She may have in her deletion of potential evidence,deception and possible hindering an investigation.
Maybe - but at this stage that is speculation
She may have in her deletion of potential evidence,deception and possible hindering an investigation.
If she was using Jim's fb account to snoop on SW and CW, she probably wouldn't want LE searching his computer/phone. Does this man live with her part time? I understand her wanting to protect her friend/boyfriend/relative from being involved but there could be more to it, if she was snooping, that's what fb is for, lol, nothing to be ashamed or defensive about.Obsessively so, possibly she initiated the affair...why is she so worried about involving Jim? so weird! Her best friend but has no clue what's going on when it's on National News?
I also think the information they got from her was more helpful to the investigation than harmful . If they really thought she was intentionally holding back or destroying evidence because she knew that he murdered them or was in any way involved I would think they would have charged her with something. ImoI’m guessing since LE got their killer within days and he was convicted and sentenced within weeks there’s no need.
jmo
See, to me, /if/ she believed he was living in the basement (and I'm not sure how much he was?) and separated by all but papers and location that's not at all the same as trying to seduce him out of a happy marriage. (But even then, it takes two and I don't really believe in "homewreckers" as a thing.) I don't see why it would be a stretch to imagine he lied or downplayed things to NK when he's the main person in this case we know for absolute certain lied a lot about some big things.
I don't see this warm all over each other relationship between Chris and Shanann that suddenly stopped. The videos of their interactions seem so uncomfortable to me. But that's after the fact interpretation so I really don't know.
It's not speculation.Maybe - but at this stage that is speculation
I am going to guess that it's because all of it is/was potential evidence in a triple homicide investigation. MOOOverall I don't really understand the point of State of Colorado publishing all of NK's evidence online when she is a cooperating witness.
Seems to only send the message not to cooperate.
So why are they doing it?
The only thing I can think of is that NK & Watts conspired in deleting the texts and trying to hide her existence.
It has to be a real beef - not some untruths at the edges of her evidence.
If I had just heard my grand children were dead, I would cry. I would Say, where are they? I would not just behave like nothing had happened.
If that were the case, she really thought they were separated and on the way to a divorce I would agree with you. I just find it exceptionally difficult to believe she did not know he was married with children since she had previously searched for Shan'ann on the internet and she choose to go forward with the affair. Agree about being a home wrecker - saying no is always an option for both parties.See, to me, /if/ she believed he was living in the basement (and I'm not sure how much he was?) and separated by all but papers and location that's not at all the same as trying to seduce him out of a happy marriage. (But even then, it takes two and I don't really believe in "homewreckers" as a thing.) I don't see why it would be a stretch to imagine he lied or downplayed things to NK when he's the main person in this case we know for absolute certain lied a lot about some big things.
I don't see this warm all over each other relationship between Chris and Shanann that suddenly stopped. The videos of their interactions seem so uncomfortable to me. But that's after the fact interpretation so I really don't know.
It's not speculation.
DA Rourke said she hampered the investigation, hampered their ability to get the electronic digital connection between the two, was "mostly" forthcoming.
I think if she had deleted her messages after she had contacted LE and had been interviewed she may have been charged with interfering or hindering the investigation or whatever it's called. Maybe that's why she didn't get charged. What day did she say she deleted everything? Was it on Monday or Tuesday?She may have in her deletion of potential evidence,deception and possible hindering an investigation. As far as the affair, it just shows she needs a stronger moral compass but her deception in the interviews knowing a wife and 2 children have been murdered shows no moral compass at all.
View attachment 157842 View attachment 157844 View attachment 157845
BBM
I don't know what videos you're looking at, but these are photos of June 23, 24 and 25th taken in San Diego. They do not look "uncomfortable" to me. Can you link the videos? MOO
Ironically enough, NK with the loudmouth, selfish ways, was not going to uhm, work out for long with CW...Drew Peterson rings a bell..
Could anyone link me to the audio of NK police interview please ? Tia
Agree and even if it were fact she is already suffering consequences for trying to deceive the public and LE.Maybe - but at this stage that is speculation
No, you didn't imagine it. I am including all of her searches in my response since it was suggested by someone that only talking about one of her searches is unfair. The following begins on Pg 1887 (Discovery pg 2082).Did I read somewhere that NK had did an online search for SW back in September 2017 ? Or did I imagine this?
If so then NK saw a happy couple IMO
Could anyone link me to the audio of NK police interview please ? Tia