OutOfTheDarkness
Former Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2014
- Messages
- 1,525
- Reaction score
- 2
Indeed.What can happen when investigators approach a case with a one-track mind: anyone remember the case of Mistie Murray? I knew her and her family. Or from further back, Lynne Harper? (Yet another from my community, most people are more familiar with the name of the accused, Steven Truscott---looks like my area's had our share of talented LE!). Because of LE's gross incompetence, no one will ever know what happened to Mistie, whether it was her father, someone else, or she disappeared willfully. Same with Lynne---rumour is her killer died years ago, never formally accused. LE's hasty actions and dismissal of anything other than what they wanted to believe spoiled the investigations.
Another article about Lynne: http://www.goderichsignalstar.com/2015/01/04/the-search-for-lynne-harper
And something from a time when the CBC used to fire hosts for "unprofessional" behaviour rather than turning a blind eye. (note to self: compassion for women bad at CBC, but abusing them is okay and can be overlooked... :thinking. *By posting this, I'm not asserting guilt or innocence of anyone in SB's case, but emphasizing the potential tragedy that can come from faulty investigation.
... but as you can see here, the possibilities are endless, the case can go cold, and as new cases pour in... with limited resources, what do you do?