cluciano63
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2010
- Messages
- 41,198
- Reaction score
- 27,341
If Er is to be accused of saying inaccurate things, please post a link.
Uhhhh. Maybe you misunderstood. The NIGHT ER got there (around midnight from C. Springs) ... LE and LPSAR were out looking with bloodhounds up and down CR 500 Monday night and into Tuesday.
http://www.laplatasar.org/www/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=21&Itemid=46
ER couldn't have seen any footprints anywhere when she got there after/around midnight. IMO. I cannot believe ER would say such a thing. Sounds like one of her "friends" made something up. IMO.
Here's the video from the search of MR home: Watch. Show me where there is any "dirt/soil/sand" along the PAVED road?
http://www.durangoherald.com/article/20121129/NEWS01/121129570
I've been there twice/looked there/there is no dirt that would hold a footprint, etc. IMO.
That page is a nightmare for me anytime. I know computer hardware and software backwards and forwards, but I am so Facebook challenged. Probably a mental block.Have you got a link as finding anything on that page is a nightmare on my phone? .
Thank you![]()
Where has ER stated inaccurate info ?
I would love to see this as I had no idea !
The first one that comes to mind is from the NG transcript and polygraphs.
1. MR failed.
2. Did not know if he took one.
3. She passed but they only asked questions to see if she was a good candidate.
4. MR's inconclusive.
5. Did not tell NG producers MR failed.
I was scratching my head as I did not know which version of her versions I should take as fact.
Looking for footprints is not the same as finding them.
I would probably still be looking for them, even though in vain.
The first one that comes to mind is from the NG transcript and polygraphs.
1. MR failed.
2. Did not know if he took one.
3. She passed but they only asked questions to see if she was a good candidate.
4. MR's inconclusive.
5. Did not tell NG producers MR failed.
I was scratching my head as I did not know which version of her versions I should take as fact.
I try not to compare cases, but I always thought Mickey was the victim of an abduction.
A number of things had to happen, IMO, for Dylan to be in the path of an an abductor (and no one else, apparently). He did not take his ride as planned, then he did not use his phone or any other method of contact, apparently. He did not live in that house and was not there often. As far as I know, this trip was not planned long in advance and he does not seem to have been seen upon arrival at the house by anyone at all. When a child is on a visit to a non-custodial parent, they probably are not often alone. So there is no reason to think anyone with aspirations to take him could expect to find him so vulnerable, IMO. If indeed he was awake long enough to take cereal and watch TV, I find it very hard to believe he would not have made efforts to contact his friend, or his mother who would probably have the phone numbers of his friends. He did not leave a note saying he had decided to go on to Bayfield and not wait for his ride.
For him to gather up his things, on a Monday morning, and not be seen by a soul but apparently walk straight into the arms of a predator just involves a lot of circumstances for me. As far as Mickey goes, nothing good happens at 2am as they say.
I do not say it is impossible, just that it ranks behind every other scenario for me at this time.
I am looking around the house in that video, and the area down the street that the camera got. There is gravel in the driveway (could be decomposed granite), dirt in the front yard, leaves and dead grass, each of which could show foot prints or foot paths. Yes, the road is paved, but the grass, dirt and leaves on the side of the road are not paved and (at least when I was taught tracking) usually show evidence of someone walking on them (grass is crushed, leaf piles disturbed in a certain way, scuffs on the dirt, etc). Was there nowhere from the front door of the house, continuing down the road, where someone would walk on the grass, or dirt or leaves? It looked like there was, but with all the equipment, it is hard to tell.Uhhhh. Maybe you misunderstood. The NIGHT ER got there (around midnight from C. Springs) ... LE and LPSAR were out looking with bloodhounds up and down CR 500 Monday night and into Tuesday.
http://www.laplatasar.org/www/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=21&Itemid=46
ER couldn't have seen any footprints anywhere when she got there after/around midnight. IMO. I cannot believe ER would say such a thing. Sounds like one of her "friends" made something up. IMO.
Here's the video from the search of MR home: Watch. Show me where there is any "dirt/soil/sand" along the PAVED road?
http://www.durangoherald.com/article/20121129/NEWS01/121129570
I've been there twice/looked there/there is no dirt that would hold a footprint, etc. IMO.
This has always been my view on that was Elaine was told not to say anything and then Nacy backed her into a corner and then she had to say something .
Coz did Nancy not mention that she had over heard Elaine say something in the hallway ?
( it has been awhile so that may not be correct)
Well, in any case, has MR clarified the issue, if she was confused or inaccurate?
They may have still rented the property even if it was for sale. Since it's a vacation spot you could rent it by the week. It beats letting it sit empty and not making any money from it. The one for sale is on Safley and there was one that sold on Safley recently also. The for sale sign by Marks house points in the direction down that road. So, if he ran out of gas down that street he could have walked out right there by MR's property.
Yup it then went to had not taken one, even LE stated that they both had.
Yes so did I, and I knew it was probably not going to turn out well, as on the Monday afternoon LE was already stating they had not ruled out foul play. I as well wondered if she had been mistaken for her sister, as the two looked so much alike.
In this case, I could see the possibility of meeting someone new, as he had just moved, and there are some active groups in the area. This is the scenerio I am hoping for as it means he is probably alive.
ETA I cannot forget "Pat" scenerio. That is a scenerio I as well could see.
I have never heard him say he passed?
But if he did run out of gas, it is hard to see how he managed to kidnap a teen without a running vehicle.
But if he did run out of gas, it is hard to see how he managed to kidnap a teen without a running vehicle.
Looking for footprints is not the same as finding them.
I would probably still be looking for them, even though in vain.