- Joined
- Nov 12, 2014
- Messages
- 4,587
- Reaction score
- 43,461
I have seen some of us, who believe that CW is guilty as charged, are being accused of 'confirmation bias.'
Dang right I am biased! The facts themselves have made me biased to his guilt. ☺
I have seen some of us, who believe that CW is guilty as charged, are being accused of 'confirmation bias.'
If only he had called 911 and we were looking at a crime scene where all the bodies were there and he was making his claims....then I might be weighing all possibilities more.Dang right I am biased! The facts themselves have made me biased to his guilt. ☺
The whole stepped out for a moment story is a lie. That didn't happen. He said it in order to make Shanann the villain. But the fact that he said 'for a moment' is telling. It took only a very short time for him to successfully strangle the little girls. IMOI think there is a significant story behind that stepped out for a moment. I think he said went downstairs for a moment. To get what?
So... Maybe he was hoping to be finished by the time the garbage was picked up, and the late flight interfered with his plan to get rid of any evidence?I did not see this, but FYI in a video taken and posted by SW on FB earlier this year during a terrible wind storm, she mentions that trash pick up on her street is around 3 to 4 pm.
Exactly. It’s the postoffense behavior that really hurts his case. I’d be incredibly skeptical regardless, but NO ONE behaves like he behaved following the murders.If only he had called 911 and we were looking at a crime scene where all the bodies were there and he was making his claims....then I might be weighing all possibilities more.
If only he had called 911 and we were looking at a crime scene where all the bodies were there and he was making his claims....then I might be weighing all possibilities more.
The VI thought that response was due to if his AP was watching and not wanting her to know.
Right, he had no choice but to say he left the room. The reason why doesnt matter. JmoThe whole stepped out for a moment story is a lie. That didn't happen. He said it in order to make Shanann the villain. But the fact that he said 'for a moment' is telling. It took only a very short time for him to successfully strangle the little girls. IMO
Could be. I think it took him well beyond 7am though. I think he could easily have spent an hour and 1/2 just digging. I'm also going with the theory that he disposed of all four of them at the same time.I've always thought he might have seen a vehicle spraying dust, and coming along that road, which is why he got rid of SW in such a faulty manner. It could have been past 7 by that time. It also could have been the reason that some co-worker may have remembered seeing him.
Well, if garbage pick up is on Tuesday and not on Monday, then that would be a big risk on his part for no one to have reported her missing by Tuesday. Plus, sometimes garbage can be found and recovered. Most people would take incriminating evidence far away or burn it, IMO.So... Maybe he was hoping to be finished by the time the garbage was picked up, and the late flight interfered with his plan to get rid of any evidence?
The (damning) facts have led us to that conclusion. We’d have to ignore the facts in order to reach the conclusion that he wasn’t responsible.
The people using the phrase “confirmation bias” in order to dispute the evidence of his guilt, are ironically the perpetrators of this “confirmation bias.”
This is exactly what I thought and posted yesterday. Possibly they had plans to be together. AP might have thought they were already separated. He could have been seeing the AP for months or years maybe less we just don’t know.I wonder how much that plays a role. Could it be similar to what Scott Peterson's goal was, to start over with someone else? We haven't heard much about that relationship so I guess it's too soon to know. But the assumption that he would be conscious of what she would think leads one to wonder.... jmo
I doubt she has "start an emotional conversation with my husband" on her list, either. Pregnant and tired, she'd have "straight to bed" on her mind, but she'd look into baby monitors on floor 1. This is where he killed her I think.I’d bet everything I have that a positive-minded, 34 year-old pregnant woman who loves her kids, is not feeling well, and is probably exhausted at 1:48am from traveling, does not have ‘kill my children’ on her list when she walks through the door.
If only he had called 911 and we were looking at a crime scene where all the bodies were there and he was making his claims....then I might be weighing all possibilities more.
It’s one thing to be undecided. It’s another thing to lean towards him being innocent. I wasn’t directing my comment towards anyone in particular, just the sentiment in general.RBBM
Just to be clear, some of us that are not fully convinced that CW is responsible are not ignoring facts. We don't have the facts to determine who is responsible for the deaths of the girls.
Except those that have little regard or respect for human life. Or are devoid of emotion and empathy. Or don't feel guilt. Or feel their behavior is justified. Or all of those things. ImoExactly. It’s the postoffense behavior that really hurts his case. I’d be incredibly skeptical regardless, but NO ONE behaves like he behaved following the murders.
I respectfully disagree. If no more evidence came to light pointing in either direction, I believe a jury could convict based on what we know in the public domain. I believe people have been found guilty on less evidence (circumstantial). Scott Peterson was convicted based on mostly circumstantial evidence such as this with very little to no physical evidence (hair on pliers).RBBM
Just to be clear, some of us that are not fully convinced that CW is responsible are not ignoring facts. We don't have the facts to determine who is responsible for the deaths of the girls.
Yes. The things we saw in the postoffense behavior are the exact same things we’d expect to see in the killer. They fit perfectly.Except those that have little regard or respect for human life. Or are devoid of emotion and empathy. Or don't feel guilt. Or feel their behavior is justified. Or all of those things. Imo
What facts do you need, though? What facts do you have that SW killed the children?RBBM
Just to be clear, some of us that are not fully convinced that CW is responsible are not ignoring facts. We don't have the facts to determine who is responsible for the deaths of the girls.
It’s one thing to be undecided. It’s another thing to lean towards him being innocent. I wasn’t directing my comment towards anyone in particular, just the sentiment in general.