- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
- Messages
- 17,909
- Reaction score
- 297,607
Vehicle events
The device paired with the vehicle at 2pm [Didn't catch the specific time.]
The device paired with the vehicle at 2pm [Didn't catch the specific time.]
Yes.So is JS going to allude that JFD used her phone @ 2:56p
Certainly agree she didn’t make calls, but curious why he was bringing the late afternoon pairing to attention.Yes.
After talking to her doctor.
Quick Google search, which the jury cannot do, knocks that down
Based on the bloody scene at Welles, JFd wasn't in any shape for making phone calls.
Abd she didn't cut off and throw away her own bloody clothes.
Jmo
A fit y,I’m bringing back a wonderful and very thorough post from @LittleBitty on the issue of the Suburban 2015 crash by MT and blood evidence found in the same vehicle:
LittleBitty
Tiny Texas Tornado
Ya! The whole incident is weird.
Coincidentally, FD had also been in court that day. For custody/divorce issues. In his very contentious divorce/custody battle with his estranged wife Jennifer.
The wording in the SW for #19 says that LE spoke to JFd attorney, Rueben S. Middler. The last time FD attempted/appeared in court was on 5/17 and he "DID NOT PREVAIL." It was in the words of Middler, a "LOSING" court appearance.
Keep in mind that prior to this final court appearance for JFd as she went missing exactly one week later and is now presumed murdered, that FD had lost physical custody/visitation with his kids from 3/1/2018 until 3/20/19 (this is the date most SWs go back to with regards to FD/MT/JFd phone records and such). BUT he was trying to get regular visitation. Judge Heller only granted supervised visits and ALSO REFUSED Fotis the "right to reintroduce his children to Michelle Troconis."
SW #28 for blood, etc...for the Black 2015 K1500 Chevrolet Suburban registered to Fore Group, Inc. SW was dated 5/30/19.
In SW#28 LE did a check of their database. It listed an accident which occurred on 5/17 on I-84 in Tolland involving the Black 2015 K1500 Chevrolet Suburban registered to Fore Group, Inc.
Michelle Troconis (paramour, liar and chief word salad crossword puzzle expert) was listed as the claimant driver. Photos associated with the claim documented damage to the LEFT front quarter panel of the vehicle. No FURTHER details were given regarding the incident.
SW #28 also mentions (NO DATE given for the camera surveillance that LE obtained) that LE had located surveillance video from residence located at 7 Thurton Drive (dead end street) which is 600 feet South West of JFd 69 Welles Lane address. Surveillance shows a dark colored Chevy Suburban with DAMAGE to the left front quarter panel of the vehicle. LE could not tell if it was outfitted with the removable Thule rack.
LE sent the surveillance video to Hartford PD for possible enhancement. No further information is given. No dates/times or if enhancement was able to see more. Or if pings or cell data related to this surveillance video.
We know that JFd blood was found in this vehicle.
Ex# 135-143 (2) swabs (no idea what they are of or what they tested for)
Ex# 144 (1) bloodlike stain (Luminol +) (KM+)
Ex# 145 (1) WeatherTech floor liner with latent blood like stains
Ex# 136 (1) GM Infotainment System (took this to mean Sirius XM)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now that we are all caught up on the Fore(ver Losers) Group, Inc. Chevy Suburban and blood evidence and MT poor driving...
Did MT flip her lid because FD lost in court on that day? Was she mad that FD was in court and got to see JFd? Did she become enraged and unhinged because the Judge said MT was STILL not allowed to be around FD children? Did she drive over to 69 Welles Lane just to make sure Fotis wasn't over there (even though he wasn't allowed to be without court appointed observer for visitations only).
Was Friday May 17th the day for a visitation for FD and the kids? I think it was. He had them alternating Fridays and Saturdays. As well as every Wednesday from 4:30 to 7:30 pm.
I wonder where that visitation took place.
Saturday the 25th at 11:00 was the next visit following the 5/22 visit on JFd back patio that she graciously allowed to happen on her property.
Did MT drive recklessly because she had to get away from 4Jax for the visitation? Was it in Farmington? And she wrecked? Wonder if she wrecked the Porsche Cayenne too? That was parked at 585 Deercliff Road in Avon, CT in the garage. The one that FD "graciously" gave the seats to EE to replace the evidence stained ones in his Red Toyota Tacoma.
I wonder about her mental stability. She was insanely jealous of and angry with JFd. That much is obvious. But 5/17 and the losing court date further illustrated that on Wednesdays from 4:30 to 7:30pm and alternating Fridays and Saturdays, MT would have to have no contact with FD or FD children. Did it upset our Princess of low morals and standards?
Who knows but 5/17 is significant for a lot of reasons!!!
Car wreck with MT. Losing day in Court for FD. And the clock is ticking...Jennifer has exactly one week left to live.
His main goal with the phone record was to show a call to a “doctor” just before her “so called disappearance” … wants to make it look like she needed help from a Doctor.JS highlights the outgoing call on May 24 at 7:54. Call wasn't necessarily made in the vehicle.
JS just says a so-called iPhone....
JS asks if these calls would also show up on the carrier logs.
Objection, scope, overruled. Yes.
And IMO and IME laughable because of the actual specialty of said doctor. JMOHis main goal with the phone record was to show a call to a “doctor” just before her “so called disappearance” … wants to make it look like she needed help from a Doctor.
Meanwhile was probably making an appt or leaving voice message … as too early to speak to someone at medical office!!
She must have gotten every piece of greige clothing that she could find at MarshallsMT is literally blending into the walls today ... I'm beginning to despise beige.
MT (and her daughter who was used by the couple to circumvent earlier error in court ruling to exclude her from contact) and FD both used damaging manipulative psychological tactics including guilt, shame and love etc. to have the Dulos children LIE to their mother about the presence of MT and her daughter from the children’s visits over a long period of time.A fit y,
I wasn’t following when FD lost the custody case and MT was not allowed contact with the Dulos children. What was the reason given by the court that MT could have no contact with those children? Thank you.
He probably can’t afford one-he’s been paying a lawyer for almost 5 years, had to replace his truck that was confiscated, lost his job (and is probably considered toxic now), and lost $1,500 on a dirt bike that MT claimed he effectively stole from her. I’m sure there are more financial issues related to this, too.Hope PG has a nice vacation/something relaxing planned starting bright and early this AM!