Summer Games in Japan are also a thing. Tour de France includes Italy? I think the global economy must be stopped to stop the spread of the deadly virus, but so far borders are open, WHO is stalling on calling a pandemic a pandemic, and economics are prevalent in the minds of governments. From a government viewpoint, the perspective would be that most people survive and they need strong leadership. The longer they can delay awareness of pandemic, the longer there is to manage the economy.
I think the global economy, or local or national economies, are not there just to produce obscene profits for rich people.
It's also about people having jobs, so that they can buy food, pay rent, etc. It's also about making products and getting them to the shops, and that includes food, medicine, PPE, etc.
Transport systems are part of the economy, and they're about getting doctors and nurses into work...I imagine plenty of them travel by tube/underground railways in cities like London and New York.
Breaking down all of these things can lead to the breakdown of social order and law and order. Not good. It has so many knock-on effects, like dominoes in a row, and when one goes down it takes all the others with it.
Sometimes it might be the correct thing to do to place a lockdown on a city in a country but still keep the borders open for the actual country. You don't cut off an arm for cut finger, you put a plaster around the finger. If the finger cut gets infected with MRSA, then you have to look wider than the finger itself, but your first action isn't going to be cutting off the arm.
With a 1 or 2% fatality rate, I don't think continuity of government is really the issue they're concerned about. And when they're concerned about economy, it's not just about money but about the human effects that are so closely tied to the economy and that you can't separate from the economy.
I tend to agree with that article about getting people emotionally prepared prior to a pandemic. And even with that you have to be careful....look at things like hurricanes in the USA (which I feel a bit more awareness of people's reactions than I do for cyclones in Asia) and how many people stay put even when they should really evacuate? And of course, both individuals and governments don't want to have mass evacuations if they don't really need to. And sometimes they get it wrong, the hurricane might change course and hit a different place, it might weaken and not do the damage that was feared. And sometimes it can be worse than expected, like in New Orleans a few years ago.
Look what happens when it snows and people rush to the shops for milk and bread.....and over here we feel that way even if we only get three inches of snow and we live in a city that isn't going to be cut off for weeks. You don't want to bring on panic, if you're in government, you'd rather use band aids on fingers than go around unnecessarily chopping off arms and legs and doing things there's no going back from and the side-effects are worse than the original disease.
Even in Wuhan, they were still keeping supermarkets stocked up with food and presumably basic OTC medicines. If we can get 10% of people doing a little extra stocking up so that they can stay inside for the entirety of a 14-day lockdown without needing to go out, that's going to ease things for the entire community, and it's going to reduce the number of people who rush to the store and empty the shelves without the store having time to re-order between people getting just a little extra at a time.
We here in this forum need to be the ones saying to our friends/relatives who've been ignoring the stories, saying "keep calm, here's what I've read, here's what we can do....don't panic"