CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #31

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #421
  • #422
It might be too late for SAR dogs but not for cadaver dogs. They can pick up the scent of human decomposition for many many years. Some cadaver dogs are trained to pick up the scent in water also.

What could it hurt? One dog team is not going to be able to cover that much ground. Get them all out there!

Police already tried dogs. Doesn't sound like that was a big success.
 
  • #423
I wonder why Dylan slept on the couch if he had a bed
 
  • #424
  • #425
LE has stated there was no activity on Dylan's cell phone after Sunday night but they will not state when it shut off. I think it's obvious by activity they mean texts, calls etc. I think everyone is talking about two different things. ACTIVITY AND SHUT OFF and they are different.
 
  • #426
LE has stated there was no activity on Dylan's cell phone after Sunday night but they will not state when it shut off. I think it's obvious by activity they mean texts, calls etc. I think everyone is talking about two different things. ACTIVITY AND SHUT OFF and they are different.

Lets think about it this way. We know NR was sending Dylan texts starting early Monday morning. So if the phone was on, there should have been activity on it-incoming texts.
But there was not since Sunday evening.
 
  • #427
This has already been posted numerous times. Bender is on quote saying there was no activity on the cell phone whatsoever since Sunday evening sometime. While we can debate whether no activity means no pinging, I am pretty sure any cell messages on Monday can be safely ruled out.

"BENDER: My understanding is -- and our investigators have checked his cell phone. Also, cell phones have GPS`s, so if they`re turned on, that gives a general location of the person. And we have been following up on those right along, and there`s been no activity on his phone whatsoever since Sunday evening sometime."

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1211/28/ng.01.html



I know that I'm not as up on what the norm is here, so forgive me if I'm asking a stupid question, but at some point, if we have actual _quotes_ from people relevant to the case, and in a position to give a statement, as presumably Office Bender is, do we agree to accept them?

I mean, we know he said it, because we have a video and a transcript.

I'm really not trying to be rude, I'm just not understanding what all of this debate is about.

Thank you.
 
  • #428
Police already tried dogs. Doesn't sound like that was a big success.

Maybe start the dogs somewhere other than the house. Maybe near the bridges that LE searched
 
  • #429
Police already tried dogs. Doesn't sound like that was a big success.

Seriously? They had dogs at the Lake and Marks to my knowledge. There are miles and miles of places around the area where he could be and need to be searched by cadaver dogs.

I am not talking about search and rescue dogs. Remember these are differently trained dogs. I'm not sure what this woman with Sadie has but most have both.
 
  • #430
This has already been posted numerous times. Bender is on quote saying there was no activity on the cell phone whatsoever since Sunday evening sometime. While we can debate whether no activity means no pinging, I am pretty sure any cell messages on Monday can be safely ruled out.

"BENDER: My understanding is -- and our investigators have checked his cell phone. Also, cell phones have GPS`s, so if they`re turned on, that gives a general location of the person. And we have been following up on those right along, and there`s been no activity on his phone whatsoever since Sunday evening sometime."

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1211/28/ng.01.html

Yes, I agree. No cell activity (unspecified whether texts/calls or pings) Sunday evening sometime. Not no cell activity after 9:37. Not definitively no pings after 9:37. Not definitively no pings since sometime Sunday evening.

And yes, it's been posted numerous times by numerous people. Doesn't matter. I'm not going along with it. I'm going to wait until definitive, specific information comes from what I consider to be a reliable source.
 
  • #431
I tend to agree. He at the very least had a cell phone (with service) and an iPod with texting capabilities. I don't see any way he would have not contacted his friends Monday morning if he was able to.

**just a brief correction to your last sentence though. We don't know when the cell phone was shut off.

At 8:01 Dylan (or Dylan's cell phone) started a texting conversation with RN. There were several back and forth texts without any time stamp after the first text at 8:01. There could have been up to 9 minutes of lag time (or more) in between each text. So technically this conversation could have gone on until approx. 9:30 pm (if Ranch did the math right). Or if they were fast responses it could have been over by say 8:10 or so. We just don't know.

Here from the Nancy Grace transcripts:
O`DONNELL: Right, well, the boy was last seen at 11:30, the father told investigators that he started his search on his own for about four hours, didn`t report him missing until the early evening on that Monday. The most bizarre thing about this case, though, Nancy, is that Dylan, a prolific texter as most 13-year-old boys are who have cell phones -- his phone was not used since 8:00 p.m. Sunday night. His phone was not even on after 8:00 p.m. Sunday night.

I have a hard time believing that these type of statements are merely assumptions. imo the statements were made with information first obtained from LE. But I agree that without any direct information from LE on this, it's impossible to know without a doubt. Therories are all any of us have.
 
  • #432
Lets think about it this way. We know NR was sending Dylan texts starting early Monday morning. So if the phone was on, there should have been activity on it-incoming texts.
But there was not since Sunday evening.

That is a very good point IF his phone was in an area that was able to receive texts.
 
  • #433
I know that I'm not as up on what the norm is here, so forgive me if I'm asking a stupid question, but at some point, if we have actual _quotes_ from people relevant to the case, and in a position to give a statement, as presumably Office Bender is, do we agree to accept them?

I mean, we know he said it, because we have a video and a transcript.

I'm really not trying to be rude, I'm just not understanding what all of this debate is about.

Thank you.

Bender is an official spokesman for the police.
 
  • #434
Here from the Nancy Grace transcripts:
O`DONNELL: Right, well, the boy was last seen at 11:30, the father told investigators that he started his search on his own for about four hours, didn`t report him missing until the early evening on that Monday. The most bizarre thing about this case, though, Nancy, is that Dylan, a prolific texter as most 13-year-old boys are who have cell phones -- his phone was not used since 8:00 p.m. Sunday night. His phone was not even on after 8:00 p.m. Sunday night.

I have a hard time believing that these type of statements are merely assumptions. imo the statements were made with information first obtained from LE. But I agree that without any direct information from LE on this, it's impossible to know without a doubt. Therories are all any of us have.

Well we know that this is not true because we have seen the texts between him and RN starting at 8:01.
 
  • #435
Yes, I agree. No cell activity (unspecified whether texts/calls or pings) Sunday evening sometime. Not no cell activity after 9:37. Not definitively no pings after 9:37. Not definitively no pings since sometime Sunday evening.

And yes, it's been posted numerous times by numerous people. Doesn't matter. I'm not going along with it. I'm going to wait until definitive, specific information comes from what I consider to be a reliable source.



Should we consider Officer Bender a reliable source? I recall at least one poster here saying that they knew him and thought very highly of him, but I know that's not exactly unbiased.

I've been trying to give local LE the benefit of the doubt, but maybe I should be?
 
  • #436
GRACE: OK, so that`s normal. What about the cell phone and the backpack and other belongings?

REDWINE: It was my understanding from his dad that everything Dylan had was in his backpack including his cell phone, his iPod, his iPod charger, his cell phone charger, all of his clothes. So we had to actually make a trip to get some of Dylan`s clothes from where we live in Colorado Springs because it was my understanding there were no clothes at his dad`s house.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1212/03/ng.01.html

so was it Mark's ipod that was taken in the search of his property?

must have been.....

Huh? Where are you reading that?

See TxJan's post above - Mark said everything in Dylan's backpack
Mark said ipod taken from house
so, it must have been Mark's?
 
  • #437
Bender is an official spokesman for the police.


Sorry. I was writing while you were posting. That's what I thought - that he was a police department spokesperson, and had accurate information on the case, but now I'm thinking that maybe I was wrong.

Thanks.
 
  • #438
  • #439
[/B]

Should we consider Officer Bender a reliable source? I recall at least one poster here saying that they knew him and thought very highly of him, but I know that's not exactly unbiased.

I've been trying to give local LE the benefit of the doubt, but maybe I should be?

Please show where Bender said there was NO cell activity after 9:37pm Sunday to include no incoming texts such as R's texts -

Ryan: Just come around to were the sliding door is were that room is and knock on it and i will wake up

Ryan: (Time 9:27 p.m. Nov. 18) Call me when you get here too
 
  • #440
O/T: if anyone was following the case of Sarai Sierra missing in Turkey she has been found deceased (stabbed from the early reports coming out of Turkey)
[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=8795724#post8795724"]Found Deceased Turkey - NY mother Sarai Sierra, 33, 21 Jan 2013 - Page 23 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
142
Guests online
2,324
Total visitors
2,466

Forum statistics

Threads
633,248
Messages
18,638,518
Members
243,457
Latest member
Melsbells42
Back
Top