CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #51

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,041
Making sure he has his story right?

Actually I think he is someone who works things out in his head. Some people work things out by talking. Just a simple personality difference. IMO.
 
  • #1,042
Making sure he has his story right?

That's a good question. But what does it mean? Keeping his story right because he wants the truth and only the truth to be known? That sounds reasonable to me.
 
  • #1,043
Why would anyone have to rehearse the truth? A lie yes, the truth no IMO.
 
  • #1,044
That's a good question. But what does it mean? Keeping his story right because he wants the truth and only the truth to be known? That sounds reasonable to me.

No. Why do you think LE wants to interview the last person to see a victim ASAP? So they don't have time to construct some made-up story.
 
  • #1,045
Why would anyone have to rehearse the truth? A lie yes, the truth no IMO.

Yeah, I don't know why the "innocent" father of a missing child would have to rehearse his story. Making sure that he says the same information that he has already said in past interviews? Make sure that the timeline he gives makes it impossible/difficult for him to have killed Dylan?
 
  • #1,046
Why would anyone have to rehearse the truth? A lie yes, the truth no IMO.

Mark doesn't personally know Tricia and after the Dr Phil debacle he's probably a little gun shy about being question by people he doesn't know. I imagine he was worried about being ambushed. And he prepared himself for that. That's totally understandable to me.
 
  • #1,047
Which leaves "stranger danger". He was a small looking, blonde looking, likely troubled 13 year old. How closely have they checked the registered sex offenders, I wonder?

LE claims the closest SOs were cleared.
But the case in Iowa - if that perv actually was also responsible for E and L's deaths, that was like 30 miles away, wasn't it?

I wonder how wide of a radius of RSOs they checked and how many?
 
  • #1,048
Mark doesn't personally know Tricia and after the Dr Phil debacle he's probably a little gun shy about being question by people he doesn't know. I imagine he was worried about being ambushed. And he prepared himself for that. That's totally understandable to me.

I was impressed with the way he handled not taking the caller's question and also declining to speak about the Dr Phil show. I thought he did that with some grace, did not get angry or defensive, or seem irritated, confused or concerned.
 
  • #1,049
Why would anyone have to rehearse the truth? A lie yes, the truth no IMO.

Most people rehearse to improve their communication/presentation skills. Has nothing to do with truth/lie.
 
  • #1,050
AlwaysShocked said that they were new to the case. Thus they are not aware of the inconsistencies in MR's past version of the stories. Nor are they aware of the reasons that ER might be a tad bitter at this time. I will be curious to see if they have the same comments after they read more about the events surrounding this case. JMO
 
  • #1,051
No. Why do you think LE wants to interview the last person to see a victim ASAP? So they don't have time to construct some made-up story.

Are we talking about how Mark did during his initial police interview or how he did a week ago during Tricia's interview? That's two didn't things.
 
  • #1,052
LE claims the closest SOs were cleared.
But the case in Iowa - if that perv actually was also responsible for E and L's deaths, that was like 30 miles away, wasn't it?

I wonder how wide of a radius of RSOs they checked and how many?

RSOs may have been cleared but not the SOs. Or, those that may have been visiting from other areas. Is Deputy Sutter considered a RSO now? He would not have been on the LE SO/RSO radar at the time of Dylan's disappearance.
 
  • #1,053
AlwaysShocked said that they were new to the case. Thus they are not aware of the inconsistencies in MR's past version of the stories. Nor are they aware of the reasons that ER might be a tad bitter at this time. I will be curious to see if they have the same comments after they read more about the events surrounding this case. JMO

I personally think that anyone who sticks with the "facts" and doesn't consider all the personal opinions of others will come to the same conclusion as AlwaysShocked.
 
  • #1,054
I personally think that anyone who sticks with the "facts" and doesn't consider all the personal opinions of others will come to the same conclusion as AlwaysShocked.

Inconsistencies in the way one lays out the 'facts' of a story can be very problematic. MR has gotten his messed up a few times, imo.
 
  • #1,055
LE claims the closest SOs were cleared.
But the case in Iowa - if that perv actually was also responsible for E and L's deaths, that was like 30 miles away, wasn't it?

I wonder how wide of a radius of RSOs they checked and how many?

I wonder too about transient or touristy RSO's....how would they even go about identifying someone like that?
 
  • #1,056
Inconsistencies in the way one lays out the 'facts' of a story can be very problematic. MR has gotten his messed up a few times, imo.

I think we all probably agree that MR is not a professional speaker. He has improved out of necessity to get his thoughts across. He did seem to "ramble on" when he first came to our attention. But, I recall that Mark Lunsford did also.
 
  • #1,057
Inconsistencies in the way one lays out the 'facts' of a story can be very problematic. MR has gotten his messed up a few times, imo.

What facts has Mark gotten wrong? Or are you saying that the facts must be put in there proper order?

Lets say that Mark or a reporter got the order of when Mark spoke to Dylan's friends wrong, would that inconsistency be a factor in determining that Mark is lying? Or is it an honest error?
 
  • #1,058
I think there was a camp counselor or youth director from Durango who was arrested early this year too....I'll try to find that article. Did EH or MR have a church affiliation in the greater vallecito area?
 
  • #1,059
This poster has admitted to not being familiar with this case and only basing opinion on a single radio interview done 6 !/2 months after the disappearance of Dylan (November 19, 2012). I would suggest that opinion doesn't bear a lot of credence at this time. After the poster catches up and reviews all the interviews, msm articles and videos, official LE releases, over 51 WS threads,etc. , even the official facebook page I would venture to guess an opinion change. JMO
I will agree with the post that Tricia was an incredible host and unbiased moderator on the Sunday show (June 2, 2013).
Well, you could be right but I'll let AlwaysShocked make that decision. I don't think that AS needs to go thru all 51 threads to come to a good understanding of this case. There's not that many facts to look at so it shouldn't take a long time to decide. MOO.
 
  • #1,060
http://durangoherald.com/article/20.../Camp-counselor-faces-child-sex-crime-charges

former staff member with First United Methodist Church in Durango has been arrested on suspicion of attempting to lure a child through the Internet.

Ian Robert Walker, 24, of Alamosa, was arrested Wednesday on the campus of Adams State College in Alamosa. He was booked into the Alamosa County Jail on suspicion of Internet luring of a child and sexual exploitation of a child. He since has posted bail.

The La Plata County Sheriff’s Office, which assisted with the investigation, is seeking possible victims of Internet crimes against children in this region.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
104
Guests online
1,292
Total visitors
1,396

Forum statistics

Threads
632,360
Messages
18,625,291
Members
243,111
Latest member
ParalegalEagle13
Back
Top