These are all theories that have been discussed by some and dismissed by others many times over the past months. None of them are outrageously unbelievable or so 'way out there' as to be ridiculous IMO. They are theories, and opinions, which again ... are all we have in the absence of any other facts.
I don't believe anyone has ever implied he just took off for a hike. He could have taken his seemingly lightly packed backpack with him as he was planning to spend a night or perhaps more at his friends place.
I'm not sure where the notion comes from that predators will only ever be lurking in some pre-determined or predictable locations. If that is the case how do they not all end up being caught and whisked off our streets?
Coincidences happen all the time - it's only in retrospect that we recognise or label them as coincidences. One could surmise that a court ordered visit > Dylan by some accounts not keen to go > frowny face on text to mum > disappearing and/or being killed by father within 24 hours of arriving is also an absolutely awful and coincidental sequence of events - yet there seems to be no issue with believing it is at all possible.
Below is an unsolved case of a missing teen that happened when I was a child. It happened outside a rural town, on a track through a sugar cane farm, with her brothers following close behind and no other witnesses -
Courier Mail, July 16 2011
I just needed to point out that this stuff just happens! I'm sure any of us really thought about it we could all think of more cases like this. Even if stats show it isn't very common, that's no reason to dismiss a stranger abduction as almost impossible in any given case.
:moo: