I wonder if a cadaver hit in a vehicle would even mean much as far as evidence goes, as it does not seem to have helped move the case of Lisa Irwin along at all. And this LE would probably not announce it, even if it happened.
do we know if the 9:37 text was sent from the phone or the ipod?
I know LE has told us they found his ipod email account.
They should. I doubt there are many towers in that area. Someone probably knows more about that. I came in late on the thread so it may have been researched already.
LE statement that something either happened at the house or after he left the house makes me think he at least made it there.
Okey doke. I have long figured on an argument between Mr and Dylan. Not a fan of the premeditated theory, although i'm not ruling it out, but I see much more a quick and violent confrontation that got our of hand. Probably at home. Figure MR had enough of the texting on the way home and confiscated the phone. Maybe Dylan was texting from the ipod later (9:37?) although once again, I'm open to other possibilities. Choking/smothering (leaving very little evidence, particulary 10 days later) and then a real quick, panicked, ohmigod whatdoido reaction. Packs up Dylan and the backpack (which has not been opened) and dispatches him quickly. Maybe the lake? Maybe a long drive on a path well known to a place well known to him. If the lake, then probably so he can "hold on" to Dylan in a place he sees every damned day. the lake is problematic because I cannot visualize how you would toss a 100 lb body over that walkway near the dam. And no, i don't think MR has a boat or would have risked using one to dispose of Dylan. I lean a bit more to a pipeline project/open construction zone place. But part of me has always believed this is the simplest of crimes and the simplest of scenes. Quick, violent argument followed by a dump in the lake. Hope I'm wrong.
BBM - (Simply conjecture on my part.) I agree that the 9:37 text is a big clue. In fact I would go so far as to say that it is the sole reason the LE put out the timeline. To say...we have the forensics back...we know... to make the perp nervous. One thing that makes it significant IMO is ER's statements that texts stopped around 8 PM. It seems plausible that she checked her phone records and texts did stop at exactly that time on Dylan's phone. Hence, the replies came from another device. I have multiple theories. But none of them fit with Dylan making it to MR's and LE made it pretty clear that he did. JMO.
Lots of cases, solved and unsolved, didn't produce forensic evidence at the likely scene of the crime. Lacy Peterson, Susan Powell, Michelle Parker to name a few. A quick wrapping of a body and a bloodless death likely prevents this evidence from being found IMO.
We can't expect forensic evidence at every crime scene. Especially when there are 10 days before the CSI even show up.
MOO
I'm not familiar with the Lisa Irwin case. Yes, I've heard of it, but I haven't followed. So, cadaver dogs picked up on a scent in their vehicle, but nothing came of it?
No, we don't know, but many have said since ER had the records and nothing was on there after 8:01, it must have been from an iTouch. MOO
Right. So if he made it there then a scent would be found, right?
But from what I've read, the decomp smell happens pretty quickly. So either MR carried him the what, 4 miles right, to the lake or he put him in the truck. Either way, a decomp smell would have been detected? If dogs can get a decomp scent from under water, surely they can get it from a house, car?
Can you elaborate? Did MR go to Starbucks for their free wi/fi to send a text from the iTouch?
That's true, so the lack of evidence could mean anything?
Again, I'm not being snarky. So many people have said it all points to MR. I'm trying to make it all point to MR and so far it doesn't.
A properly trained and proficient HRD dog can assist law enforcement by locating, often within mere inches, the precise location of your crime scene. Exceptions are few, and include death by asphyxiation if the body is removed from the area immediately.
http://www.caninesearchsolutions.org/uses.html
BBM
In Baby Lisa's case, there allegedly a hit in the mother's bedroom.
So if Dylan was strangled, there would be no scent? The body would have to be transferred, right? When would the decomp scent come into play? If he was transported by vehicle, there would be a scent unless it was a short transport, maybe, in which case I'd think he'd be found already.
A properly trained and proficient HRD dog can assist law enforcement by locating, often within mere inches, the precise location of your crime scene. Exceptions are few, and include death by asphyxiation if the body is removed from the area immediately.
http://www.caninesearchsolutions.org/uses.html
BBM
What was the reasoning on the scent and why no arrest was made?
Scent alone is not enough for an arrest, IMO. We have no idea if the dogs got any scent in MR's home or vehicle. LE is pretty tight lipped here. Far as i know, the K-9 team there now is not searching MR's home or vehicles.
What was the reasoning on the scent and why no arrest was made?
We have no idea if HRD dogs were even at the home do we?
So if Dylan was strangled, there would be no scent? The body would have to be transferred, right? When would the decomp scent come into play? If he was transported by vehicle, there would be a scent unless it was a short transport, maybe, in which case I'd think he'd be found already.
What was the reasoning on the scent and why no arrest was made?
So a non-descript decomp scent, one that was released puclicly. In Dylan's case, if there was a decomp scent from the vehicles or the home, would we have heard of it? At what point in baby Lisa's case was that made public?
So a non-descript decomp scent, one that was released puclicly. In Dylan's case, if there was a decomp scent from the vehicles or the home, would we have heard of it? At what point in baby Lisa's case was that made public?
I would have a really hard time believing that when the FBI and CBI did their extensive search of the home that they didn't bring in dogs.
It seems like it would be standard to do that.
LE said they weren't going to release any information and they have stuck to that with the exception of the 9:37 electronic communication, text or whatever and the hispanic male.
I've seen photos and video of the day they were there. Don't recall seeing any dogs but I could be wrong. Wouldn't that have to be requested on the warrant? At the time I don't think they were considering a possible death in the home were they?
MOO