The acoustics in the old courtroom are horrible, and the poor reporters were tweeting as fast as they could.I think during the live tweets it was described as a lump. Either way, it’s a mass of something that melted, burned. MOO
The acoustics in the old courtroom are horrible, and the poor reporters were tweeting as fast as they could.I think during the live tweets it was described as a lump. Either way, it’s a mass of something that melted, burned. MOO
I wonder, why such an intimate info by Slater was necessary at all. I'm uncomfortable with it.![]()
She said SF opened the door and walked out on her porch to see what they were doing. Where they set the fire is long way from the porch, with trees in between. I imagine all SF saw was the outline of her son feeding a fire in a water trough. With a severe limp and a cane, I wouldn't expect her to investigate further in the dark. SF was several days away from hearing that KB was missing at that time. IMO
It's good to remember that the Frazees didn't live in a subdivision with a traditional front yard.
If they're like most farmers and ranchers they probably whipped up a fire wherever they happened to gather a bunch of discards.
No, she said her gun was in the glove compartment with 8 rounds in the clip and none in the chamber. When she got it back there were six in the clip and one in the chamber.
yet, if KK is to be believed, PF moved the body to the ranch and burned it while his mother watched.he did not want it at the ranch with SF and SF2 and any other F family on Thanksgiving
Yeah, mass Tweeting doesn’t exactly lend itself to accuracy in the first place.The acoustics in the old courtroom are horrible, and the poor reporters were tweeting as fast as they could.
Patrick Frazee tied sweater around Kelsey Berreth's face, beat her to death with bat, Idaho nurse told policeStill curious about that "tooth" KK was supposed to collect during her 'ridding the house of evidence'......
Was it a bullet shell casing ?
And yet she left possible evidence in the baked goods on the countertop and also in the bathroom garbage.
Was KK just being lazy, or was the knocked out 'tooth' (i.e., possible bullet s.c.) more important ?
But she didn’t get all the blood according to the affidavit so there’s that IMOThe point is that murder cases without evidence of a body are very difficult to prosecute. In some cases, the massive amounts of blood left behind--so much blood loss it would be impossible to survive--has led to successful convictions.
In this case, KK cleaned up all of the blood. It was a question from the defense about the blood when the officer admitted to the tampons.
JMO
If you are just passing through a state with strict gun laws, as long as you keep those firearms unloaded and in your trunk , that states laws won’t apply to you. The federal law protects gun owners.If one has a concealed weapon license, transporting a loaded firearm in a vehicle is legal in my state. It does not have to be in a trunk. As long as the vehicle has not been altered in anyway (to hide a gun) the loaded or unloaded firearm can be in the glove compartment. Our open carry laws also allow guns to be carried in a vehicle on the seat. Where one gets into trouble is transporting a loaded gun from one state that allows it to another state that does not. When we apply for CCWs, this is literally gone over in class by LE.
Guns in Vehicles in Kentucky | Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence
I agree with you. We do not know for a fact that PF murdered KB and there is no evidence KB is dead nor when she died or how she died. That is why they are at the landfill. They are trying to find corroborating evidence KB is dead.
I'm not about to conclude KK had no involvement in the murder.
JMO
I think it would whittle down to not much and be in the same spot various notorious no-body cases landed, like Susan Powell, Kyron Horman, Ayla Reynolds, Michelle Parker, etc. Just hoping somehow for a slip up or the discovery of a body.
The FBI and CBI simply don't start with a weak investigation and then ramp up to a "more robust" one after time goes on. They start out hard.
All the major investigative work like electronic/computer analysis, witness and POI interviews, is done early on. A lack of evidence doesn't magically translate to these incredible agencies somehow suddenly deciding to do their jobs.
The dates are pretty clear. Unless KK had a time machine, she wasn't there on the 22nd. And it's pretty clear KB was killed on that date.
Yes, anyone is free to believe whatever they feel like believing, even when what they believe isn't support by fact. But my question was how can you second guess them "when the evidence thus far appears to clearly support the charges against PF and indicates KB was not there", not "how can you second guess them?".
Your answer didn't give any facts or reasoning beyond that you can believe what you want to (true) and that no one is infallible and there "might" have been other options.
Seems thin at best.
I agree with you. We do not know for a fact that PF murdered KB and there is no evidence KB is dead nor when she died or how she died. That is why they are at the landfill. They are trying to find corroborating evidence KB is dead.
I'm not about to conclude KK had no involvement in the murder.
JMO