Caylee Anthony General Discussion Thread #116

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #521
No he describd it early on I do think, heck it could have come from the Christmas tree photo in the house. We have it in photobucket. Off cue fast moving are u talkin bout fight on Fathers day?

If George saw all of the things casey and Caylee were wearing the last time he saw them because they were in the car when he picked it up and Cindy got them out, that is what I believe triggered him knowing what they were wearing in the sightings and his talk with Greta. Not actually remembering June 16th.
 
  • #522
  • #523
I know that this is going to be totally out of left field in relation to what is being discussed here, but I just found something that was interesting; at least to me.

Do you all remember the Mike guy (I think it was Mike) that the guy who went to the jail mentioned to Casey? Someone looked up his MySpace account and found that he goes by King Merk on there.

I was just playing around on Google looking at a page of slang words and found this...


murk


* to kill or injure.

eg. I murked that snitch dog.

Submitted by Anonymous, Mar 15 2008.


Maybe it doesn't mean a thing in relation to this case, but it was interesting to me.
 
  • #524
Here are the phone calls:

Casey calls June 6/16

Dad cell 3:03pm
Mom work 4:10
Mom Cell 4:11
Mom Cell 4:13
Mom Work 4:14
Tony 4:19
Jesse 4:21
Mom Cell 4:24
Mom Home 6:32
Voicemail 6:33
Mom Home 7:06
Amy 7:20

June 18th calls all within a minute or so apart:
mom home 12 33
mom cell 12 34
mom home 12 35
dad cell 12 36
mom cell 1 09
mom home 1 11
___
 
  • #525
Wait wait don't we know she got 2 calls on the 15th of July, Tony at 00:13am and Kyle in the afternoon?
There's another phone in play AT&T store pay as you go?
 
  • #526
NO, no. IT's the name on Beaz's umbrella. ANd there is a Lexis publishing in NY, where Baez was supposedly a few days ago. IIRC. Just intrigued me, wondered if anyone else had caught it.


even lawyers mess up .. expose themselves.. jmo I was just watching that on ng also and wondered the same .. good catch.. im sure he was digging for something there.. could be alot of things.. book deals , getting case files to help him with casey's case. etc.. i think he knows its going to be a murder charge sooner or later and getting things started... for info. jmo
 
  • #527
NO, no. IT's the name on Beaz's umbrella. ANd there is a Lexis publishing in NY, where Baez was supposedly a few days ago. IIRC. Just intrigued me, wondered if anyone else had caught it.
They have other NY locations as well logo is on their site does it match?

http://www.lexisnexis.com/about-us/office-locations.aspx

New York City
LexisNexis
125 Park Avenue
Suite 2200
New York, NY 10017
Tel: 212-309-8100
800-437-8674
 
  • #528
I have a hard time swallowing George having any part in a cover up until recently. If you read the affidavit is states that George told LE he was concerned that Casey was "witholding information."
I know he said that, but if it was part of the plan all along...he would. In my scenario, the whole scheme was cooked up. If George were part of the cover up...it would fit that he would say something like that to add to the situation so they would press Casey further on the whole "kidnapping" thing which she eventually gave them after the lies. All planned including the lies. The strange thing is...it is working. As long as Casey says nothing...(they didn't count on the forensics being their undoing)...but no body no case scenario. George being LE at one time would know this.
 
  • #529
I have a hard time swallowing George having any part in a cover up until recently. If you read the affidavit is states that George told LE he was concerned that Casey was "witholding information."
IMO George is, after all, ex-LE, wouldn't he know that by saying such to LE responders it would be very incriminating? Or, say, "SETTING HER UP"!!!!!!
 
  • #530
Here are the phone calls:

Casey calls June 6/16

Dad cell 3:03pm
Mom work 4:10
Mom Cell 4:11
Mom Cell 4:13
Mom Work 4:14
Tony 4:19
Jesse 4:21
Mom Cell 4:24
Mom Home 6:32
Voicemail 6:33
Mom Home 7:06
Amy 7:20

June 18th calls all within a minute or so apart:
mom home 12 33
mom cell 12 34
mom home 12 35
dad cell 12 36
mom cell 1 09
mom home 1 11
___

No cell bill for Cindy after 8th july cut off.
Except maybe the collection letters starting in May/Jun
 
  • #531
goodnight everywser!
 
  • #532
IMO George is, after all, ex-LE, wouldn't he know that by saying such to LE responders it would be very incriminating? Or, say, "SETTING HER UP"!!!!!!

Things happen
 
  • #533
Here are the phone calls:

Casey calls June 6/16

Dad cell 3:03pm
Mom work 4:10
Mom Cell 4:11
Mom Cell 4:13
Mom Work 4:14
Tony 4:19
Jesse 4:21
Mom Cell 4:24
Mom Home 6:32
Voicemail 6:33
Mom Home 7:06
Amy 7:20

June 18th calls all within a minute or so apart:
mom home 12 33
mom cell 12 34
mom home 12 35
dad cell 12 36
mom cell 1 09
mom home 1 11
___


on the 18th Shannon looks like mom might come home for lunch sometimes.. and shes checking ,, jmo
 
  • #534
  • #535
I look at it more as setting the plan up not Casey.
 
  • #536
I'm not sure if it's been asked and answered, but I was wondering, has anyone checked Casey's Myspace page just to peek and see if she has logged in today? I'm sure this was one of the first things she would be interested in...

I know her Myspace is private now, but it should still show the "last login" date... (I would check myself, but I don't have the link to her page)
 
  • #537
I know he said that, but if it was part of the plan all along...he would. In my scenario, the whole scheme was cooked up. If George were part of the cover up...it would fit that he would say something like that to add to the situation so they would press Casey further on the whole "kidnapping" thing which she eventually gave them after the lies. All planned including the lies. The strange thing is...it is working. As long as Casey says nothing...(they didn't count on the forensics being their undoing)...but no body no case scenario. George being LE at one time would know this.

Homicide dick and know it well IMO sorry LEO
 
  • #538
I know that this is going to be totally out of left field in relation to what is being discussed here, but I just found something that was interesting; at least to me.

Do you all remember the Mike guy (I think it was Mike) that the guy who went to the jail mentioned to Casey? Someone looked up his MySpace account and found that he goes by King Merk on there.

I was just playing around on Google looking at a page of slang words and found this...


murk


* to kill or injure.

eg. I murked that snitch dog.

Submitted by Anonymous, Mar 15 2008.


Maybe it doesn't mean a thing in relation to this case, but it was interesting to me.

Doubt it means much. Murk is largely used by D&D and Role-players. In fact, here is a link to a game called MURK

http://www.murk.on.ca/
 
  • #539
  • #540
Sounds like a service an attorney would use. The salesperson probably gave Baez the umbrella.
I agree.
Many atty's use Lexis Nexis (sp) for information.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
70
Guests online
2,382
Total visitors
2,452

Forum statistics

Threads
633,223
Messages
18,638,173
Members
243,452
Latest member
odettee
Back
Top