Cindy's BoA Checking Account

  • #561
Red Bold by me - good GRACIOUS.. do you know that is the very first time that has even crossed my mind? I can't believe after two years of discussion, this really vital point has never even occurred to me. It was never said by Amy, Cindy, Tony, Casey, or anybody else in that room, that Cindy even once said "Is Caylee here?" Never. And I never thought about that. Oh my god, I'm so sick right now. :cry:
Plus...she hid in the hallway...out of Casey's line of sight. Now if everything was so hunky dory between the two of them...why be afraid of Casey's response to her visit? It's confusing to me...I can see anger taking hold of Cindy...and wanting to barge into the apartment...but fear? I wouldn't have guessed that. Unless she honestly knew Casey didn't want to see her because of what happened prior to her leaving a month earlier (aka "the fight").
 
  • #562
LA did get some passwords, though I think they were for the computer and websites (MySpace, e-mail)...dunno if he ever got the one for her phone records, although I also think recall him telling LE that he had some phone records but was upset he could not get the content of the text messages.
IIRC, some of the passwords were not correct, didn't CA complain to KC that they tried the ones KC gave them but they did not work, to which KC replied that LA had the right ones?
Need to listen to the jail tapes again for this...ugh.
July 26th phone convo...Lee tells her he has her phone records...but not for the 15th and 16th (I assume July?) Sorry not sure if I could link some random site.

ETA: he does ask her for her pw PRIOR to that...and she gives it (he assures her that they'll bleep it out). So if he has the records "to some extent" and didn't have her pw...how did he get those?

Hope this is ok to link...

http://www.acandyrose.com/caylee_anthony_transcript_CaseyJailCall_072608.htm
 
  • #563
bbm
I'm glad you pointed that out...I saw that but wasn't sure if it was from a legit. Cindy account or one that Casey opened up...:waitasec: I think I am confused.:waitasec: :innocent:

IMO this is an important statement..Casey was MIA from home, yet she managed, again, to get into Cindy's bank account to pay her phone bill and transfer funds (IMO it was Casey) but then we see REVERSALS...done before Cindy caught up with Casey. Cindy accessed her accounts and saw what was happening...IMO...

3 attempts were made to pay Casey's At&T bill in the amount of $377.33
June 27, July 3 2008 and July 10 2008 (posted dates)

Also on July 10, 2008 there was an online Banking Transfer in the amount of $200

The account was hit with 2 NSF charges on June 30 and July 7 2008

All the above funds plus $574.60 posted on May 8, 2008 were reversed and put back into the bank account.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/59182780/Discovery-Pt-1-11022010 page 314

:waitasec:...I think I have that straight...:crazy:

Can't wait to see the SAO lay this all out during trial...

Thank you Intermezzo

I didnt see a reversal for for the June transaction @ $377.33
Hmm.... so would that mean that KC actually owed $951.93 plus July's calls?

Could be Cindy took a stance cos she did change her bank details in March. But she imo didnt try too hard. Looks like the only respite Cindy got from the Casey's parasitic ways was in April. Casey then resorts to stealing from grandma Plesea. That phone bill of hers must get paid, no matter who the victim is. However after Mrs Plesea discovered her account was light to the tune of approx $354.00, AT&T had to refund HER bank. That's why Casey had the large bill of $574.60 which she paid from Cindy's new account.
Absolutely unbelievable.
 
  • #564
July 26th phone convo...Lee tells her he has her phone records...but not for the 15th and 16th (I assume July?) Sorry not sure if I could link some random site.

ETA: he does ask her for her pw PRIOR to that...and she gives it (he assures her that they'll bleep it out). So if he has the records "to some extent" and didn't have her pw...how did he get those?

Hope this is ok to link...

http://www.acandyrose.com/caylee_anthony_transcript_CaseyJailCall_072608.htm

Was her paper bill coming in the mail where LA could have gotten it after she went to jail?

Was part of KC's daily jaunts to the A house related to her checking the mail as well? Hard to believe she would not see the certified mail slip from Johnson's on the front door, if the mailbox is at the front door-Don't remember from when I went by there if their mailboxes are on the street or at the door...though I would imagine they are at the street since CA said they never used the front door and they also did not see the slip.

Easy for KC to drive by, grab the mail, put it back in the box and roll out without having to walk around in front of the house, where neighbors did not report seeing her walking.
 
  • #565
Was her paper bill coming in the mail where LA could have gotten it after she went to jail?

Was part of KC's daily jaunts to the A house related to her checking the mail as well? Hard to believe she would not see the certified mail slip from Johnson's on the front door, if the mailbox is at the front door-Don't remember from when I went by there if their mailboxes are on the street or at the door...though I would imagine they are at the street since CA said they never used the front door and they also did not see the slip.

Easy for KC to drive by, grab the mail, put it back in the box and roll out without having to walk around in front of the house, where neighbors did not report seeing her walking.

The nieghborhood mailboxes are all on the street, grouped together.
Would have been easy for Casey to have taken a sneak peak and lifted what she didn't want her parents to see from the mail.
 
  • #566
Hello WS :)

Casey stole one of her grandmother's checks so she could get stuff for Caylee's birthday party. Her grandmother found out, and that was Casey's explanation-that she needed stuff for Caylee's party. Shirley(Grandma)told Casey she could have just asked her for the money, she decided to let it go. Then Shirley found out Casey had stole more checks from her, IIRC from the account used to pay for her husband(Casey's Grandpa)to be in a nursing home.

IIRC, Shirley didn't want Casey getting away with it that time, I don't understand the time line for this, how long before Shirley knew Caylee was missing that she knew about the checks? But, here we have Casey stealing from her Grandparents for the second time. (Am I right, or making stuff up that SP turned Casey in for that one, she had called the bank, yes? TIA)

Even if Cindy did believe Casey had a job at Universal(or anywhere), believed that 'Zanny'/a nanny took care of Caylee-it had to be clear Casey was living beyond her means or stole and that she had a problem.

In the July 3rd MySpace entry by Cindy she says:

First it seemed harmless, ah, love is blind. A mother will look for the good in her child and give them a chance to change. This mother gave chance after chance for her daughter to change, but instead more lies more betrayal. What does the mother get for giving her daughter all of these chances? A broken heart. The daughter who stole money, lots of money, leaves without warning and does not let her mother now speak to the baby that her mother raised, fed, clothed, sheltered, paid her medical bills, etc.
(snip)
http://cayleeanthony.wordpress.com/2008/07/31/deleted-comments-from-cindy-casey-anthony-on-myspace/

I don't see Cindy being in denial regarding Casey stealing money. Why, when the investigation began, -did she purposely keep or try to keep Casey's 'finances' from LE? I.E. not wanting to turn in all receipts to LE. And, when point blank asked questions about Casey's theft-Cindy has blatantly lied. George has been asked in several interviews about Casey stealing and he has denied that is true. Cindy isn't in denial about that it is just another part of Cindy never being able to tell the truth.

I have to think, at this point-this is what we are dealing with. If she did things to protect Casey, it would make a certain sense but she has done things that LE told her would hurt Casey. She continued to do things she was told would hurt Caylee, things that would hurt her: her very self-yet she continued to lie. It is a lying disease? Or a need to control things so badly that anything will be done or said to keep that (or the illusion)of control?

Cindy had already smelled "death" in the car: she and George had discussed the smell, she had gone back to work after smelling that smell. Whatever she thought that smell was she didn't call LE. When that smell became important was the moment she found out that Casey herself, had not seen Caylee for 31 days. Cindy had to have been believing Casey up until that exact moment. Cindy already thought/knew Casey was keeping Caylee from her. But, at that moment Cindy was worried enough for Caylee that she called 911 and told them two things: (1) she had found out hours and hours ago, that the car smelled like death and two: that her daughter just told her she hasn't seen her daughter in 31 days.

(snip)
What does the mother get for giving her daughter all of these chances? A broken heart. The daughter who stole money, lots of money, leaves without warning and does not let her mother now speak to the baby that her mother raised, fed, clothed, sheltered, paid her medical bills, etc. Instead tells her friends that her mother is controlling her life and she needs her space.

Cindy even knew what Casey "tells her friends" about her "mother." Cindy knew on July 15th, that Casey had been keeping Caylee from her on purpose and to spite her/teach her a lesson. When Cindy got access to Amy's number and Amy was able to say she had seen Casey and knew right where Casey was: Cindy took her opportunity. IMO, here is where she most acts in Caylee's best interests, Cindy says she is being "selfish" in wanting to see Caylee, have Caylee home to sleep in "her own bed" but she says she doesn't care, she just wants to see Caylee. That is when Casey starts in with her "Caylee is probably asleep and we don't want to wake her..." song and dance and Cindy reiterates that she does not care, she is being selfish and she wants Caylee. That is the last time(and maybe the first), imo Cindy's words and actions are in the best interest of Caylee.

As soon as focus was off there being a Zanny, as soon as LE turned their attention to Casey: was imo when Cindy went into cover up mode. And for her to have actively covered the truth, she could not have been in denial. Someone in denial would not think they had to lie about anything, imo. And Cindy was clear enough about the options regarding what had happened to Caylee enough to hire and sent a P.I. to the woods to look for remains.

I think a person in denial would show that behavior in a consistent manner. We would have heard the cops found Cindy, driving to every address Casey had ever given her-knocking on doors looking for Zanny. For a while George and Cindy stated that, they had the kidnappers under surveillance. I'm not an expert by any means but does being in clinical denial include delusions? And, a group delusion at that as they both claimed this to be true.

I thought maybe they wanted to give Casey more time, they figured the nanny story was a lie but that she wouldn't have done anything to Caylee. But, then I come back to the idea that the best and loving thing to do was for Caylee and for her the best thing would have been to co operate with LE. Denial or no denial, would anything cause you to not co operate with professionals who are wanting and who's job it is-to find your granddaughter?

Early on Richard Grund offers his help in finding Caylee. He calls George to make sure nothing he is wanting to do will harm Caylee. George is more than reluctant and when RG asks George why he's not willing to let Richard nor do anything himself to find Caylee...George responds because my wife does not want me to.

The list of people Cindy did not want searching for Caylee: OCSO, FBI, Tim Miller, Richard Grund, George...

The list of people she did want looking for Caylee: Dominic Casey.

Cindy wasn't okay with Casey stealing especially from her, and I agree(ETA: at times agree) with the theory that Cindy was threatening to take Caylee and kick Casey out-maybe Cindy said things she never said before that let Casey know she was serious this time. "Remember words spoken" was part of Casey's answer to Cindy's MySpace entry. But then it is funny that in the 911 call where they are in the car in front of the closed police station Cindy says, "My next thing will be child's thing and we'll have a court order to get her if that's what you wanna play. We'll do it and you'll never...

And the original reason for Cindy's calls were about the stolen car and the stolen money. I think the fight/reason that made Casey "leave without warning" was about money and not(officially and out loud)about Caylee. It could seem that Cindy was threatening the "child's thing" and getting a "court order to get her" for the first time because she says to Casey, "My next thing will be. She is in the car with Casey finally turning her in for what she had threatened before, to make Casey face the consequences for her theft after giving her "chance after chance." And then she tells Casey what her next move will be.

So, if Cindy and Casey had only fought about the money, not Cindy threatening custody-Cindy still knew as per the MySpace entry that Casey was purposely keeping Caylee from her. I suppose she knew by then because it was obvious that is what Casey was doing-and that's why by the time Cindy had her in the car, Cindy was ready to go ahead with the ultimate threat of custody battle. Turning your daughter in for car and money theft would be a first step to gaining custody.

All of this has led me to see that Cindy was worried about Casey being Caylee's mother and did not make her move fast enough. Cindy may have not thought Casey could physically harm Caylee but she thought Casey was capable of being/was an unfit mother.

I appreciate the sleuthing done on this thread regarding the actual finances, I would not be able to blabber my opinion further without taking advantage of the work done by others. Being able to understand the amount of theft by Casey has been enlightening to say the least. Sorry for the long post, after reading the last few pages I started having my own thoughts about Cindy's actions in light of her maybe being in denial. I don't mean my post to be answering or arguing anything other than my own confused thoughts and ideas.

Thank you everyone. :blowkiss:

:cow:
 
  • #567
Hello WS :)

Casey stole one of her grandmother's checks so she could get stuff for Caylee's birthday party. Her grandmother found out, and that was Casey's explanation-that she needed stuff for Caylee's party. Shirley(Grandma)told Casey she could have just asked her for the money, she decided to let it go. Then Shirley found out Casey had stole more checks from her, IIRC from the account used to pay for her husband(Casey's Grandpa)to be in a nursing home.

IIRC, Shirley didn't want Casey getting away with it that time, I don't understand the time line for this, how long before Shirley knew Caylee was missing that she knew about the checks? But, here we have Casey stealing from her Grandparents for the second time. (Am I right, or making stuff up that SP turned Casey in for that one, she had called the bank, yes? TIA)

Even if Cindy did believe Casey had a job at Universal(or anywhere), believed that 'Zanny'/a nanny took care of Caylee-it had to be clear Casey was living beyond her means or stole and that she had a problem.

In the July 3rd MySpace entry by Cindy she says:

First it seemed harmless, ah, love is blind. A mother will look for the good in her child and give them a chance to change. This mother gave chance after chance for her daughter to change, but instead more lies more betrayal. What does the mother get for giving her daughter all of these chances? A broken heart. The daughter who stole money, lots of money, leaves without warning and does not let her mother now speak to the baby that her mother raised, fed, clothed, sheltered, paid her medical bills, etc.
(snip)
http://cayleeanthony.wordpress.com/2008/07/31/deleted-comments-from-cindy-casey-anthony-on-myspace/

I don't see Cindy being in denial regarding Casey stealing money. Why, when the investigation began, -did she purposely keep or try to keep Casey's 'finances' from LE? I.E. not wanting to turn in all receipts to LE. And, when point blank asked questions about Casey's theft-Cindy has blatantly lied. George has been asked in several interviews about Casey stealing and he has denied that is true. Cindy isn't in denial about that it is just another part of Cindy never being able to tell the truth.

I have to think, at this point-this is what we are dealing with. If she did things to protect Casey, it would make a certain sense but she has done things that LE told her would hurt Casey. She continued to do things she was told would hurt Caylee, things that would hurt her: her very self-yet she continued to lie. It is a lying disease? Or a need to control things so badly that anything will be done or said to keep that (or the illusion)of control?

Cindy had already smelled "death" in the car: she and George had discussed the smell, she had gone back to work after smelling that smell. Whatever she thought that smell was she didn't call LE. When that smell became important was the moment she found out that Casey herself, had not seen Caylee for 31 days. Cindy had to have been believing Casey up until that exact moment. Cindy already thought/knew Casey was keeping Caylee from her. But, at that moment Cindy was worried enough for Caylee that she called 911 and told them two things: (1) she had found out hours and hours ago, that the car smelled like death and two: that her daughter just told her she hasn't seen her daughter in 31 days.

(snip)
What does the mother get for giving her daughter all of these chances? A broken heart. The daughter who stole money, lots of money, leaves without warning and does not let her mother now speak to the baby that her mother raised, fed, clothed, sheltered, paid her medical bills, etc. Instead tells her friends that her mother is controlling her life and she needs her space.

Cindy even knew what Casey "tells her friends" about her "mother." Cindy knew on July 15th, that Casey had been keeping Caylee from her on purpose and to spite her/teach her a lesson. When Cindy got access to Amy's number and Amy was able to say she had seen Casey and knew right where Casey was: Cindy took her opportunity. IMO, here is where she most acts in Caylee's best interests, Cindy says she is being "selfish" in wanting to see Caylee, have Caylee home to sleep in "her own bed" but she says she doesn't care, she just wants to see Caylee. That is when Casey starts in with her "Caylee is probably asleep and we don't want to wake her..." song and dance and Cindy reiterates that she does not care, she is being selfish and she wants Caylee. That is the last time(and maybe the first), imo Cindy's words and actions are in the best interest of Caylee.

As soon as focus was off there being a Zanny, as soon as LE turned their attention to Casey: was imo when Cindy went into cover up mode. And for her to have actively covered the truth, she could not have been in denial. Someone in denial would not think they had to lie about anything, imo. And Cindy was clear enough about the options regarding what had happened to Caylee enough to hire and sent a P.I. to the woods to look for remains.

I think a person in denial would show that behavior in a consistent manner. We would have heard the cops found Cindy, driving to every address Casey had ever given her-knocking on doors looking for Zanny. For a while George and Cindy stated that, they had the kidnappers under surveillance. I'm not an expert by any means but does being in clinical denial include delusions? And, a group delusion at that as they both claimed this to be true.

I thought maybe they wanted to give Casey more time, they figured the nanny story was a lie but that she wouldn't have done anything to Caylee. But, then I come back to the idea that the best and loving thing to do was for Caylee and for her the best thing would have been to co operate with LE. Denial or no denial, would anything cause you to not co operate with professionals who are wanting and who's job it is-to find your granddaughter?

Early on Richard Grund offers his help in finding Caylee. He calls George to make sure nothing he is wanting to do will harm Caylee. George is more than reluctant and when RG asks George why he's not willing to let Richard nor do anything himself to find Caylee...George responds because my wife does not want me to.

The list of people Cindy did not want searching for Caylee: OCSO, FBI, Tim Miller, Richard Grund, George...

The list of people she did want looking for Caylee: Dominic Casey.

Cindy wasn't okay with Casey stealing especially from her, and I agree(ETA: at times agree) with the theory that Cindy was threatening to take Caylee and kick Casey out-maybe Cindy said things she never said before that let Casey know she was serious this time. "Remember words spoken" was part of Casey's answer to Cindy's MySpace entry. But then it is funny that in the 911 call where they are in the car in front of the closed police station Cindy says, "My next thing will be child's thing and we'll have a court order to get her if that's what you wanna play. We'll do it and you'll never...

And the original reason for Cindy's calls were about the stolen car and the stolen money. I think the fight/reason that made Casey "leave without warning" was about money and not(officially and out loud)about Caylee. It could seem that Cindy was threatening the "child's thing" and getting a "court order to get her" for the first time because she says to Casey, "My next thing will be. She is in the car with Casey finally turning her in for what she had threatened before, to make Casey face the consequences for her theft after giving her "chance after chance." And then she tells Casey what her next move will be.

So, if Cindy and Casey had only fought about the money, not Cindy threatening custody-Cindy still knew as per the MySpace entry that Casey was purposely keeping Caylee from her. I suppose she knew by then because it was obvious that is what Casey was doing-and that's why by the time Cindy had her in the car, Cindy was ready to go ahead with the ultimate threat of custody battle. Turning your daughter in for car and money theft would be a first step to gaining custody.

All of this has led me to see that Cindy was worried about Casey being Caylee's mother and did not make her move fast enough. Cindy may have not thought Casey could physically harm Caylee but she thought Casey was capable of being/was an unfit mother.

I appreciate the sleuthing done on this thread regarding the actual finances, I would not be able to blabber my opinion further without taking advantage of the work done by others. Being able to understand the amount of theft by Casey has been enlightening to say the least. Sorry for the long post, after reading the last few pages I started having my own thoughts about Cindy's actions in light of her maybe being in denial. I don't mean my post to be answering or arguing anything other than my own confused thoughts and ideas.

Thank you everyone. :blowkiss:

:cow:
Excellent post!!! :clap::clap:Good summary, I so agree!!!
 
  • #568
The nieghborhood mailboxes are all on the street, grouped together.
Would have been easy for Casey to have taken a sneak peak and lifted what she didn't want her parents to see from the mail.

I wonder how many times Casey tried to gain entry into other peoples' mail boxes?? It must have been mighty tempting. She had to be thinking about what goodies might be in those other boxes. I don't think anyone in that neighborhood was safe from Casey.

jmo
 
  • #569
Just thinking out loud here, but here's that July 3rd date popping up again (and again, and again...). I wonder if Cindy didn't check her bank account (online, or via phone??) and see that the $377.73 check had been redeposited. Could this have been one of the reasons for the furious activity of that day?? (or the early part of it, anyway. I'm sure the latter half of the day's argument shifted to "I went to Universal and you were not there" and then finally to "I know where you are and I'm sending Lee after you".) Dunno- just wondering if these bank statement can be compared with what we know took place on July 3rd. :waitasec:

July 3rd...
I agree, either Cindy checked her bank account (she was off on vacation this week) or the BoA notified her of this activity and steps were taken to reverse the charges...I don't think the BoA reversed the charges and NSF's without communication with Cindy.

Cindy IMO was also in a panic to have the girls, especially Caylee, home for July 4th festivities...Cindy wanted to see Caylee...either in person, a cellphone photo of her or to even just talk to her on the phone ..This did not happen..
 
  • #570
July 3rd...
I agree, either Cindy checked her bank account (she was off on vacation this week) or the BoA notified her of this activity and steps were taken to reverse the charges...I don't think the BoA reversed the charges and NSF's without communication with Cindy.

Cindy IMO was also in a panic to have the girls, especially Caylee, home for July 4th festivities...Cindy wanted to see Caylee...either in person, a cellphone photo of her or to even just talk to her on the phone ..This did not happen..

Wonder how BOA feels now that Cindy is saying KC had permission to use that money. If Cindy has said this wouldn't that make it a crime on CA's part to tell the bank KC did not have permission when CA is saying she did? They have told so many lies it is hard to keep them all straight. jmo
 
  • #571
Wonder how BOA feels now that Cindy is saying KC had permission to use that money. If Cindy has said this wouldn't that make it a crime on CA's part to tell the bank KC did not have permission when CA is saying she did? They have told so many lies it is hard to keep them all straight. jmo

I was wondering this as well...a <ahem> friend (now ex-friend), once thought it would be cool for me to pay her bills...

Needless to say, I reported it to the fraud dept of the bank, and they reversed the charges, but, I had to agree to participate in any and all "recovery", including testifying at trial, that she did not have my permission to "use" my account...

So how did CA get past that?
 
  • #572
I was wondering this as well...a <ahem> friend (now ex-friend), once thought it would be cool for me to pay her bills...

Needless to say, I reported it to the fraud dept of the bank, and they reversed the charges, but, I had to agree to participate in any and all "recovery", including testifying at trial, that she did not have my permission to "use" my account...

So how did CA get past that?

I don't know, unless LE said it was part of an ongoing investigation?
 
  • #573
July 3rd...
I agree, either Cindy checked her bank account (she was off on vacation this week) or the BoA notified her of this activity and steps were taken to reverse the charges...I don't think the BoA reversed the charges and NSF's without communication with Cindy.

Cindy IMO was also in a panic to have the girls, especially Caylee, home for July 4th festivities...Cindy wanted to see Caylee...either in person, a cellphone photo of her or to even just talk to her on the phone ..This did not happen..

Do you, without having to search, if any BOA employees are on the state's witness list? I'll check in a minute if you don't know. tia.
 
  • #574
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned or not ... it would be very easy for KC to access Cindy's accounts online and again and again as changes to the account or new accounts were created ... all she would have to do is install a keylogger program which is a small utility program that runs in the background ... it records every keystroke a user makes including passwords, websites visited, etc.
These type of programs are available for free and can be run incognito so an icon does not appear in the sys tray ... a shortcut can be "hidden" somewhere to it so the user would be totally unaware of it ...

All KC would have had to do is google to find a program which I think she is perfectly capable of doing ...

JMHO
 
  • #575
Do you, without having to search, if any BOA employees are on the state's witness list? I'll check in a minute if you don't know. tia.

I just did a quick search and I don't see an agent from BoA listed as a State Witness (in the murder case).
I don't remember if an agent at BoA was interviewed or if LE only requested the bank statements
 
  • #576
Wonder how BOA feels now that Cindy is saying KC had permission to use that money. If Cindy has said this wouldn't that make it a crime on CA's part to tell the bank KC did not have permission when CA is saying she did? They have told so many lies it is hard to keep them all straight. jmo

In the Morgan depo Cindy was asked if Casey had permission and she replied NO.
 
  • #577
I was wondering this as well...a <ahem> friend (now ex-friend), once thought it would be cool for me to pay her bills...

Needless to say, I reported it to the fraud dept of the bank, and they reversed the charges, but, I had to agree to participate in any and all "recovery", including testifying at trial, that she did not have my permission to "use" my account...

So how did CA get past that?

I don't know, unless LE said it was part of an ongoing investigation?

The charges were reversed and the funds put back into Cindy's account before Cindy caught up with Casey on July 15th
 
  • #578
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned or not ... it would be very easy for KC to access Cindy's accounts online and again and again as changes to the account or new accounts were created ... all she would have to do is install a keylogger program which is a small utility program that runs in the background ... it records every keystroke a user makes including passwords, websites visited, etc.
These type of programs are available for free and can be run incognito so an icon does not appear in the sys tray ... a shortcut can be "hidden" somewhere to it so the user would be totally unaware of it ...

All KC would have had to do is google to find a program which I think she is perfectly capable of doing ...

JMHO


Well now, LE did a forensics analysis on the computer and laptop and IF there was a keylogger installed, they are keeping quiet about it. I just think CA wasn't smart in keeping her new password to herself. No doubt she wrote it down in a place ICA had access to. ICA wasn't worried about trying to sniff out passwords from CA with a keylogger. Not sure if ICA was smart enough to know what a keylogger is, kwim. She knew enough to delete history, but not how to entirely wipe it off the hard drive.
 
  • #579
Well now, LE did a forensics analysis on the computer and laptop and IF there was a keylogger installed, they are keeping quiet about it. I just think CA wasn't smart in keeping her new password to herself. No doubt she wrote it down in a place ICA had access to. ICA wasn't worried about trying to sniff out passwords from CA with a keylogger. Not sure if ICA was smart enough to know what a keylogger is, kwim. She knew enough to delete history, but not how to entirely wipe it off the hard drive.

Also, I don't think KC would go through the trouble of downloading anything. Why would she need to - she had been stealing and lying for several years and it was perfectly fine with Cindy. After all she went to her imaginary job every morning for two years and left with Caylee who went to the imaginary baby sitter and that was also fine with Cindy.

And she is a sociopath and they just do when they want to and do not plan, as is clear from all of her actions.

Can you even imagine living like that for a week's time? I can't.
 
  • #580
Wonder how BOA feels now that Cindy is saying KC had permission to use that money. If Cindy has said this wouldn't that make it a crime on CA's part to tell the bank KC did not have permission when CA is saying she did? They have told so many lies it is hard to keep them all straight. jmo

Respectfully Quoted LambChop :cool2:
BBM

You win the award for "understatement of the year" LambChop! LOL.

: to represent as less than is the case
: to state or present with restraint especially for effect


:blowkiss:
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
132
Guests online
967
Total visitors
1,099

Forum statistics

Threads
632,311
Messages
18,624,565
Members
243,084
Latest member
Delmajesty
Back
Top