sissi
Former Member
Again Jayelle's I agree, you are right it can, however, the point being made by the criminologist is that the foreign dna is not found on the panties in any area tested other than the areas where Jonbenet's blood is found. If it was contamination by a factory worker, one would expect it to be in at least another area. The fact that the few markers found under her nails match up to the same markers found in her underwear ,again, disputes the possibility of the dna being from anyone other than the murderer. We mustn't get caught up in the BPD's way of thinking! They made an enormous error, proclaiming the parents as guilty and avoiding exculpatory evidence. At some point, I expect they will be held criminally liable for these deliberate actions.Jayelles said:Except that DNA can co-mingle even if deposited at different times. If I bled onto a hankerchief and it dried and then you bled onto the existing bloodstains on the same hankerchief then what would be extracted would be a mixed DNA sample - i.e. co-mingled blood.