Wow this is what makes horse races, I guess. I think there is a nice mountain of evidence against him. How much more could you possibly need? Evidence of planning ahead -- not just calling his co-worker to make sure he would be alone at Cervi 319, but calling his children's school; calling the realtor; running like a madman into the house not to look of this wife and children but to be ahead of the cops after his vague and changing stories about where they went; referring to them in past tense; the washing of the sheets and smell of cleaning fluid.The autopsy report was QUITE damning given he said he strangled Shan'ann because she strangled the children, and it turned out they were smothered. So so so many pieces of evidence, is there a list somewhere? All point to one person, the only person home with them, the only person to leave that house alive that day. No one else came or went. Why are you so desperate to find him less than 100% guilty? I am genuinely curious and confused. I think it's one of the most clearcut cases I have ever seen, short of his actually being caught in the act of murder. He didn't want a trial because he can barely stand knowing what people think of him now. He couldn't deal with his coworkers learning he had dumped his children and wife in oil and dirt. That was worse than the fact that they were dead in his mind - being scene as the monstrous murderer he is. A fate worse than death for sure. He's a sick ticket, is that anything less than apparent?
