I am no where near done reading the full report.... but I wanted to share some thoughts that are going through my mind at this point. And I would be interested where everyone else is at and what your thoughts are too
SA is an



. Period. I am reading so many red flags about others though that I can't help but have reasonable doubt. CA, EA <<< WTH! Most of the things that CA and EA were accused of or charged with was during the time that SA was in prison for the assault on PB. I can absolutely understand the thought process towards this family, it doesn't make it right, and it doesn't mean that SA killed TH, if anything, it gives me more reason to believe that CA and/or EA also had it "in them" to commit this murder too and it creates reasonable doubt.
If there was a rogue LEO who thought maybe putting the bones in the pit would tie SA directly to the murder... planting the key.... planting the blood, it would put the focus on him and away from all the other potential suspects that lived on that property, and there were many! Is it possible that someone else that lived on that property strategically placed the evidence where it was found? That could be it too.
Jodi's various interviews... sorry, I didn't take note of the page numbers, but they are randomly found throughout the document (there are many interviews with her).... one thing that stood out to me was that she admits to him hitting her, pulling her, pushing her, but when it came to sex, if at any time she was uncomfortable or hurting her, he would stop. She also made a comment about wanting him to rip her clothes off and he declined. (that strikes me as odd if he is a rapist/murderer and is accused of raping/torturing/murdering TH.... anyone else?) Oh and... the night he got arrested for DV or disturbance, she said that he pulled her by the arm, and was making her leave the property because the cops were going to come, she said they got in the car and the cops were parked across the street from Avery Rd. <<< were they just sitting there? watching? waiting? it struck me as strange, and I had to wonder if she was drinking and he was trying to get her out of there so they would not find her drunk (was she found in breach of probation that night? it's all becoming a big mushy mess in my head haha)
Teresa's personal life.... I'm happy to see that TH was just a normal 25 year old and was doing her thing

I can see that some of the relationships that she had could have caused some issues, maybe with jealousy. Thinking back to RH's testimony and how he was so sure that SB and TH were just friends, I wonder what he thought when he found out it was more than that.... or maybe he never did? I have yet to see any follow up with RH other than the first few days (again, I'm not done reading). RH seemed to know an awful lot about TH's 'life' though... red flag IMO According to her one friend... TH didn't want to have a relationship with BC but BC kept calling (is he the one that was calling TH all the time?) ... red flag.
This I did take note of... page 360
I informed CANDY I did need to speak with ***** about the accusations of a sexual assault
that may have happened between STEVEN and *****. I provided CANDY with my phone
number. I informed CANDY that the district attorney's office would be willing to have a JOHN
DOE hearing and Subpoena ***** if she did not discuss with an investigator what had
happened between ***** and STEVEN. I informed CANDY, that during the investigation, it
was found out that several people knew STEVEN had sexual intercourse with *****. I
informed CANDY that I would like for ***** to contact me by the end of the week so I could
speak with her.
I have replaced her name with the *****. Is it common to threaten the mother of a suspected victim of sexual assault with something like this? I again had a WTH moment. If you keep reading after this, ***** is interviewed by Baldwin, and there is just something not right about the whole situation. Is there an age of consent law in Wisconsin, does anyone know? The reason I ask is because Baldwin seems to want to connect the 'incident' with her age at the time.
For now... these are some thoughts about the extra information we are getting and is subject to me changing my mind as I keep reading LOL The evidence.... I have had a few :banghead: moments, but need to go back and look at other reports and testimony. I have yet to find anything about the quarry south of the property, anyone else find it?