- Joined
- May 21, 2013
- Messages
- 19,672
- Reaction score
- 151,908
The key wording of the act is that investigators MAY ASSUME. It doesn't say anything about having to prove in advance.
IMO
Yet we have been given no reason to believe this is what happened in SM's case.
As in, we have no reason to believe the CCSO's used this "presumption" of a kidnapping across state lines, to get the FBI on board because nothing like that has ever been stated by any LE in re: to this case.
What we do know, is what Spezze said in the 05.14 presser (he asked them to come on board to assist) and that it was the FBI's ERT (evidence recovery team) at the riverside dig site. So that tells me they (the FBI) were there in a very specific capacity, to give the CCSO additional resources.