Cindy's BoA Checking Account

  • #321
bbm

yes, that is how it would work. However, since they had nothing... Half of nothing is... Well, pretty much nothing.

thanks Snaz they certainly have lost everything! I have a ? What year did George leave the police force?
 
  • #322
thanks Snaz they certainly have lost everything! I have a ? What year did George leave the police force?

His job application says he was certified in law enforcement for Ohio in 1975 and spent 10 years on the Warren County force. So ------ 1985, give or take.
 
  • #323
I'll give Shirley a 98% honesty rating (the 2% is just because I'm suspicious of everyone these days).

But Shirley only knows what Cindy tells her.

And Cindy probably lies to Tinker and Horace just because she can.

haha no doubt! It was probably Cindy messing on the floor blaming it on the cat!:crazy:
 
  • #324
:Banane12:WELL I AM OFF TO BED! GOTTA GET UP EARLY TO FEED THE HORSE,DOGS, AN CHIXS. SEE YA FRIDAY! GOOD NIGHT!
 
  • #325
  • #326
I could be wrong but I thought the money GA lost inthe scam was the money he received from his worker's comp. settlement????

As I understood it, he charged it (could be wrong) and then when he got his worker's comp, he used a large portion to pay off his debt and to live on when Cindy told him to leave. But I could be wrong. But I do know that he told FBI he was still in debt as they were speaking.

Here you go:

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/20224461/detail.html

Page 29. George says he maxed out their credit cards to the tune of $10,000. He got a 60,000 settlement and 40,000 came to him, which he used to pay some things back and live on and bought a car and he goes on to say he is still living with the debt - still owes about 1500 to 1800. He says it was never gambling and that is just what he told Cindy; actually it was a scam where he sent "their" money to someone in England.

With all the lying and stealing and cheating this family does, it strikes me that they continue it with reporters, detectives, etc. They are all so use to lying that they think this is going to work with the authorities.

It is going to be interesting to see George on the stand and he WILL have to answer the questions put to him and without telling the prosecutor I do not see the relevance.

It is literally a "house of lies". Incredible.
 
  • #327
After the $3590.85 deposit on 5/6/08 the following electronic transactions took place:

5/7/08 Online banking withdrawal $1,010.91
5/7/08 Online banking withdrawal $ 400.00
5/7/08 Online banking withdrawal $ 300.00
5/7/08 Online banking withdrawal $ 200.00
5/8/08 AT&T payment for Casey $ 574.60
5/12/08 Online banking withdrawal $ 800.00

If that wasn't Casey's doing, I will eat my hat.

This one confuses me.

In ONE day (5/7/08) there are 4 online banking withdrawl transactions totaling $1,910.91. Why was this done in a series of transactions instead of just withdrawing it all at once? Also, I find the first amount curious since it isn't a "round" number. Why THAT particular amount?

I have never "withdrawn" money online. How does that work? I mean, how is that money disbursed? I have only "withdrawn" as a debit card transaction either through an ATM or paying a bill online (as shows up in the 5/8/08 AT&T payment.)

And does this 5/6/08 deposit date in any way correspond the the deposit slip she forged?

I feel like I am totally missing obvious something here....:waitasec:
 
  • #328
This one confuses me.

In ONE day (5/7/08) there are 4 online banking withdrawl transactions totaling $1,910.91. Why was this done in a series of transactions instead of just withdrawing it all at once? Also, I find the first amount curious since it isn't a "round" number. Why THAT particular amount?

I have never "withdrawn" money online. How does that work? I mean, how is that money disbursed? I have only "withdrawn" as a debit card transaction either through an ATM or paying a bill online (as shows up in the 5/8/08 AT&T payment.)

And does this 5/6/08 deposit date in any way correspond the the deposit slip she forged?

I feel like I am totally missing obvious something here....:waitasec:

Some ATM machines have cash withdrawal limits - I suppose that is so that they dont run out of cash.


Dear ATM machine,

Most days you are my friend, but you really suck when you are out of cash.

Just sayin,
Watergirl
 
  • #329
As I understood it, he charged it (could be wrong) and then when he got his worker's comp, he used a large portion to pay off his debt and to live on when Cindy told him to leave. But I could be wrong. But I do know that he told FBI he was still in debt as they were speaking.

Here you go:

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/20224461/detail.html

Page 29. George says he maxed out their credit cards to the tune of $10,000. He got a 60,000 settlement and 40,000 came to him, which he used to pay some things back and live on and bought a car and he goes on to say he is still living with the debt - still owes about 1500 to 1800. He says it was never gambling and that is just what he told Cindy; actually it was a scam where he sent "their" money to someone in England.

With all the lying and stealing and cheating this family does, it strikes me that they continue it with reporters, detectives, etc. They are all so use to lying that they think this is going to work with the authorities.

It is going to be interesting to see George on the stand and he WILL have to answer the questions put to him and without telling the prosecutor I do not see the relevance.

It is literally a "house of lies". Incredible.

I have never heard that CA threw him out. My understanding was that he left and filed for divorce. And did he use CA's credit card, or his own? CA's appears to be in her name only. What he did was wrong but worker's comp. is not "their" money it's in payment for injuries he suffered. So if he left CA that money would go with him. Same thing with CA. She was making the money and it was up to her to manage it. Best way to handle a gambler is to keep your money separate. So if he used her card he was obligated to pay her back from his comp. money. But I never heard that CA threw him out. Never heard he left for another woman but what I did hear was the neighbors saying CA had a male friend who visited the home. They described him as a boyfriend. For the short duration GA was gone from the home it appears CA did not waste any time. Not sticking up for GA just trying to find out if this is speculation or something that was actually reported.

And we can see that KC ran through quite a bit of her mother's money without any one stopping her. Could it be GA had had enough of it and left? Nothing worse than coming between a gambler and his money. Just speculating here. lol jmo
 
  • #330
This one confuses me.

In ONE day (5/7/08) there are 4 online banking withdrawl transactions totaling $1,910.91. Why was this done in a series of transactions instead of just withdrawing it all at once? Also, I find the first amount curious since it isn't a "round" number. Why THAT particular amount?

I have never "withdrawn" money online. How does that work? I mean, how is that money disbursed? I have only "withdrawn" as a debit card transaction either through an ATM or paying a bill online (as shows up in the 5/8/08 AT&T payment.)

And does this 5/6/08 deposit date in any way correspond the the deposit slip she forged?

I feel like I am totally missing obvious something here....:waitasec:

Could these be debit card purchases?
 
  • #331
I just wanted to chime in to remind that one of the great minds of WS (was it JWG? or maybe BJB) sleuthed out the info surrounding the escort websites that had been accessed from the A family computer. It was their opinion that it was likely GA that was responsible for this bit of websurfing.

Which begs the question, what's more embarrassing to admit to LE (or CA) when the subject of his indebtedness comes up. I was stoopid enough to fall for this Nigerian scam or I was lookin' for love in all the wrong places? I can't help but wonder if GA had an expensive habit of getting his ego propped up!
 
  • #332
I just wanted to chime in to remind that one of the great minds of WS (was it JWG? or maybe BJB) sleuthed out the info surrounding the escort websites that had been accessed from the A family computer. It was their opinion that it was likely GA that was responsible for this bit of websurfing.

Which begs the question, what's more embarrassing to admit to LE (or CA) when the subject of his indebtedness comes up. I was stoopid enough to fall for this Nigerian scam or I was lookin' for love in all the wrong places? I can't help but wonder if GA had an expensive habit of getting his ego propped up!

LOL. Apparently he may have needed it when you listen to how KC and Lee talk about how they all treated him. I had seen that when I was younger in a family setting and it is not pleasant for the family member nor is it healthy for the children to be involved in being disrespectful to their father over petty stuff. Mom complains to everyone but does nothing. And nothing breaks a family unit down faster. There had to be a reason CA kept GA around once the kids were grown if he was not contributing. It was not that he would get half of everything because half of nothing is still nothing. They have nothing but bills. In order to save face with her mother maybe CA told her GA would get half of everything if they divorced because she just wanted him back to share the burden of KC. We all know no other man would have put up with it. jmo
 
  • #333
This one confuses me.

In ONE day (5/7/08) there are 4 online banking withdrawl transactions totaling $1,910.91. Why was this done in a series of transactions instead of just withdrawing it all at once? Also, I find the first amount curious since it isn't a "round" number. Why THAT particular amount?

I have never "withdrawn" money online. How does that work? I mean, how is that money disbursed? I have only "withdrawn" as a debit card transaction either through an ATM or paying a bill online (as shows up in the 5/8/08 AT&T payment.)

And does this 5/6/08 deposit date in any way correspond the the deposit slip she forged?

I feel like I am totally missing obvious something here....:waitasec:

Ok ive had more coffee now and will try this one again haha

withdrawal by check

I looked on BofA site but cant seem to find any info there. Maybe it goes something like this? If you get the mail first, I could see this being rather easy.
 
  • #334
I have never heard that CA threw him out. My understanding was that he left and filed for divorce. And did he use CA's credit card, or his own? CA's appears to be in her name only. What he did was wrong but worker's comp. is not "their" money it's in payment for injuries he suffered. So if he left CA that money would go with him. Same thing with CA. She was making the money and it was up to her to manage it. Best way to handle a gambler is to keep your money separate. So if he used her card he was obligated to pay her back from his comp. money. But I never heard that CA threw him out. Never heard he left for another woman but what I did hear was the neighbors saying CA had a male friend who visited the home. They described him as a boyfriend. For the short duration GA was gone from the home it appears CA did not waste any time. Not sticking up for GA just trying to find out if this is speculation or something that was actually reported.

And we can see that KC ran through quite a bit of her mother's money without any one stopping her. Could it be GA had had enough of it and left? Nothing worse than coming between a gambler and his money. Just speculating here. lol jmo

Hooray! :clap: I completely agree, LambChop. It drives me crazy the way CA talks to others making excuses about why SHE CAN'T file for divorce. When in reality, it was GA who filed. Cindy never talks about the fact that it was George who petitioned the court for divorce. :angel: The question is what motivated George to file for divorce. IIRC, they BOTH confirmed that the issues with Casey were the BIG problem between them during that time. They argued constantly about how to deal with Casey. I'm not taking up for George either, but I have always felt he wanted Casey to be held accountable and Cindy just refused. However, being the best martyr she can be, Cindy tells others the stories that shed the best light on HER and elicit empathy.
 
  • #335
Could these be debit card purchases?

When I make debit card or even internet purchases, my bank statement still tells me the "vendor"... if I make ATM withdrawals, it tells me which machine and where it's located. However, when I transfer funds between my bank accounts (I have a brick and mortar account across the street and an online ING account), it says withdrawal and/or deposit and then lists the account number... so I would speculate the money was being transferred and the account information is what is blacked out??

MOO :twocents:
 
  • #336
Could these be debit card purchases?

I don't think so. The notation would not be "online banking withdrawl".

Ok ive had more coffee now and will try this one again haha

withdrawal by check

I looked on BofA site but cant seem to find any info there. Maybe it goes something like this? If you get the mail first, I could see this being rather easy.

Thanks! The only thing is - the check would be made out to Cindy since she is the account holder.
 
  • #337
When I make debit card or even internet purchases, my bank statement still tells me the "vendor"... if I make ATM withdrawals, it tells me which machine and where it's located. However, when I transfer funds between my bank accounts (I have a brick and mortar account across the street and an online ING account), it says withdrawal and/or deposit and then lists the account number... so I would speculate the money was being transferred and the account information is what is blacked out??

MOO :twocents:

BBM

I did consider it could be a transfer, in fact that was about the only plausible explanation I could think of. However, WHY do it over a series of 4-5 transactions? And what account would it be transferred to if this is KC's doings? It is not like she had one in her own name or even jointly with Cindy. kwim?
 
  • #338
BBM

I did consider it could be a transfer, in fact that was about the only plausible explanation I could think of. However, WHY do it over a series of 4-5 transactions? And what account would it be transferred to if this is KC's doings? It is not like she had one in her own name or even jointly with Cindy. kwim?

For some reason I was thinking maybe this was Cindy trying to move her money around so George and Casey couldn't get to it.

MOO :twocents:
 
  • #339
Are we sure it was not to pay bills? If you notice no checks made out for car payments, utilities, food, etc.
 
  • #340
When I make debit card or even internet purchases, my bank statement still tells me the "vendor"... if I make ATM withdrawals, it tells me which machine and where it's located. However, when I transfer funds between my bank accounts (I have a brick and mortar account across the street and an online ING account), it says withdrawal and/or deposit and then lists the account number... so I would speculate the money was being transferred and the account information is what is blacked out??

MOO :twocents:

So you think CA had another account?
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
111
Guests online
1,491
Total visitors
1,602

Forum statistics

Threads
632,359
Messages
18,625,273
Members
243,110
Latest member
dt0473
Back
Top