Cindy's BoA Checking Account

GA is not a suspect so LE did not ask for the information.

Point taken.

But they can ask for them now so I can see them, can't they? ;)

I would almost have to believe, though, they LE would have some interest in GA's finances, especially after seeing CA's records that show how ICA was spending her money. If she was stealing from her mother and grandmother, she would be stealing from her dad IF she could gain access to his money. I would also LOVE to see some sort of paper trail on GA's money. JMO.
 
I would almost have to believe, though, they LE would have some interest in GA's finances, especially after seeing CA's records that show how ICA was spending her money. If she was stealing from her mother and grandmother, she would be stealing from her dad IF she could gain access to his money. I would also LOVE to see some sort of paper trail on GA's money. JMO.

AMSCOT would not have to turn over anything that did not have any direct involvement with GA. KC could fake being CA but not GA. Nothing leads LE to believe KC faked an ID to cash one of GA's checks. Plus I think GA watched HIS money very carefully and probably slept with it. His records would remain private because they were not involved in any crime. jmo
 
AMSCOT would not have to turn over anything that did not have any direct involvement with GA. KC could fake being CA but not GA. Nothing leads LE to believe KC faked an ID to cash one of GA's checks. Plus I think GA watched HIS money very carefully and probably slept with it. His records would remain private because they were not involved in any crime. jmo

I understand your point, and it certainly has merit.

But if LE had no interesting in George's financials, why did they go after his credit card records? I'm merely pointing out that Cindy's records are complete, but George's are not. Why?

And curiosity is killing me. :D
 
I understand your point, and it certainly has merit.

But if LE had no interesting in George's financials, why did they go after his credit card records? I'm merely pointing out that Cindy's records are complete, but George's are not. Why?

And curiosity is killing me. :D

To see if KC was using GA's credit card without his permission I would assume. They are trying to build a case against KC not GA. GA cashing his payroll check has nothing to do with what KC has done. I just think GA knew exactly what was going on with KC, did not like it and wanted no part of it so he cashed his checks and kept an eye on his money. Obviously CA did not care because she did nothing to stop it.

The judge will not sign a subpoena for records that have no bearing on the case. So that is why we are not seeing them. jmo
 
To see if KC was using GA's credit card without his permission I would assume. They are trying to build a case against KC not GA. GA cashing his payroll check has nothing to do with what KC has done. I just think GA knew exactly what was going on with KC, did not like it and wanted no part of it so he cashed his checks and kept an eye on his money. Obviously CA did not care because she did nothing to stop it.

The judge will not sign a subpoena for records that have no bearing on the case. So that is why we are not seeing them. jmo

:truce:

But I still want to see them. Sum ting wong there.
 
:truce:

But I still want to see them. Sum ting wong there.

But what is there to see. He cashed checks for say $750 every week or every other week. What would it prove? Nothing. So the judge would say "no can do, it is not relevant (CA favorite term). What could be wrong? He hands them his check and they cash it and give him the money. What could that have to do with KC? Now if they had a video of her holding a gun to his head...the judge would sign it. In my opinion there would be nothing to see. jmo
 
I would find it hard to be believe that GA had much money to speak of. And, if he did get access to funds, I'm sure he was very protective of it. I'm guessing ICA stole from the easiest sources (CA, Amy), and GA's money would be more difficult to access (as was mentioned earlier ... too difficult for her to steal his identity). I see GA as being a cash kind of guy, since he was on a short leash with CA when it came to money. JMHO.

IIRC, the arrangement between CA and GA was that he paid for utilities and the car insurance. And, I recall that around the time they retrieved the Sunfire from the towing company, CA and GA had both gone together to cash their IRS refund check since both of their names were on it. ICA was already being evasive by that time, so no chance that she had access to that check.

What I don't understand is why CA and GA didn't find it puzzling that ICA didn't file tax returns. With CA's controlling nature, surely she would have bugged ICA until she had proof that it was taken care of. Again, JMHO.

Sorry - just thinking out loud about money coming into the house from various sources.
 
To see if KC was using GA's credit card without his permission I would assume. They are trying to build a case against KC not GA. GA cashing his payroll check has nothing to do with what KC has done. I just think GA knew exactly what was going on with KC, did not like it and wanted no part of it so he cashed his checks and kept an eye on his money. Obviously CA did not care because she did nothing to stop it.

The judge will not sign a subpoena for records that have no bearing on the case. So that is why we are not seeing them. jmo

I suspect it is more that few store clerks would blink at the difference between Casey Anthony and Cindy Anthony on a check or credit card. Especially when the home address on the check and ID match. Whereas KC trying to pay with a check from George would far raise more issues.

Yeah GA most certainly did know what was going on with KC. But we have no signs that he ever took any stops to stop it or that he stepped in at any point to stop anyone including himself from enabling her behavior.
 
I would almost have to believe, though, they LE would have some interest in GA's finances, especially after seeing CA's records that show how ICA was spending her money. If she was stealing from her mother and grandmother, she would be stealing from her dad IF she could gain access to his money. I would also LOVE to see some sort of paper trail on GA's money. JMO.

I wonder about the cash that the 'girlfriend' says she gave him, and what money was deposited into what account after it was donated to 'Kidfinders'...
 
I suspect it is more that few store clerks would blink at the difference between Casey Anthony and Cindy Anthony on a check or credit card. Especially when the home address on the check and ID match. Whereas KC trying to pay with a check from George would far raise more issues.

Yeah GA most certainly did know what was going on with KC. But we have no signs that he ever took any stops to stop it or that he stepped in at any point to stop anyone including himself from enabling her behavior.

Yes, you're right. There was just that one incident where GA said he went to Sports Authority and asked for her and they told him she did not work there. When he told CA, basically he was told to back off she would handle it. I don't blame him for cashing his check instead of depositing it in CA's account. Appears he did have enough sense not to do that. Since it looks as if no utilities were coming out of CA checkbook he may have been paying the bills at the utilities & cable company offices. jmo
 
I would find it hard to be believe that GA had much money to speak of. And, if he did get access to funds, I'm sure he was very protective of it. I'm guessing ICA stole from the easiest sources (CA, Amy), and GA's money would be more difficult to access (as was mentioned earlier ... too difficult for her to steal his identity). I see GA as being a cash kind of guy, since he was on a short leash with CA when it came to money. JMHO.

IIRC, the arrangement between CA and GA was that he paid for utilities and the car insurance. And, I recall that around the time they retrieved the Sunfire from the towing company, CA and GA had both gone together to cash their IRS refund check since both of their names were on it. ICA was already being evasive by that time, so no chance that she had access to that check.

What I don't understand is why CA and GA didn't find it puzzling that ICA didn't file tax returns. With CA's controlling nature, surely she would have bugged ICA until she had proof that it was taken care of. Again, JMHO.

Sorry - just thinking out loud about money coming into the house from various sources.

bbm~

Hi all! I'm just following along here and am curious about the income tax returns. I have not read all the records, so I don't know if Cindy's income tax return would be in there for any reason..My question is..did we ever find out who claimed Caylee on theirs? I haven't read anything either way..so it just really puzzles me..if Cindy did not claim Caylee, I might would believe that at least early on, she may have thought ICA was working..if she DID, then she had to have known that she wasn't working...whether, she admitted that to herself or not is another story..I mean if CA thought ICA was 'working' and filing a return, I would see ICA pitching a chit fit to claim Caylee..that would be $ in her pocket..and if that didn't happen..it shoulda been a Huge Red Flag to Cindy..I do realize I am talking about 'Anthonyland' here, lol..

Wonder if Cindy claimed ICA & Caylee?
 
All I've got to say is, if I did one check on my mom's bank account, I'd be disowned and thrown out on the street. Casey made a freaking LIVING stealing money through checks on her mother's account. I'm just ASTOUNDED at that. Why would anyone put up with that? Did Cindy really think Casey was continually buying things for Caylee or something?

My mind just boggles at this, seriously. Cindy is more off her rocker than I ever imagined. I wonder how she likes keeping her money now? Does she really want Casey coming back and stealing money from her again? I mean that's what she'd have to do as no one in their right mind would ever hire Casey.

Unbelievable. Yeah, Cindy, you handled it alright! You handled it almost to personal bankruptcy because of your own daughter!
 
I agree that GA records would not be relevant to the case. That being said, IMO, the reason he possibly does not have a checking account & uses the check cashing facility is most likely because of the credit card debt. If the creditors are after him they may have leins against his money. I know my sis in law is in terrible debt due to the economy and had to close her cking accs so the creditors didn't confiscate their funds. GA changes jobs so frequently the creditors wouldn't be able to garnish his wages, but they could garnish any deposits made into a checking acc. MOO
 
All I've got to say is, if I did one check on my mom's bank account, I'd be disowned and thrown out on the street. Casey made a freaking LIVING stealing money through checks on her mother's account. I'm just ASTOUNDED at that. Why would anyone put up with that? Did Cindy really think Casey was continually buying things for Caylee or something?

My mind just boggles at this, seriously. Cindy is more off her rocker than I ever imagined. I wonder how she likes keeping her money now? Does she really want Casey coming back and stealing money from her again? I mean that's what she'd have to do as no one in their right mind would ever hire Casey.

Unbelievable. Yeah, Cindy, you handled it alright! You handled it almost to personal bankruptcy because of your own daughter!

I think Cindy wants Casey home at all cost. It doesn't appear Cindy had any real finds and she seemed to live in a fantasy world where Casey was her best friend. In reality, Cindy was just Casey's personal ATM machine and her built in babysitter. She had no respect for Cindy (stealing from her, cursing at her, yelling matches in which the neighbors heard Casey but not Cindy). Shirley summed up their relationship perfectly, "Casey hated Cindy more than she loved Caylee."

As crazy as this may seem, I think Cindy wants another child from Casey so they can start the process all over again. The big difference this time is they will be more financially secure. Can you imagine if Casey is acquitted how much money she would get for interviews. Then if she got pregnant, another round of interviews. Then another after the baby is born.

IMO
 
I don't see how George could have had any of his own money since he'd just started working the security job when Caylee died, and he lost all of his settlement money from a previous on the job injury. I've always been suspicious about that though. Also, has it been documented that Casey was stealing and writing checks on Cindy's account weekly? I thought Cindy knew about her stealing lots of money and was upset when she wrote the facebook message wondering why Casey wouldn't bring Caylee home? Maybe I missed something about the finances. Casey may have taken a credit card out in Cindy's name as well, and the public just hasn't been told about that type of forgery.
 
My thoughts now about this is that CA DOES KNOW NOW what financial debts ICA put in her name with these released BOA documents. And we are just seeing the tip of that iceberg float our way. However, CA also raked in the blood money to pay most if not all of them off. And get tattoos, jewelry, cruises and a remodeled A compound. You can best believe when the trial starts, so will the money for her. She has educated herself to get top dollar now. :banghead: Blood money .... karma will come back to bite her twofold and not in a good way either.
 
All I've got to say is, if I did one check on my mom's bank account, I'd be disowned and thrown out on the street. Casey made a freaking LIVING stealing money through checks on her mother's account. I'm just ASTOUNDED at that. Why would anyone put up with that? Did Cindy really think Casey was continually buying things for Caylee or something?

My mind just boggles at this, seriously. Cindy is more off her rocker than I ever imagined. I wonder how she likes keeping her money now? Does she really want Casey coming back and stealing money from her again? I mean that's what she'd have to do as no one in their right mind would ever hire Casey.

Unbelievable. Yeah, Cindy, you handled it alright! You handled it almost to personal bankruptcy because of your own daughter!

It's a lot tougher than you could ever imagine to kick your own child out on the streets. Believe me, I am no Cindy fan at all. I think she has covered up and lied for Casey ever since Caylee was missing and I can not excuse that, but before that I can empathize with her. When a son or daughter who you have raised since they were sweet baby steals from you and lies to you it hurts. They always have a good story though and you believe them because it's your child and you want to believe them. My sister is 50 years old and has done this to my parents her whole adult life. Just this year my dad told her that he's had enough and she's never allowed at his house again. She's now living with my mom and my mom still has hope for her. I gave up on her a long time ago, but she's not my child.

Anyway, I can see how it can happen that a parent has a hard time putting their kid on the street and keeps giving them another chance.
 
I suspect it is more that few store clerks would blink at the difference between Casey Anthony and Cindy Anthony on a check or credit card. Especially when the home address on the check and ID match. Whereas KC trying to pay with a check from George would far raise more issues.

Yeah GA most certainly did know what was going on with KC. But we have no signs that he ever took any stops to stop it or that he stepped in at any point to stop anyone including himself from enabling her behavior.

See I don't think it would. They both have the last name who is to say that George wasn't her husband? I've used my hubby's checks before without a single question raised, also credit cards that only have his name connected to the account. When I was younger I used my fathers credit card and checks..with his approval for college, books etc.
 
I think a clerk might have noticed more if ICA was using a check of Georges vs a credit/debit card. It wasn't unusual at all for my now 25 y/o son to use my debit or credit card (with permission of course) from around the time he was 16-20 y/o and only once did anyone ever question it! ..and my name wouldn't be confused w/a male name, lol..

Often he would be picking something up for me and occasionally he would ask if he could borrow JC/Penny/Best Buy card or major CC to purchase something and then pay me back when he got paid. Best Buy was the only place that stopped him and at the time I was so irritated because although I was in the car with him, I had been working in the yard and was covered in dirt and did not want to go in..but I knew that they were doing me a favor.

ICA could have easily done some purchasing online where there wouldn't be anyone to check ID for checks or CC..Didn't she pay her cell phone bill with G'ma Shirley's ck online?
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
173
Guests online
653
Total visitors
826

Forum statistics

Threads
626,026
Messages
18,515,851
Members
240,896
Latest member
jehunter
Back
Top