- Joined
- Feb 9, 2010
- Messages
- 41,198
- Reaction score
- 288,377
If MR is guilty, I do not think it was premeditated. He would have had plenty of time, anything up to about 18 hours to create alibis and cover up evidence before he contacted Elaine.
If MR is guilty, I do not think it was premeditated. He would have had plenty of time, anything up to about 18 hours to create alibis and cover up evidence before he contacted Elaine.
Unless...he planned to contact her come evening. Unless he knew she would come immediately. Unless he had a plan to take his whole family with him. I know, that would be incredibly cold blooded in most people's thinking. In the eyes of a narcissist (MOO) it would be logical. His property. I am not saying this is what happened, but I do not consider it out of the realm of possibility.
Unless...he planned to contact her come evening. Unless he knew she would come immediately. Unless he had a plan to take his whole family with him. I know, that would be incredibly cold blooded in most people's thinking. In the eyes of a narcissist (MOO) it would be logical. His property. I am not saying this is what happened, but I do not consider it out of the realm of possibility.
Also I think an unpremeditated act of rage is an act of desperation, and often it seems that men who kill their family in an act of desperation end up killing themselves too. It's kind of a falling-over-the-edge moment. IMO.
I think premeditated murderers of family are less likely to kill themselves but that's totally an opinion and not intended to be an assertion of a fact.
The Family Annihilator - Fathers Who Kill
Men, on the other hand, feel rage, jealousy, hatred, and revenge when they kill their families.
http://voices.yahoo.com/the-family-annihilator-fathers-kill-375532.html?cat=72
Thank you for the article. Scary read! I wish the author had talked about the difference between a man who kills himself in this annihilation process and one who does not. I'm sure there are many who do not, just curious what the difference is and if it is an observable difference.
The previous articles linked are discussing familial homicide. I'm not seeing where this has anything to do with this case. Interesting reads though.
This would be considered a familial homicide if Mark killed his son.
A spur of the moment , anger fueled incident sounds great in theory ! But those are the kinds of scenes that usually leave a wealth of physical evidence and there is none ! Or at least none that we are aware of . Right? The only way I can see MR doing something and leaving no trace would be careful , premeditated , well thought out with all his bases covered and I don't know if I can buy that he did that. I can totally see him flying into a rage , however, but leaving so neat and spotless a house/truck and any other potential crime scene doesn't seem to fit with the rage theory. Thoughts?
Either way I certainly don't want to get into a debate about it. I just wanted to stop by
and say COME HOME YOUNG MAN !
A spur of the moment , anger fueled incident sounds great in theory ! But those are the kinds of scenes that usually leave a wealth of physical evidence and there is none ! Or at least none that we are aware of . Right? The only way I can see MR doing something and leaving no trace would be careful , premeditated , well thought out with all his bases covered and I don't know if I can buy that he did that. I can totally see him flying into a rage , however, but leaving so neat and spotless a house/truck and any other potential crime scene doesn't seem to fit with the rage theory. Thoughts?
Either way I certainly don't want to get into a debate about it. I just wanted to stop by
and say COME HOME YOUNG MAN !
It would depend upon what happened, if true. Not all crimes/deaths leave blood evidence.
True, but violent fits of rage usually do.