I just wanted to clarify something here. Just because some of us refuse to accuse MR of murdering his son based on what is known at this time (by the public, who knows what evidence LE has?), that doesn't necessarily mean that we believe he has to be innocent.
I happen to be the kind of person who likes to base my opinions on facts rather than intuition. If I have a problem with my computer, for example, I look at all possible causes of the problem, figure out how likely each is, and try to rule them out one at a time until I determine which one is correct. I do the same thing when I have car problems, when one of my birds seems under the weather, when my own health seems to be deteriorating, and most other things in my life.
In my mind, pretty much every scenario involving MR has been brought up at least once, and most many more than once. I'm not saying that one of those ideas isn't correct, but I personally feel the need to look at all of the possible scenarios that don't involve him too (although I won't post those that violate TOS) before I'm willing to decide which one is the most likely. Even doing things my way will obviously not always come up with the correct answer, but I'll at least feel like I looked at it from all sides.
Not everybody needs to do things like I do; I'm terrible at making decisions most of the time for the same reason. I'm usually willing to change my mind if I'm presented with solid evidence that I'm wrong, but I'm also usually satisfied with my decisions once I do make one. MOO