CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #18

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #481
Wonder where he stays during those trips?

When working for these types of outfits, the company typically puts them up in a local Motel or even an apartment building. They rent out a block of rooms/apts for the workers.
 
  • #482
Simply Caustic gives a great explanation upthread. "Once ya pick em the clocks a ticking" LOL Thanks SC for weighing in. Oh gosh i sound like NG :floorlaugh:

If the glove don't fit, you must acquit...
 
  • #483
Right and that request was PRIOR to us seeing the walmart pic, so it's possible that after the walmart trip was verified , that 6 pm timeline was no longer necessary. tks

they wanted video up until 12 midday monday so I don't get that feeling, unless they were in walmart that whole time
 
  • #484
LE considers their first priority to any future case and will only give info to the family or public if;

1. They think it will bring in new tips
2. The public is in danger
3. It puts pressure on the perp.

It's frustrating to not have more info, but the more I see, the more I think they learned a very good lesson from the Jessica Ridgeway case. Remember, the CBI and Denver FBI field office are also working this one. I'm pretty sure I saw one of the same the FBI guys who searched AS house in the JR case when I saw footage of them searching MR's house.

HI Maude !
So if what you're saying is accurate , then LE has no reason to think
the public can bring in new tips and / or the public is in danger ? Did
I get that right? That's fascinating stuff really and sadly I agree with it .
 
  • #485
Is this strange ?
""5. Dylans last use of his phone was approximately 8pm sunday night

6. LE wanted videos taken between 6pm sunday night and 12 midday monday""

Why is LE looking from 6 pm......if they know via text that Dylan was still ok and apparently where he was supposed to be at 8 pm when he text the friend,, certainly at 7 when he texted mom. So why 6pm ?

Perhaps they really need confirmation of exactly which vehicle MR was driving that night. And perhaps he was driving a different vehicle the following day.
 
  • #486
Is this because of lawsuits?
Does anyone know if an innocent parent or really any innocent POI was cleared when they arrest the real perp and later that SUED LE? For liable or slander or malicious 'attempted' prosecution or something?
I didn't think of that before , but I bet it is why they say no one is suspect/POI.

No, I don't believe so. Simply Caustic's post describes it well but Person of Interest doesn't have a legal definition so I don't think there could be a lawsuit for slander or defamation... meaning it's not necessarily an indictment that LE is suggesting a person's potential involvement or guilt. Just someone who is of interest to LE regarding the case. But subjectively in a case we can all figure out when POI is code for "suspect". So wise not to label anyone either.
 
  • #487
LE considers their first priority to any future case and will only give info to the family or public if;

1. They think it will bring in new tips
2. The public is in danger
3. It puts pressure on the perp.

It's frustrating to not have more info, but the more I see, the more I think they learned a very good lesson from the Jessica Ridgeway case. Remember, the CBI and Denver FBI field office are also working this one. I'm pretty sure I saw one of the same the FBI guys who searched AS house in the JR case when I saw footage of them searching MR's house.

BBM

Welcome!

1st bold - so the public is not in danger; meaning no abductor running around the area when Dylan was reported missing? Or can you explain further?

2nd bold - I am having a hard time comparing how Jessica's case was handled and how Dylan's case is being handled - They held numerous/daily press conferences in Jessica's case. They ruled Jessica's parents out. What "good lesson" did they learn?

TIA
 
  • #488
Are there any family law attorneys posting on the Dylan thread?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #489
Simply Caustic gives a great explanation upthread. "Once ya pick em the clocks a ticking" LOL Thanks SC for weighing in. Oh gosh i sound like NG :floorlaugh:


BOMBSHELL TONIGHT! - Our host Bravo Grace!
 
  • #490
  • #491
Are there any family law attorneys posting on the Dylan thread?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

good question.

I'm interested in knowing if the parents or their attorneys have access to what Dylan said in his statements.
 
  • #492
LMAO i had to throw a little Sue Moss in too. She really does make me laugh.

Oh I love her short little angry legal poems
 
  • #493
R O F L,,,,,,,,, that is breaking news !

Ok but how do we know the dentures really aren't implants. Is that in MSM? Had LE verified that I ask :waitasec: I'll stop now. I couldn't resist. We can use a few laughs here :great:
 
  • #494
BBM

Welcome!

1st bold - so the public is not in danger; meaning no abductor running around the area when Dylan was reported missing? Or can you explain further?

2nd bold - I am having a hard time comparing how Jessica's case was handled and how Dylan's case is being handled - They held numerous/daily press conferences in Jessica's case. They ruled Jessica's parents out. What "good lesson" did they learn?

TIA

Well, I wouldn't bet the farm on no abductor running around. I am no expert, but I would guess that if they really had a lead that it was a possibility, they would say that. If they had nothing that pointed to an abductor, they would probably not want the community up in arms. I don't agree with that philosophy but people shouldn't need law enforcement to tell them to take precautions at all times as if there were an abductor on the loose. Because the fact is, there are abductors on the loose at any time, any where and we should act accordingly.

As for the JR case, the difference might be big city vs small town. The Denver press has moved on to new stories and probably doesn't have a local person on site to dig and pester. In Denver, the press would be relentless until the next big story came along. Also, the Westminster Police Department has dedicated PIO whereas Sheriff down there is probably just using one of their deputies who has some training but not much experience.

As for ruling out the parents, in Dylan's case, if they can't definitively rule them out, they probably won't say they did. The lesson learned was how to run the case as far as releasing information. The CBI and FBI are advising them and I would guess they are giving the same advice as they were in JR case. Give away nothing unless it will gain you something.
 
  • #495
  • #496
I just refuse to believe that Dylan is dead. Do you really believe he is?????
 
  • #497
Since Dylan is still missing, how can LE possibly NOT benefit from help from the community? Or at least, how can they know they would not?

If they had not ruled out "runaway" or a possible accident so quickly, people might have been out walking looking for Dylan everywhere, in case he had become trapped someplace, broken a leg, etc & etc. But LE said very early on this was not possible. What if it were the case? What if he is eventually found in the general area?
 
  • #498
I find it odd that MR always says about walmart and getting somthing to eat, but I've not heard once about when they got back how he put groceries away or anything else about that night, or for that matter the morning other than what he said about trying to wake Dylan.

theres a glaring big gap between walmart and 7.30am IMO WHY

I admit that I haven't been able to follow this case 100% and may have missed alot but I do check in at the end of the day. However, I'm still curious as to any evidence of MR's errands that day, where was he, who saw him, any video, anything???
 
  • #499
I just refuse to believe that Dylan is dead. Do you really believe he is?????

I don't want to believe he is dead, but I cannot think of any believable scenarios in which he is alive and fine. :cry: :rose:
 
  • #500
I just refuse to believe that Dylan is dead. Do you really believe he is?????

No one wants to believe that. But the options are very, very few, at least viable ones. We can all invent scenarios where he is being secretly cared for a kind old granny-type who felt sorry for him, but it is not believable. For me, the only option that is likely to have him still be alive is one that is almost as horrible as if he is not. I think it is far too long for any credible "custody" issue and never believed that anyway.

I would love to hear a real possibility that could have Dylan alive and safe and soon to be home.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
134
Guests online
2,337
Total visitors
2,471

Forum statistics

Threads
632,168
Messages
18,623,095
Members
243,042
Latest member
1xwegah
Back
Top