Fishy Elements of IN Real Est Sale?
Agree.I mentioned this way back, when we first knew of it! Didn't know about the seller/buyer agent being the same so now it makes even more sense. This needn't be a pending sale that preceded SM's disappearance, unless someone knows where to find prior contract info and even that would be suspect.
It could've easily been set up after the fact as a sale to a 'family member' or LLC that would easily be transferred at any time. I wonder who the attorney was and if they handled both the seller and buyer and I'm sure this is BM's attorney.
Also, the sale may have been handled virtually due to Covid, no muss no fuss.
@marylamby Sorry to be dense, but is ^ post saying or suggesting ---
Q. #1. there was no pending sale/'under contract'/'part 1' of the IN real est transaction, before SM's disappearance, or if there was, it was bogus?
Q.#2. And then after SM's disappearance, that the real est sale was 'closed' /'part 2' when BM digitally signed deed w his name and siggy and w SM's name and siggy w no indication that he was a ct-appted guardian, to convey title to buyer?
But if ^ so and BM intended to fake her name and siggy for part 2, why would he bother to file for G'ship at that time, purportedly to close the sale? Why bother, if his plan was to do a bogus (as to SM's participation) digital close?
Q. #3. AND, why set up a phoney-baloney sale to a friend or fam member, w. either no $$$ being paid, or w $ amt substantially below FMV? If you think, like some here, BM needed those IN sales proceeds to buy Salida area subdivision lot, then wouldn't actual $$$ need to be provided to BM, to pay for it?
Q. #4. If there was an MLS (or equivalent) listing by an agent, then would r/e agent and r/e brokerage willingly 'go w the bogus flow' to participate in sham transaction? And pass up commission?
Q. #5. Ditto, title ins. co?
@marylamby, if I have misunderstood your post, I apologize. Heading to kitchen for more coffee.


