Again, so much caution is being thrown to the wind in the Mandatory Protection Order by Judge Amanda Hopkins, and I don't think she has any basis for this whatsoever-- including not protecting the daughters, which she clearly stated is required by law-- yet she failed to do so!
Does she need to be reminded that the defendant is accused of viciously murdering his wife, the mother of these daughters, and disposing her body twice, the last time -- in Moffat, about 35 miles from her Chambers?
Comparing the Mandatory PTO's:
For example, I pulled up the PTO from Morphew's previous arrest/incarceration in Chaffee County, and these are the differences I found:
1) Hopkins used Form JDF 440 R10/08.
2) This is not the most current PTO, given Judge Murphy used a Version dated 5 years later or
JDF 440 R 08/13.
3) Hopkins could have named the daughters, as required under the law, and added the disclaimer that the Court was providing for Civil Contact with the named individuals, as shown below (names redacted below), but used her discretion to ignore the law. Seems Hopkins has bought into what Morphew is selling. JMO
View attachment 612282
View attachment 612283