ATasteOfHoney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2012
- Messages
- 5,897
- Reaction score
- 241
Oh my bad..i just followed the link from the post chunky was replying to which simply took me to the recent comments from Toni's blog which were talking about the denver online article and more specifically the one detailed comment inder that article(the one which you posted i thought..lol i remember your spidey senses tingling..lol)..anyhow toni replied back to the person speaking of the lone wolf post under the denver article that toni appreciated her letting her know thats what the link posted in tonis comment section was actually to..with toni saying she had erased the comment with the link...
So thats why i posted referencing your post with the spidey link..lol..i quite obviously did not see the comments referencing a controversial forum..lol..someone please do share..lol
No problem SmoothOperator---I can clarify. The comment in question that was very contentious (imo) & not located on WS forum or Mom's blog about M. It was a Denver Post article that someone made a very unusual comment below it. Just to clarify, I didn't post the Denver Post link because those commenters don't have to abide by WS rules and I interpret them in a way that would've made me feel uncomfortable posting them, however others may have felt it okay or may have not read the comment that was very contentious below the Denver Post article. Regarding a poster on Mom's blog, they were just trying to give her a heads up about it I think or perhaps telling her to be more careful about putting up first and last names on her own blog of the people she suspected were involved. That's all.:seeya: