CO - Gannon Stauch, 11, found deceased, Colorado Springs, El Paso County, 27 Jan 2020 *Arrest* #68

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #521
omg. I just read about a case of a Steven Michael Stagner who thought he was the Archangel Michael. Colorado spree killing: he was found NGRI after using a rifle to murder 4 and injure 3 Hispanic people in 2001. Schizophrenic, later updated to schizoaffective disorder at CMHIP where he has been housed ever since. 2015 article:


LS has told so many lies, I cannot even remember which interview it was that she mentioned the Archangel Michael handing out business cards! I know she said it in reference to deciding to go hiking at GoG. Anyone?
 
  • #522
Judge Werner talks with the jurors prior to going to the deliberation room:

4:25:10 right ladies and gentlemen as I indicated earlier when I read the instructions to you there are four
verdict forms uh one for murder in the first degree after deliberation one for
murder in the first degree child Under 12 by a person in a position of trust one for charge of tampering with a
deceased human body and one for tampering with physical evidence
in a moment I'm going to send almost all of you back to the deliberation room and members of the jury I want to thank you
for listening so closely to the evidence in this case um because
most or all of you have not served as jurors before I would like to give you a
few pointers regarding the process of deliberation however unlike the instructions that I gave you these are
only suggestions and you are free to proceed in any way you wish first You may wish to choose your four
person who will preside over your deliberations you may already have a good idea of someone that you think
would be fair a good listener and a good discussion manager pick someone who is willing and able to
help the discussion remain organized and respectful remember however that the four persons
opinion has no greater value than that of any other juror second you should reach some agreements
about how you will conduct yourselves the four person shall enforce or encourage compliance with these
agreements if he or she is unable to do so or engages in this conduct him or
herself the jurors have the right to select a new presiding juror
jurors are often tempted to hold a preliminary or straw vote at the
beginning of deliberations in order to determine whether they already agree or how divided the group may be
I recommend against this procedure because it may cause some jurors to lock themselves into a position which they
will then feel reluctant to change experience has also shown that such early votes frequently lead to
disruptive unnecessarily lengthy and inefficient debate and to ineffective
decision making if you reach a particularly controversial or difficult point in the
discussion you may want to move to a less controversial or simpler area for discussion and return later to the more
difficult issue You may wish to consider secret ballots if the jury would feel more comfortable
with this procedure you each have the right to your
individual opinion but you should be open to persuasion
it helps if you are open to the possibility that you might be wrong or at least that you might change your mind
about some issues after listening to other views misunderstanding can undermine your
efforts seek clarification if you do not understand or if you think others are not talking about the same thing
the four person or some other juror is agreed to by the jury may wish to take notes of agreements and disagreements
and from time to time set out the items on which you agree in those on which you have not yet reached
agreement you must deliberate as a group while you are all together
in spite of your best efforts it is indeed possible that serious
disagreements may arise in that event recognize and accept
that getting stuck is often part of the decision-making process
it is easy to fall into the Trap of believing that there is something wrong with someone who is not ready to move toward what may be an emerging decision
such a belief however is not helpful it can lead to a conflict of personalities rather than a conflict of issues
it is best to be patient with one another taking a break can often be helpful and lead to a satisfactory
conclusion the bailiff is available whenever you need to stretch to calm down to clear your minds take a walk
around the building something of that nature as I indicated however these are only suggestions
and you are free to proceed in any way you wish when we began this process I told you
that we were going to be selecting 12 jurors plus six alternates the reason why we do that is because in
any case that lasts for longer than a day if something were to happen to a
juror during the process we would have I would have to declare a mistrial start all over on another date
at another time from the beginning with a whole new different crew
um this was the first trial of any length that we've had since covid
um I have had long trials before um and I I understand that uh things
happen uh during trial sometimes people have family emergencies during trial sometimes people get sick sometimes as
in this case we had a juror who didn't know that they knew a witness until that witness got here
um so we always try to plan for that because we don't want to have to put everybody
through another trial at a different time and start all over without any
potential of resolution and without any potential of getting through all of the evidence however the law only permits 12 people
to deliberate in this case uh the alternates in this case are chosen at
random I'm still going to refer to you as number to protect your privacy so we
have nine people in the back number 10 number 11 number 12.
you're 13 14 15 16 17 13 through 17 will
not be deliberating I'm going to excuse jurors one through twelve
um and Mr Combs will take you back to the deliberation room um and there should be do we have food
there should be food or food is on the way we are uh working on that so please be patient with us uh but we're going to
send 12 of you back now the other five please remain in the courtroom because I have further instructions for you I’ll
rise for uh the 12 jurors please
thank you may all be seated records did reflect that the 12 jurors
have left the courtroom um we get to this point in every case almost any case it lasts
longer than a day and I always feel terrible for the people that are the alternates because
you have put in just as much time effort and energy as everyone else you have
dedicated a lot of time to this case over the last
seven weeks eight weeks wherever we are um but you don't get to deliberate
yet which is why um it is possible and we just had it
happen last week in a different case where one of the jurors had to be replaced by an alternate
um so this is going to sound a little strange I'm going to release you but uh
you're not excused from jury service what that means is that you're not going to be deliberating back with a 12 but
you still cannot discuss this case among yourselves cannot discuss the case with anyone else cannot do your own
independent research about any aspect of the case the reason for that is it is possible that I would still need your
services if something were to happen to one of the jurors that is deliberating
um what I'm going to do is I'm going to have uh Mr Sproul take you back to an
um an alternate alternate Jury Room uh because you guys have two of them back there but I want to have a conversation
with you about um some security things and some uh publicity things and also some services
that we offer so I want to have that conversation with you um uh before we discuss anything further
um and you're welcome to stay in that jury room for the rest of the day you're down here I don't know what you want to
do we can talk about that but we'll talk about all that back there I do have certificates of service for you and I
also have a questionnaire which I'm going to ask you to fill out it's something that the state of Colorado
sends out to jurors so if you would take the time to fill it out and I'll be back
to talk with you in about 10 minutes or so I'd greatly appreciate it all rise
for the jurors please
4:34:34 I think you may all be seated records should reflect the jury has left the courtroom
 
  • #523
Just curious, which non-cluster B PD do you suspect she could have?

IMO, she possibly has some traits of OCPD.

Schizotypal PD (from Cluster A) and inside Cluster B, Histrionic). And yes, possibly OCPD as well. I'd expect her to have partial traits of non-Cluster B personality, but I add in Histrionic due to her constant use of vague language, the possibility of her exaggerating her own symptoms and those others (for attention).

From the Schizotypal cluster (which may be a stretch and she may actually be pretending this one):

Overall diagnosis of Schizotypal involves

1. A persistent pattern of intense discomfort with and decreased capacity for close relationships

2. Cognitive or perceptual distortions and eccentricities of behavior

And the symptoms are:



  • Ideas of reference (notions that everyday occurrences have special meaning or significance personally intended for or directed to themselves) but not delusions of reference (which are similar but held with greater conviction)
  • Odd beliefs or magical thinking (eg, believing in clairvoyance, telepathy, or a sixth sense; being preoccupied with paranormal phenomena)
  • Unusual perceptional experiences (eg, hearing a voice whispering their name)
  • Odd thought and speech (eg, that is vague, metaphorical, excessively elaborate, or stereotyped)
  • Suspicions or paranoid thoughts
  • Incongruous or limited affect
  • Odd, eccentric, or peculiar behavior and/or appearance
  • Lack of close friends or confidants, except for 1st-degree relatives
  • Excessive social anxiety that does not lessen with familiarity and is related mainly to paranoid fears

Also, symptoms must have begun by early adulthood.
=====================

Obviously, I"m just spitballing here and speculating. But it did occur to me that there's little to no evidence that T. has been able to maintain longterm, stable relationships with almost anyone. She may be incapable of feeling emotionally close to anyone (what most of us would call "love" or at least "bonding"). Her consistently inappropriate affect on all those phone calls with AS (when Gannon is missing and she KNOWS he is dead), well, I just can't get that one out of my mind. And it's consistent in her talk with Grusing, as well.

It's almost as if she doesn't have the ability to even know how to fake being scared, worried and terrified at what has happened to Gannon.

The Narcissistic part seems obvious, but her rambling references to Archangel Michael and to resurrection via burial in grandparents' back yard are weird (eccentric). But a lot of what she says is weird (tells Al she's more educated than the principal at her school; pretends to have gone to some law school - it's narcissistic, of course, BUT, she does so much of this that an ordinary person would not believe her and would just think she was super weird).

The hair fort thing is on my mind, too. She's manipulative to AS, yes, but in a very offbeat, strange manner (making Al post that he loves her on her Instagram before she will reveal certain info to him - I think it might have been about the missing money). It's that her attempts to manipulative have a bizarre or eccentric quality to them (just as we hear in her own recording of what she tells Gannon about the carpet burn, it's just "off" to me).

All MOO.

 
  • #524
Hi @UnapologeticallyAspie, I've heard same that a short deliberation results in a positive outcome. However, regarding this case jurors were sent to deliberate just after 1:00 pm MT last Friday. So that is under 4 hours and not considered long. I hope for guilty verdict by 1:00 pm MT on Monday!

Additionally, this being a more complex crime with a lot of factors I'd expect that it will take time to sort it out. IMO

Justice for Gannon!
I keep having to remind myself that it only *seems* long because we’ve had to wait over the weekend
All MOO. I am very dependent on visuals in my learning process and memorization. This chart helps me when talking about clusters and which ones Letecia seems to exhibit.

The Prosecution's Psychologists seem to pin point Letecia as having Borderline with Narcissistic features, but it seems like so much more. Whatever it is, I agree, it's woven deep within her personality. JMO though.
View attachment 420325
View attachment 420323
I definitely see her having traits of ASPD in addition to NPD and BPD. IMO, but I would think ASPD is harder to diagnose or pin down from just a one-time visit. I’m not a doctor though, just someone with an intense personal interest in psychology.

I have met one person who qualifies for all 3 “dark triad” points. (Dated him, actually, years ago - absolute nightmare) His narcissistic/machevellian behaviors didn’t take that long to spot. But it took me a long time before I realized that he was likely a psychopath, too. He eventually admitted to me that he does not feel empathy or guilt. Like, not even a little bit.

IMO, I think we go into interactions with others with a basic assumption that they have morals and feel empathy for others. Even narcissists, as unempathetic as they can be, usually still believe in some variation of a moral code. They often break their own code and justify their actions to avoid feeling shame, but they will still usually try to avoid the feeling of having done something “wrong.” I’ve known a few people very high in narcissistic traits, and ironically, they are actually quite insecure and overreliant on what others think of them for their own self-esteem.

Psychopaths, on the other hand, don’t feel the need to justify their actions, even to themselves. They might justify their actions to someone else if it benefits them, but it’s an act. They know what morals are and understand them, but they don’t care about following them. They can go through the same motions that anyone could go through when admitting responsibility or apologizing, but feel nothing. That to me is terrifying

(MOO)
 
  • #525
Noone mentioned it, but I believe she is Histrionic imo. The fake twins, the burglaries. Even all the stories she made up about Gannon.

She is very dramatic. She really is a true blue Cluster b IMOO.

Totally agree. I got to study Histrionic PD up close a few times. Some psychiatric researchers are wanting to collapse Histrionic and Antisocial together (the first is mostly women, the second is mostly men; the story-telling and lying are consistent across both). One distinction that I've read that psychiatrists will use is that Antisocials do bad things for personal gain; Histrionics do bad things whether or not they gain - and whether or not the attention they get is positive. Narcissists get enraged if they receive criticism/attention for their alleged flaws.

Histrionics do not really care whether the attention is positive or negative. The fake pregnancies, the fake twins, the fake bio son, the burglaries (and of course the invention of the Cast for her Alibi Drama - Eguardo, Quincy, etc). Histrionics do this so routinely that most people who know them well just ignore it; it's too drama-inducing to challenge them. And they do take on personae (all the time; they like to imitate others; they may have a few dramatic personae - for example, of the women I studied was a clown, as a sort of profession - she had 4-5 clown personae, with different wigs and voices for each; she performed at various venues (for free, long story). She also had a couple of other non-clown related personae. She could produce them on demand (and would produce them at social events where others literally just watched her perform - at office parties or family gatherings or church, whether or not it was expected that she perform and certain as the only performer in the room). Long, involved stories with lots of "color" and very little verifiable details.

That's the kind of thing I thought when I saw T. in the room with Dr L. T. produces this slightly different (performative) other personae and Dr L gets all excited and rewards her for it (job done, thinks Dr. L!) But all I see is Histrionic In Action (with its strong overlap with Antisocial)

ALL my opinion on this bright Sunday morning, with Justice coming for Gannon - TOMORROW is my hope.

TL;DR - T. has some Histrionic traits too. Big surprise.
 
  • #526
omg. I just read about a case of a Steven Michael Stagner who thought he was the Archangel Michael. Colorado spree killing: he was found NGRI after using a rifle to murder 4 and injure 3 Hispanic people in 2001. Schizophrenic, later updated to schizoaffective disorder at CMHIP where he has been housed ever since. 2015 article:


LS has told so many lies, I cannot even remember which interview it was that she mentioned the Archangel Michael handing out business cards! I know she said it in reference to deciding to go hiking at GoG. Anyone?
I haven’t found the beginning of her bringing up Michael the Archangel, but I found this. At 1:29

She says the stuff with the Archangel had already happened….

It was in one of her recorded interviews at the State Hospital with Dr Torres and Dr Gray in the room with her.

This is from April 28 with Dr Torres on the stand for a second day.

 
  • #527
Schizotypal PD (from Cluster A) and inside Cluster B, Histrionic). And yes, possibly OCPD as well. I'd expect her to have partial traits of non-Cluster B personality, but I add in Histrionic due to her constant use of vague language, the possibility of her exaggerating her own symptoms and those others (for attention).

From the Schizotypal cluster (which may be a stretch and she may actually be pretending this one):

Overall diagnosis of Schizotypal involves

1. A persistent pattern of intense discomfort with and decreased capacity for close relationships

2. Cognitive or perceptual distortions and eccentricities of behavior

And the symptoms are:



  • Ideas of reference (notions that everyday occurrences have special meaning or significance personally intended for or directed to themselves) but not delusions of reference (which are similar but held with greater conviction)
  • Odd beliefs or magical thinking (eg, believing in clairvoyance, telepathy, or a sixth sense; being preoccupied with paranormal phenomena)
  • Unusual perceptional experiences (eg, hearing a voice whispering their name)
  • Odd thought and speech (eg, that is vague, metaphorical, excessively elaborate, or stereotyped)
  • Suspicions or paranoid thoughts
  • Incongruous or limited affect
  • Odd, eccentric, or peculiar behavior and/or appearance
  • Lack of close friends or confidants, except for 1st-degree relatives
  • Excessive social anxiety that does not lessen with familiarity and is related mainly to paranoid fears

Also, symptoms must have begun by early adulthood.
=====================

Obviously, I"m just spitballing here and speculating. But it did occur to me that there's little to no evidence that T. has been able to maintain longterm, stable relationships with almost anyone. She may be incapable of feeling emotionally close to anyone (what most of us would call "love" or at least "bonding"). Her consistently inappropriate affect on all those phone calls with AS (when Gannon is missing and she KNOWS he is dead), well, I just can't get that one out of my mind. And it's consistent in her talk with Grusing, as well.

It's almost as if she doesn't have the ability to even know how to fake being scared, worried and terrified at what has happened to Gannon.

The Narcissistic part seems obvious, but her rambling references to Archangel Michael and to resurrection via burial in grandparents' back yard are weird (eccentric). But a lot of what she says is weird (tells Al she's more educated than the principal at her school; pretends to have gone to some law school - it's narcissistic, of course, BUT, she does so much of this that an ordinary person would not believe her and would just think she was super weird).

The hair fort thing is on my mind, too. She's manipulative to AS, yes, but in a very offbeat, strange manner (making Al post that he loves her on her Instagram before she will reveal certain info to him - I think it might have been about the missing money). It's that her attempts to manipulative have a bizarre or eccentric quality to them (just as we hear in her own recording of what she tells Gannon about the carpet burn, it's just "off" to me).

All MOO.

Interesting – actually that makes me think of my roommate and what he’s told me about his childhood experience with his biological mom. She was abusive, physically and emotionally, but beyond being abusive, she acted bizarrely and was paranoid about everything, well beyond the point of typical bpd paranoia. I thought cluster B/A comorbidity when he described her to me. Said she used to threaten to kick him out, and then immediately beg him not to leave.

My roommate has told me that his mom, on one occasion, made him go to the emergency room and pretend to have food poisoning to use as an excuse to not have to see his dad, who she thought was stalking them. (Actually instructed him to lie to the hospital staff) She apparently also for a time used to make him and his sister duck and whisper to speak while in the house, because she thought his dad had wired the house with cameras. Just very odd behavior

But apparently she was also very extroverted and charming. He said all his friends as a kid loved her and thought she was fun and cool, and she had an active social and romantic life. (Dysfunctional, but active.) The last he heard of her was that she had a psychotic break and was refusing help from family.

Just wanted to share that because I personally feel like I could draw some comparisons to Letecia’s behavior. All just my opinion; obviously we’re all just armchair diagnosing over here :P but it’s still interesting to try to analyze her because I’ve just honestly never seen anything quite like her behavior before.
 
  • #528
Stepping back to a simpler question, do we know if Letecia was medicated during the trial?

I ask because I didn’t really see any indication that she was particularly anxious or even nervous. She’s supposed to have GAD but for that matter I never saw it during the trial, during interviews with the FBI agents, during her evaluations by the psychologists.

Am I missing something?
 
  • #529
Totally agree. I got to study Histrionic PD up close a few times. Some psychiatric researchers are wanting to collapse Histrionic and Antisocial together (the first is mostly women, the second is mostly men; the story-telling and lying are consistent across both). One distinction that I've read that psychiatrists will use is that Antisocials do bad things for personal gain; Histrionics do bad things whether or not they gain - and whether or not the attention they get is positive. Narcissists get enraged if they receive criticism/attention for their alleged flaws.

Histrionics do not really care whether the attention is positive or negative. The fake pregnancies, the fake twins, the fake bio son, the burglaries (and of course the invention of the Cast for her Alibi Drama - Eguardo, Quincy, etc). Histrionics do this so routinely that most people who know them well just ignore it; it's too drama-inducing to challenge them. And they do take on personae (all the time; they like to imitate others; they may have a few dramatic personae - for example, of the women I studied was a clown, as a sort of profession - she had 4-5 clown personae, with different wigs and voices for each; she performed at various venues (for free, long story). She also had a couple of other non-clown related personae. She could produce them on demand (and would produce them at social events where others literally just watched her perform - at office parties or family gatherings or church, whether or not it was expected that she perform and certain as the only performer in the room). Long, involved stories with lots of "color" and very little verifiable details.

That's the kind of thing I thought when I saw T. in the room with Dr L. T. produces this slightly different (performative) other personae and Dr L gets all excited and rewards her for it (job done, thinks Dr. L!) But all I see is Histrionic In Action (with its strong overlap with Antisocial)

ALL my opinion on this bright Sunday morning, with Justice coming for Gannon - TOMORROW is my hope.

TL;DR - T. has some Histrionic traits too. Big surprise.
I have never met anyone diagnosed with it AFAIK, but my own father is most definitely a narcissist with histrionic traits. He’s a pathological liar, and half the time, the lies he tells don’t even make him look good or benefit him in any way.

For example, recently, at a family dinner in front of my young cousins, he told a story about him and his ex-girlfriend getting into a gunfight with someone. I could see my family members exchange exasperated looks with each other; the story was obviously fake, and they’re so used to it that they don’t react. He does or says things for attention like that in public all the time, and it is SO embarrassing.

On 2 different occasions, I’ve witnessed him call 911 when there was absolutely no emergency. Both times were for traffic violations that didn’t result in an accident; he was just angry. Reminds me of how T instructed Harley to call 911 if she felt uncomfortable.

I could go on and on, but wanted to share my own experience of someone with histrionic traits. I definitely see some of those behaviors in T. Her cover stories aren’t just excuses – they’re full on sagas, complete with all the characters and drama.

(MOO)

Edit: because I apparently don’t know how to properly format/reply to posts
 
Last edited:
  • #530
Stepping back to a simpler question, do we know if Letecia was medicated during the trial?

I ask because I didn’t really see any indication that she was particularly anxious or even nervous. She’s supposed to have GAD but for that matter I never saw it during the trial, during interviews with the FBI agents, during her evaluations by the psychologists.

Am I missing something?

We don't know, but I've been guessing that she is medicated (low dose anti-psychotic OR an anti-anxiety drug like Klonopin would be my bet). That would have been standard "stabilizing" procedure that resulted in her being found competent to stand trial.

The reason I'm guessing this, aside from her very constricted behavior (for her), is the weight gain. It's just a characteristic type of "puffy" weight gain that I associate with side effects of, say, Klonopin. But Thorazine does cause weight gain as well.

She's just too chill (although her hair mannerisms remain). It would also explain her head-on-the-table behavior.

I bet whoever is treating her might also be thinking that long-acting injectables are the way to go, if they're using one of the anti-psychotics.

Wasn't she in the psych ward for evaluation for more than a month?


JMO.
 
  • #531
The proposed combination of HPD and ASPD seems

I have never met anyone diagnosed with it AFAIK, but my own father is most definitely a narcissist with histrionic traits. He’s a pathological liar, and half the time, the lies he tells don’t even make him look good or benefit him in any way.

For example, recently, at a family dinner in front of my young cousins, he told a story about him and his ex-girlfriend getting into a gunfight with someone. I could see my family members exchange exasperated looks with each other; the story was obviously fake, and they’re so used to it that they don’t react. He does or says things for attention like that in public all the time, and it is SO embarrassing.

On 2 different occasions, I’ve witnessed him call 911 when there was absolutely no emergency. Both times were for traffic violations that didn’t result in an accident; he was just angry. Reminds me of how T instructed Harley to call 911 if she felt uncomfortable.

I could go on and on, but wanted to share my own experience of someone with histrionic traits. I definitely see some of those behaviors in T. Her cover stories aren’t just excuses – they’re full on sagas, complete with all the characters and drama.

(MOO)

Exactly. The person I was talking about also had a gun battle story. And two kidnapping stories, etc., etc. The ease and speed with which they can invent and embellish these stories is simply amazing. AFAIK, they really do believe most of their own stories. I've never seen one take a lie detector test, though.

Again, if this jury thinks THAT is a form of "legally insane," CO is in trouble with their NGRI system, IMO. It's true that T's symptoms have landed her in boiling water AND she's OTT in every way (each noted symptom that we see in those conversations with AS is way off the charts, how he stayed patient and calm with her is amazing). I like how he adopted that motif of "I'm in 'Letecia is telling the truth' mode; don't make me leave that mode" as a way of trying to rein in all the many obvious exaggerations and contradictory stories).

It should be noted that almost no one with a PD is also a child murderer. T's "symptoms" are extreme and all over the place. We have no clue when she actually started harming Gannon (with various kinds of abuse) and when she actually first fantasized about killing him, or what her various plans to kill him might have been.

IMO.
 
  • #532
Stepping back to a simpler question, do we know if Letecia was medicated during the trial?

I ask because I didn’t really see any indication that she was particularly anxious or even nervous. She’s supposed to have GAD but for that matter I never saw it during the trial, during interviews with the FBI agents, during her evaluations by the psychologists.

Am I missing something?
I have GAD, and honestly I do fully believe Letecia genuinely has GAD. Symptoms of GAD aren’t always obvious to others, and it’s one of the most common mental illnesses in the world, so it doesn’t always stand out. But her desire to avoid being in the courtroom, putting in earplugs, and her hiding behind her hair and slouching reads like anxiety symptoms to me.

IMO, her google searches really speak to a likely anxiety disorder. She googles the same thing multiple times in a row and sometimes with different phrasing – I actually have a tendency to do this too, and I believe it’s related to the fact that I ruminate. She also seems to have a lot of the hypervigilance I’d associate with anxiety. (Example: the fact that she obsessively read and memorized Gannon’s autopsy report is quite unusual.)

I also wouldn’t be surprised if she is taking anti-anxiety medication. From what we’ve heard, she was at one point prescribed hydroxyzine. She might still be taking it. It’s not as sedating as benzodiazepines, and may not cause any noticeable behavior change.

(IMO)

Edit: I also would not be shocked if she was on antipsychotics. From my experience in a psych ward, antipsychotics are prescribed liberally for anyone showing possible signs of BPD or even just anxiety. They don’t alter a person’s personality, but they do make you very sleepy and less moody.
 
Last edited:
  • #533
Last edited:
  • #534
EBM to add that this was 2 months before she changed her plea from Not Guilty to NGRI.


Speaking of LS being medicated, remember when she said this to refuse coming to a Review hearing in December 2021?

Ooh I don’t remember that bit about her medication.

I wonder if she is over-exaggerating her own lack of self-control, or if she actually truly has trouble controlling herself without medication. Maybe a bit of both.

(imo)

Edit: typo
 
  • #535
EBM to add that this was 2 months before she changed her plea from Not Guilty to NGRI.


Speaking of LS being medicated, remember when she said this to refuse coming to a Review hearing in December 2021?


Ah ha!

Thank you so much!

I'll assume it's one of the benzos (Klonopin would be my guess) since if it were an anti-psychotic, surely the defense would mention that? Wouldn't they??

IMO.
 
  • #536
  • #537
After LS refused to attend the December 2021 hearing, the Judge issued an Order that very same day that all reasonable force will be used for future appearances.


View attachment 420391View attachment 420392
Replying to myself to say this Order in December 2021 the Judge said he MAY order reasonable force- it was a warning.

September 2022 the warning because a reality after more LS shenanigans.


[…]

Also under discussion in October is a concern prosecutors raised about where Stauch will be housed if an outside psychiatrist does her next evaluation. She had been at the state hospital, but prosecutors told the judge the hospital might refuse to hold her if its staff isn’t doing the evaluation. The El Paso County jail and Parkview Medical Center in Pueblo have been mentioned as housing alternatives.

Stauch arrived at her hearing Thursday nearly an hour late, having reportedly refused to go. Going forward, Warner ruled Thursday that officers can force Stauch to come to court -- even if she refuses.

“We had a conversation a while back about you needing to be here, and what it would look like if you [refuse],” Werner told Stauch at the end of the hearing. He said he has ordered deputies to use “all force reasonably necessary” to make sure Stauch leaves the jail on court days.”

Stauch claimed it was hygiene issues that kept her from court, alleging at one point that inmates weren’t being given toilet paper. She also complained about a lack of air conditioning in the transport van.

But Werner said whatever the reason, she will have to be in the courtroom going forward, whether she wants to or not.

“One thing you do not have a choice about going forward is whether you’re going to appear,” he said.

 
  • #538
Stepping back to a simpler question, do we know if Letecia was medicated during the trial?

I ask because I didn’t really see any indication that she was particularly anxious or even nervous. She’s supposed to have GAD but for that matter I never saw it during the trial, during interviews with the FBI agents, during her evaluations by the psychologists.

Am I missing something?

I have no clue if she is medicated but I would say if you watch her, she is constantly chewing at her nails, twirling her hair, rubbing her fingers round her mouth etc. I think those are signs that she is at least uncomfortable.
My son is autistic with a PDA profile, which is an anxiety based profile, and he does all these things, they are much more prominent the higher his anxiety is, especially the hair twirling.
 
  • #539
Thinking about next Sunday May 14 being Mother’s Day is making me unbelievably sad.


C8EAF1FE-66DD-4CE9-9C98-C1EF874ED038.jpeg
 
  • #540
I definitely see her having traits of ASPD in addition to NPD and BPD. IMO, but I would think ASPD is harder to diagnose or pin down from just a one-time visit.
It just seems one of the best ways to pin down ASPD might be their history, especially regarding rules / law breaking. I don't know for sure, but I connect it more with disregarding and not conforming. I thought that was a key feature of the condition?
IMO, her google searches really speak to a likely anxiety disorder. She googles the same thing multiple times in a row and sometimes with different phrasing...
You're good at pin pointing behavior. Astute. The google searches were excessive and almost silly simple. (As for you and I, we are all forced to run different searches changing wording to get a decent answer. Use the word new and you might get lots of happy new year answers. lol)
One distinction that I've read that psychiatrists will use is that Antisocials do bad things for personal gain; Histrionics do bad things whether or not they gain - and whether or not the attention they get is positive. Narcissists get enraged if they receive criticism/attention for their alleged flaws.
Really surprises me that there's similarities between those two-- ASPD and HPD. Aren't there extreme differences in the two? Please know, I don't understand either fully. (Narcissism I can see as like a side order or comorbidity to any other unless it's full blown NPD.)
We don't know, but I've been guessing that she is medicated (low dose anti-psychotic OR an anti-anxiety drug like Klonopin would be my bet). That would have been standard "stabilizing" procedure that resulted in her being found competent to stand trial.
Could she answer no she was not on any drugs to the Judge when he asked? He did ask just before asking her if she was going to testify on her behalf. I thought she said no, which surprised me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
72
Guests online
3,563
Total visitors
3,635

Forum statistics

Threads
632,608
Messages
18,628,921
Members
243,213
Latest member
bleuuu_
Back
Top