All of this makes total sense. The freezing-- that would do it, honestly, with the feet aspect of this. Body of water, yep. And agreed, if LE thought they knew a certain spot, a camera? And the package with the idea of him checking for
cameras-- what a great point. But the bleaching, that part I'm wondering about. Would sunlight come through a mineshaft? Just checked, not a deep one. But maybe he found something more shallow. And if not a mineshaft, maybe some other structure or form on the property. And/or maybe there are chemicals involved. The thing is, though, we know killers tend not to bury in their backyards, at least the smarter ones avoid it. When they interviewed Osswald, he said BM wouldn't have had the remains on his property. But I mean Gacy did it dozens of times over, it's still very possible, and this post really makes me wonder on it more than ever, with the note about how resistant BM was to "incursions" upon his "property"-- when they were
searching for his missing wife. One would think if there was nothing amiss on the property, he'd be especially welcoming. There was something to hide there. Was it actual remains, or did he fear he just missed some "important detail"? (This post has convinced me that maybe it actually WAS remains. He told Morgan he could hide a body where nobody would ever find it, but he evidently couldn't because he ended up moving the remains. He's either not as smart as he'd like to be or else he
had to move remains because they were located at property over which he was losing control.)
Seeing this in source about human bodies submerged in bodies of water: A body goes into the water, the person sinks. Nature takes its course, there's microbial decomposition and acquatic animals at the remains, skeleton gets disconnected and the parts spread a bit over ocean floor. BUT if body goes in fully clothed, that means socks & shoes, and those block the decomposition process somewhat while keeping these small bones together. Modern shoes are lightweight with foam, and they'll bob up to the surface with remains still inside once the feet are disarticulated from heavier skeletal parts. This whole process can take weeks, but might be talking months or years.
You go out for a walk at your local waterfront or head out on the boat to catch a few fish, and you see a shoe floating in the water. Curious, you pick it up an
cbsaustin.com
Could this also possibly be a part of what happened, with the body weighted down in some more (maybe significantly more) shallow body of water? Suzanne's remains had no bug activity, I'm seeing that this is standard with submerged remains; the "bug activity" is extremely different from the standard, and it's much less extensive. And lack of bug activity would be particularly true with presence of sulfur. There was that reek of chlorine, that was both in the house and the hotel. Maybe it was to mask a very distinctive, powerful, and unattractive odor like sulfur/sulfuric acid. I'm seeing that landscapers will sometimes use it. I still think somehow, sulfur's involved in this. Creepily, Moffat's really close to sulfuric springs, and the stuff reeks. If the victim's remains broke down in such a scenario, we'd probably be seeing a different rate for decomposition for the feet with shoewear involved. But
how would he have retrieved the remains for relocation in such a scenario? This would have to be a very shallow body of water indeed. But many of them in Colorado are, where they have these sulphuric springs, based on what I see. I can't help but suspect sulfur, and a geothermal spring would bleach bones with sun exposure. If he left the property & traveled for this, he did it with a vehicle minus telematics, I would think. The phone was in airplane mode. It's that chlorine smell that makes me wonder, and he dumped his own shoes, too, did he plod through the same malodorous substance that he was theoretically trying to conceal with the chlorine? And all the changing of his shirts is perhaps in hopes that he can get the smell to fade completely.
Am wondering too if (?) the "wrappers" at the McDonalds dump/bank video was Suzanne's phone. Phones from a distance have a shiny type of look to them. They could also themselves be enclosed in wrappers. But it would seem possible, too, the phone ended up in one of the holes he was digging for trees on his property around that time. And was Suzanne's leather journal part of his cost-effective "trash runs"?
All just speculation. But there's this lingering question for me now of why BM would miss the "opportunity" of letting others scour his property-- if there were nothing to hide. Is there some unique feature, somewhat concealed, not obvious... on that property that would have made these scenarios possible? That's the question the original post raises for me, and it's a really great question, jmo.