I believe the actual word used by Chief White was "fractured" but this journalist seems to think it means the same as broken, as did I. Whatever the case, I predict that the crime scene footage will never be released, as the stark obscenity inherent in the spectacle of two grown men manhandling the bleeding body of a murdered girl would bring the case to worldwide attention.so
"Journalist seemed to think" fractured was broken, then 'broken' was repeated in other MSM.
I'm not sure what journalist
thought but see what journalist
did -
substituted
different term (perhaps i
naccurate conclusion?) for what LE stated.
Respectfully, if LE chief or spokesman stated 'LEO at scene had fractured leg,' and
if journalist wrote in article 'LEO was dead,' and other MSM repeated that,
does it change nature of LEO's actual injury? Does it place responsibility for inaccuracy on LE?
Not in my mind, but JM2cts.
Legal issue is LEOs'
perception of situation at the time, not whether later determination leg was fractured or broken.
Is there any doubt that that vehicle (whatever it was, I've forgotten) - was capable - when moving -
of causing serious physical injury or death to that LEO or another person at the time when LEO(s) fired?
Thx Fred Hall, for joining thread.
Lots of different opinions and viewpoints. Interesting for me to read them, your and others.
ETA 5:30pm MT. Going to cut & paste this^ and comment further, possibly make correction.