CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #25

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think ER is being coached in what to say. I think her words about not thinking MR could not harm Dylan are more a type of self preservation than anything about MR. She has to think that, just like Desiree said for months and months that she thought TH only gave Kyron to someone. JMO

I think you are probably right. She wants to believe that her baby is out there alive and will come home someday so she has to ignore her initial fear that MR harmed him.
 
By not even talking to the mother of his children let alone CR, (we don't know about his other children) shows me he has no empathy.
 
He's said he tried to talk to her but it didn't happen. How is this all his fault??? He stated they should be working together, they should be a unit to find Dylan, that was around the time she went on national tv and accused him of doing something to the kid. It just seems these two people can not get on the same page. No wonder they couldn't stay married. Now she wants to play nice. And the media is eating all this up. Where is the focus on Dylan??? I want to hear more about him, not about them.
 
Well, yes, yes I do :) Look up one post. It is an interesting interview and really makes me wonder what the heck is going on :waitasec:

Salem

To add to it, if you look under the news section on the new Hope for Dylan Redwine website, the video of her ABC interview has been edited to take out her original statements of accusation. I think this link will take you right to the video on the site -

http://finddylan.com/newstoday/good-morning-america-video
 
He's said he tried to talk to her but it didn't happen. How is this all his fault??? He stated they should be working together, they should be a unit to find Dylan, that was around the time she went on national tv and accused him of doing something to the kid.

That was a sign of guilt.
 
To add to it, if you look under the news section on the new Hope for Dylan Redwine website, the video of her ABC interview has been edited to take out her original statements of accusation. I think this link will take you right to the video on the site -

http://finddylan.com/newstoday/good-morning-america-video

Thanks, Cheese. That is very strange, why would they selectively remove that part of the video?

Not to sleuth ER but is she backtracking?
 
Interesting, isn't it? Because she did NOT repeat herself. She is now saying she doesn't believe MR is involved. While I agree it is easier to attract flies with honey, instead of vinegar, I am a bit confused as to why she basically retracted (imo) her original statement. I just really feel she didn't have to, or need to. She could have let it be. Now it is hard to know what she is really thinking - maybe that was the intended result?

Salem

Strictly MOO but I believe the above BBM to be the likeliest reason, but again jmo..

IMO if MR were to be out at the forefront being a voice for his son and ensuring that Dylan's name and face be kept in the media thus keeping the fact that his son REMAINS MISSING AND NEEDS TO BE FOUND in the forefront of the community and public's mind.. <<---if that was the case I do believe many would be much more open to the possibility that someone OTHER THAN MR is involved and responsible for Dylan's "disappearance".jmo, tho..

To explain further what I mean for me personally why I find it extremely troubling and more than bothersome that MR has chosen this present course of non-action in his laying low, ZERO communication with Dyaln's immediate family members(namely ER and CR), and his downright refusal to be his son's voice speaking out publicly in reminding everyone that his son IS STILL MISSING AND HAS NOT BEEN FOUND..and that he, as Dylan's father will not stop until Dylan is found and brought home!!

The reason the above is even more so troubling is the fact that MR IS VERY TRULY THE ONLY INDIVDUAL ON THIS ENTIRE PLANET who literally knows whether he is involved in why Dylan is no longer here... MR IS THE ONLY ONE WHO KNOWS THIS FOR CERTAIN.. AND in my knowing that MR is the only one who truly knows ITS MORE THAN EXTREMELY TROUBLING due to *IF* HE isn't involved, then he damn well knows his son has in fact been abducted and for this father, this daddy to be the only person on this earth that genuinely knows, without doubt that his son has in fact met with foul play...yet he blatantly continues TO IN NO WAY WHATSOEVER BE OUT THERE AS AN ADVOCATE FOR HIS SON(who again UNLIKE ER/CR he KNOWS FOR FACT that Dylan's been abducted) much different he refuses to even speak out one syllable of a word for his youngest son, Dylan who he knows without a shadow of a doubt is/was in extreme danger being abducted, and quite possibly already deceased...yet he is unwilling to do anything to seek out and find who has taken his son, what's been done to his son, and where his son is now...

For me this is one of the issues that there quite frankly is zero excuse for..ZERO..ZIP..ZILCH!!!!

MOO!
 
I'm sorry, I must have missed this, where did you see him stating this? Thanks!

Oh that's right. According to MR, Dylan took a fishing pole and must have drowned in the lake.

Sorry for the snark. Sometimes it is hard to sigh and read and post and agree to disagree and all that.

It's Saturday night again- scotch neat, right? Tonight I think I'm opting for a Sam Adams. Goes better with chili and football.
 
I believe Elaine knows exactly what she's doing.

SmoothOperator, I couldn't agree more with what you just said!! IF MR didn't do anything then he is the only one on this planet that is 100% sure that Dylan was abducted by someone. Why is he not looking for this someone? Why is he not speaking out in the media to keep his sons name and face out there? IF Dylan was abducted he could still be alive and being held captive. If that's the case, keeping him in the public eye is of utmost importance. Why aren't you doing anything to find your son MR?
 
Oh that's right. According to MR, Dylan took a fishing pole and must have drowned in the lake.

Where did he state this to be a fact? Thanks!

My recollection is that MR has never publicly stated that he knows for a fact whether Dylan is in the lake or has been kidnapped or anything.
 
Link to what? I am saying ER has never said this statement. In fact, quite the contrary...and until she says otherwise, I will not consider other scenarios than one involving MR.

Link supporting what ER has said? Here
http://abcnews.go.com/US/missing-boys-mother-suspects-husband-sons-disappearance/story?id=17813458
Do you have a link to that? Thanks

http://www.kktv.com/home/headlines/Family-of-Missing-Teen-Not-Giving-up-Hope-186259192.html


"I’ve always believed someone has him,” Elaine said Wednesday night. “I am pleading to whoever has him or knows what happened, let us know."
 
Again, I believe Elaine knows exactly what she's doing. It is purposeful.

If my child went missing when I sent him to visit his father the first thing I would do is lash out at the father. But once reality set in that I may not see my child again, I would want to talk to his father and get some questions answered. I would want to know exactly where they went, what their exact conversations were, what my son ate....anything and everything that might give me a clue as to what happened to my son. Did Dylan mention talking to any strangers on the plane or in the airport? Was anyone watching him at McDonalds? Did he talk to any strangers at Walmart? Was he in a good mood? What did you buy him at Walmart? How did he react when you wouldn't let him go to his friends that night? Was his phone working at your house? Did he use your computer? Etc etc etc. I would want to know every detail of the last hours of his life (possibly). The only way she can get those answers is to talk to his father. And the least MR can do is give her that!!
 
I believe Elaine knows exactly what she's doing.

SmoothOperator, I couldn't agree more with what you just said!! IF MR didn't do anything then he is the only one on this planet that is 100% sure that Dylan was abducted by someone. Why is he not looking for this someone? Why is he not speaking out in the media to keep his sons name and face out there? IF Dylan was abducted he could still be alive and being held captive. If that's the case, keeping him in the public eye is of utmost importance. Why aren't you doing anything to find your son MR?

That is a good point, and such an obvious one. The same could be said for the other unsolved cases of Lisa, Isabel, Ayla, and others. The parent or parents ARE the only ones who know for sure if their child was truly abducted. And yet none of them want to talk about it. What does that say, what can it mean, how can it be construed in a positive light of their wanting to find their child?
 
I don't know about other parents on here, but if my child were missing? OH MY GOD I would do anything and everything in my power to get my child's face and name in the media. I would never ever stop. I would be contacting every newspaper, every television station, every talk show host, every reporter on this planet. I think in the beginning most parents tend to sit back and let LE do their job. But when it seems LE is getting nowhere they realize this and take matters into their own hands (as much they can). I do believe this is the point that Elaine is at.
 
I don't know about other parents on here, but if my child were missing? OH MY GOD I would do anything and everything in my power to get my child's face and name in the media. I would never ever stop. I would be contacting every newspaper, every television station, every talk show host, every reporter on this planet. I think in the beginning most parents tend to sit back and let LE do their job. But when it seems LE is getting nowhere they realize this and take matters into their own hands (as much they can). I do believe this is the point that Elaine is at.

When would you stop?
 
Very seldom you see a parent back away like this so soon into a missing child case, IMO. No matter if MR has come to believe that Dylan is dead (assuming he is innocent) he HAS to be found and someone has to pay. I struggle with an innocent parent behaving in this way, no matter how "sensitive" their feelings may be about what may be said about them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
134
Guests online
595
Total visitors
729

Forum statistics

Threads
626,339
Messages
18,524,566
Members
241,023
Latest member
EgoRex
Back
Top