- Joined
- May 21, 2013
- Messages
- 19,707
- Reaction score
- 152,217
It's not odd to me they have not confirmed the bike, giving they have not confirmed much of anything as far as investigation findings.
To me it sounds like this: Suzanne Morhew is missing, a personal item was recovered, the end.
I do think the buddy, GD, took issue with the handling of the bike when it was discovered and think that was his honest reaction. (I'm personally not suspicious of GD) If SM would have been found alive, but injured that night, they (BM's family/friends) probably wouldn't have thought more about the bike. She safe. It's not unusual, IMO, for family and friends of the missing to criticize LE along the way. It happens and LE is use to it and can take the punches. IMO
I have to wonder if GD's reaction wasn't predisposed that way, due to something BM told him, before GD ever arrived on site. Maybe suggesting to him that it was possibly a kidnapping, so naturally, a crime scene where the bike was located. GD had to have some reason for acting like it was an evidence recovery scene, instead of an accidental bike crash. Or... maybe it was really obvious to GD right away, that it actually was a staged scene, regardless of what (if anything) BM told him, before he got there?
So many unknowns, STILL, after all this time.
ETA: I do wonder if BM told GD about this guy, that he told AM about. The alleged ex-employee that was on drugs, and messed up the wall in Broomfield. The guy who BM said he ran into just a WEEK prior to Suzanne going missing (my, how convenient is that, eh?) and threatened him, and that he had to tell him to leave his family alone, "or else". If GD knew about this guy, it makes a lot more sense why he might think Suzanne's crashed bike might have been the result of this rogue employee making good on the alleged threats BM said he made.
Last edited: