MR has spoken with authorities and cooperated with the investigation. His willingness to have a "sit down" with family he has a bad relationship with - when they don't believe him, want to extract a different story from him - is not significant.
Aren't there examples of parents of missing children being extremely vocal in the media, assisting in searches, etc that were ultimately found guilty of the crime? I think MRs lack of public activity does not correlate to potential guilt for the disappearance.
MSM has confirmed the house and both vehicles were searched, no evidence found or was shared with the public. This leads me to believe a crime didn't occur in the car/house. Dylan was last heard from at 8pm via text: was it confirmed that the last text Dylan sent was from his Dad's house? Was there evidence that Dylan made it to MRs home at all that night?
Next, MR's alibis for his morning errands check out. So we have a time gap overnight/early morning.
Possibilities that include MR: both of my theories require leaving the premises and exiting the vehicle - given that no evidence was found in either. There is only one crime scene since the body was not transported by MR's vehicles.
1. After the 8pm text, MR takes Dylan somewhere, gets out of the car and does something - Dylan would be found nearby .
2. Instead of going back to sleep in the morning, Dylan actually goes with MR and they get out of the car and something happens, after which MR continues on to his appointment.-- Dylan would be found between MR's home and his furthest appointment (lawyer's office?) I think this is less likely because if Dylan agreed to get up and go with MR, his texting would have started up again.
If you remember, LE asked any businesses along the main road to share any surveillance video they had that showed the street. I think LE is trying to see if MRs car is spotted in the area outside of when he left for his errands.
The options not including MR are already listed in another post: wild-life, accident, hit and run, stranger/semi-stranger abduction. Given the lack of evidence so far of MR's involvement (other than he was the last known person to see Dylan) I'd like to know the rest of the POIs LE is thinking about. Local sex offenders, anti-social young adults nearby, groups of transient workers in the area at the time etc etc.
Aren't there examples of parents of missing children being extremely vocal in the media, assisting in searches, etc that were ultimately found guilty of the crime? I think MRs lack of public activity does not correlate to potential guilt for the disappearance.
MSM has confirmed the house and both vehicles were searched, no evidence found or was shared with the public. This leads me to believe a crime didn't occur in the car/house. Dylan was last heard from at 8pm via text: was it confirmed that the last text Dylan sent was from his Dad's house? Was there evidence that Dylan made it to MRs home at all that night?
Next, MR's alibis for his morning errands check out. So we have a time gap overnight/early morning.
Possibilities that include MR: both of my theories require leaving the premises and exiting the vehicle - given that no evidence was found in either. There is only one crime scene since the body was not transported by MR's vehicles.
1. After the 8pm text, MR takes Dylan somewhere, gets out of the car and does something - Dylan would be found nearby .
2. Instead of going back to sleep in the morning, Dylan actually goes with MR and they get out of the car and something happens, after which MR continues on to his appointment.-- Dylan would be found between MR's home and his furthest appointment (lawyer's office?) I think this is less likely because if Dylan agreed to get up and go with MR, his texting would have started up again.
If you remember, LE asked any businesses along the main road to share any surveillance video they had that showed the street. I think LE is trying to see if MRs car is spotted in the area outside of when he left for his errands.
The options not including MR are already listed in another post: wild-life, accident, hit and run, stranger/semi-stranger abduction. Given the lack of evidence so far of MR's involvement (other than he was the last known person to see Dylan) I'd like to know the rest of the POIs LE is thinking about. Local sex offenders, anti-social young adults nearby, groups of transient workers in the area at the time etc etc.
