are heavy on complicated “what if” stories and light on known specifics. The evidence isn’t coming solely from RCMP. All kinds of people have contributed & tested the emerging picture without coming to conclusions: journalists, photographers, people from all walks of life on WS & many places in the world.
It is a truism that the hardest thing to see can be what is right in front of you. For me, seeing the size of the military response in Gillam shifted the weight of non-publicized evidence to proof, ie, what I don’t know but can indirectly see is happening. Governments don’t spend millions of dollars searching for nice boys.